Cargando…
Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR)
In the digital era, we witness the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) to solve problems, while improving productivity and efficiency. Yet, inevitably costs are involved with delegating power to algorithmically based systems, some of whose workings are opaque and unobservable and thus ter...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34149122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12115-021-00594-8 |
_version_ | 1783707906840985600 |
---|---|
author | Elliott, Karen Price, Rob Shaw, Patricia Spiliotopoulos, Tasos Ng, Magdalene Coopamootoo, Kovila van Moorsel, Aad |
author_facet | Elliott, Karen Price, Rob Shaw, Patricia Spiliotopoulos, Tasos Ng, Magdalene Coopamootoo, Kovila van Moorsel, Aad |
author_sort | Elliott, Karen |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the digital era, we witness the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) to solve problems, while improving productivity and efficiency. Yet, inevitably costs are involved with delegating power to algorithmically based systems, some of whose workings are opaque and unobservable and thus termed the “black box”. Central to understanding the “black box” is to acknowledge that the algorithm is not mendaciously undertaking this action; it is simply using the recombination afforded to scaled computable machine learning algorithms. But an algorithm with arbitrary precision can easily reconstruct those characteristics and make life-changing decisions, particularly in financial services (credit scoring, risk assessment, etc.), and it could be difficult to reconstruct, if this was done in a fair manner reflecting the values of society. If we permit AI to make life-changing decisions, what are the opportunity costs, data trade-offs, and implications for social, economic, technical, legal, and environmental systems? We find that over 160 ethical AI principles exist, advocating organisations to act responsibly to avoid causing digital societal harms. This maelstrom of guidance, none of which is compulsory, serves to confuse, as opposed to guide. We need to think carefully about how we implement these algorithms, the delegation of decisions and data usage, in the absence of human oversight and AI governance. The paper seeks to harmonise and align approaches, illustrating the opportunities and threats of AI, while raising awareness of Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) as a potential collaborative mechanism to demystify governance complexity and to establish an equitable digital society. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8202049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82020492021-06-15 Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) Elliott, Karen Price, Rob Shaw, Patricia Spiliotopoulos, Tasos Ng, Magdalene Coopamootoo, Kovila van Moorsel, Aad Society Original Article In the digital era, we witness the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) to solve problems, while improving productivity and efficiency. Yet, inevitably costs are involved with delegating power to algorithmically based systems, some of whose workings are opaque and unobservable and thus termed the “black box”. Central to understanding the “black box” is to acknowledge that the algorithm is not mendaciously undertaking this action; it is simply using the recombination afforded to scaled computable machine learning algorithms. But an algorithm with arbitrary precision can easily reconstruct those characteristics and make life-changing decisions, particularly in financial services (credit scoring, risk assessment, etc.), and it could be difficult to reconstruct, if this was done in a fair manner reflecting the values of society. If we permit AI to make life-changing decisions, what are the opportunity costs, data trade-offs, and implications for social, economic, technical, legal, and environmental systems? We find that over 160 ethical AI principles exist, advocating organisations to act responsibly to avoid causing digital societal harms. This maelstrom of guidance, none of which is compulsory, serves to confuse, as opposed to guide. We need to think carefully about how we implement these algorithms, the delegation of decisions and data usage, in the absence of human oversight and AI governance. The paper seeks to harmonise and align approaches, illustrating the opportunities and threats of AI, while raising awareness of Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) as a potential collaborative mechanism to demystify governance complexity and to establish an equitable digital society. Springer US 2021-06-14 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8202049/ /pubmed/34149122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12115-021-00594-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Elliott, Karen Price, Rob Shaw, Patricia Spiliotopoulos, Tasos Ng, Magdalene Coopamootoo, Kovila van Moorsel, Aad Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) |
title | Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) |
title_full | Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) |
title_fullStr | Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) |
title_full_unstemmed | Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) |
title_short | Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) |
title_sort | towards an equitable digital society: artificial intelligence (ai) and corporate digital responsibility (cdr) |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34149122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12115-021-00594-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elliottkaren towardsanequitabledigitalsocietyartificialintelligenceaiandcorporatedigitalresponsibilitycdr AT pricerob towardsanequitabledigitalsocietyartificialintelligenceaiandcorporatedigitalresponsibilitycdr AT shawpatricia towardsanequitabledigitalsocietyartificialintelligenceaiandcorporatedigitalresponsibilitycdr AT spiliotopoulostasos towardsanequitabledigitalsocietyartificialintelligenceaiandcorporatedigitalresponsibilitycdr AT ngmagdalene towardsanequitabledigitalsocietyartificialintelligenceaiandcorporatedigitalresponsibilitycdr AT coopamootookovila towardsanequitabledigitalsocietyartificialintelligenceaiandcorporatedigitalresponsibilitycdr AT vanmoorselaad towardsanequitabledigitalsocietyartificialintelligenceaiandcorporatedigitalresponsibilitycdr |