Cargando…

Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR)

In the digital era, we witness the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) to solve problems, while improving productivity and efficiency. Yet, inevitably costs are involved with delegating power to algorithmically based systems, some of whose workings are opaque and unobservable and thus ter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elliott, Karen, Price, Rob, Shaw, Patricia, Spiliotopoulos, Tasos, Ng, Magdalene, Coopamootoo, Kovila, van Moorsel, Aad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34149122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12115-021-00594-8
_version_ 1783707906840985600
author Elliott, Karen
Price, Rob
Shaw, Patricia
Spiliotopoulos, Tasos
Ng, Magdalene
Coopamootoo, Kovila
van Moorsel, Aad
author_facet Elliott, Karen
Price, Rob
Shaw, Patricia
Spiliotopoulos, Tasos
Ng, Magdalene
Coopamootoo, Kovila
van Moorsel, Aad
author_sort Elliott, Karen
collection PubMed
description In the digital era, we witness the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) to solve problems, while improving productivity and efficiency. Yet, inevitably costs are involved with delegating power to algorithmically based systems, some of whose workings are opaque and unobservable and thus termed the “black box”. Central to understanding the “black box” is to acknowledge that the algorithm is not mendaciously undertaking this action; it is simply using the recombination afforded to scaled computable machine learning algorithms. But an algorithm with arbitrary precision can easily reconstruct those characteristics and make life-changing decisions, particularly in financial services (credit scoring, risk assessment, etc.), and it could be difficult to reconstruct, if this was done in a fair manner reflecting the values of society. If we permit AI to make life-changing decisions, what are the opportunity costs, data trade-offs, and implications for social, economic, technical, legal, and environmental systems? We find that over 160 ethical AI principles exist, advocating organisations to act responsibly to avoid causing digital societal harms. This maelstrom of guidance, none of which is compulsory, serves to confuse, as opposed to guide. We need to think carefully about how we implement these algorithms, the delegation of decisions and data usage, in the absence of human oversight and AI governance. The paper seeks to harmonise and align approaches, illustrating the opportunities and threats of AI, while raising awareness of Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) as a potential collaborative mechanism to demystify governance complexity and to establish an equitable digital society.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8202049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82020492021-06-15 Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) Elliott, Karen Price, Rob Shaw, Patricia Spiliotopoulos, Tasos Ng, Magdalene Coopamootoo, Kovila van Moorsel, Aad Society Original Article In the digital era, we witness the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) to solve problems, while improving productivity and efficiency. Yet, inevitably costs are involved with delegating power to algorithmically based systems, some of whose workings are opaque and unobservable and thus termed the “black box”. Central to understanding the “black box” is to acknowledge that the algorithm is not mendaciously undertaking this action; it is simply using the recombination afforded to scaled computable machine learning algorithms. But an algorithm with arbitrary precision can easily reconstruct those characteristics and make life-changing decisions, particularly in financial services (credit scoring, risk assessment, etc.), and it could be difficult to reconstruct, if this was done in a fair manner reflecting the values of society. If we permit AI to make life-changing decisions, what are the opportunity costs, data trade-offs, and implications for social, economic, technical, legal, and environmental systems? We find that over 160 ethical AI principles exist, advocating organisations to act responsibly to avoid causing digital societal harms. This maelstrom of guidance, none of which is compulsory, serves to confuse, as opposed to guide. We need to think carefully about how we implement these algorithms, the delegation of decisions and data usage, in the absence of human oversight and AI governance. The paper seeks to harmonise and align approaches, illustrating the opportunities and threats of AI, while raising awareness of Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR) as a potential collaborative mechanism to demystify governance complexity and to establish an equitable digital society. Springer US 2021-06-14 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8202049/ /pubmed/34149122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12115-021-00594-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Elliott, Karen
Price, Rob
Shaw, Patricia
Spiliotopoulos, Tasos
Ng, Magdalene
Coopamootoo, Kovila
van Moorsel, Aad
Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR)
title Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR)
title_full Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR)
title_fullStr Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR)
title_full_unstemmed Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR)
title_short Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR)
title_sort towards an equitable digital society: artificial intelligence (ai) and corporate digital responsibility (cdr)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34149122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12115-021-00594-8
work_keys_str_mv AT elliottkaren towardsanequitabledigitalsocietyartificialintelligenceaiandcorporatedigitalresponsibilitycdr
AT pricerob towardsanequitabledigitalsocietyartificialintelligenceaiandcorporatedigitalresponsibilitycdr
AT shawpatricia towardsanequitabledigitalsocietyartificialintelligenceaiandcorporatedigitalresponsibilitycdr
AT spiliotopoulostasos towardsanequitabledigitalsocietyartificialintelligenceaiandcorporatedigitalresponsibilitycdr
AT ngmagdalene towardsanequitabledigitalsocietyartificialintelligenceaiandcorporatedigitalresponsibilitycdr
AT coopamootookovila towardsanequitabledigitalsocietyartificialintelligenceaiandcorporatedigitalresponsibilitycdr
AT vanmoorselaad towardsanequitabledigitalsocietyartificialintelligenceaiandcorporatedigitalresponsibilitycdr