Cargando…

Clinical Trial Metrics: The Complexity of Conducting Clinical Trials in North American Cancer Centers

Cancer clinical trials offices (CTOs) support the investigation of cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment at cancer centers across North America. CTOs are a centralized resource for clinical trial conduct and typically use research staff with expertise in four functional areas of clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Carrie, Werner, Theresa L., Deal, Allison M., Krise-Confair, Cassandra J., Bentz, Tricia Adrales, Cummings, Theresa M., Grant, Stefan C., Lee, Ashley Baker, Moehle, Jessica, Moffett, Kristie, Peck, Helen, Williamson, Stephen, Zafirovski, Aleksandar, Shaw, Kate, Hofacker, Janie K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33186085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/OP.20.00501
_version_ 1783707909892341760
author Lee, Carrie
Werner, Theresa L.
Deal, Allison M.
Krise-Confair, Cassandra J.
Bentz, Tricia Adrales
Cummings, Theresa M.
Grant, Stefan C.
Lee, Ashley Baker
Moehle, Jessica
Moffett, Kristie
Peck, Helen
Williamson, Stephen
Zafirovski, Aleksandar
Shaw, Kate
Hofacker, Janie K.
author_facet Lee, Carrie
Werner, Theresa L.
Deal, Allison M.
Krise-Confair, Cassandra J.
Bentz, Tricia Adrales
Cummings, Theresa M.
Grant, Stefan C.
Lee, Ashley Baker
Moehle, Jessica
Moffett, Kristie
Peck, Helen
Williamson, Stephen
Zafirovski, Aleksandar
Shaw, Kate
Hofacker, Janie K.
author_sort Lee, Carrie
collection PubMed
description Cancer clinical trials offices (CTOs) support the investigation of cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment at cancer centers across North America. CTOs are a centralized resource for clinical trial conduct and typically use research staff with expertise in four functional areas of clinical research: finance, regulatory, clinical, and data operations. To our knowledge, there are no publicly available benchmark data sets that characterize the size, cost, volume, and efficiency of these offices, nor whether the metrics differ by National Cancer Institute (NCI) designation. The Association of American Cancer Institutes (AACI) Clinical Research Innovation (CRI) steering committee developed a survey to address this knowledge gap. METHODS: An 11-question survey that addressed CTO budget, accrual and trial volume, full-time equivalents (FTEs), staff turnover, and activation timelines was developed by the AACI CRI steering committee and sent to 92 academic cancer research centers in North America (n = 90 in the United States; n = 2 in Canada), with 79 respondents completing the survey (86% completion rate). RESULTS: The number of FTE employees working in the CTOs ranged from 4.5 to 811 (median, 104). The median number of analytic cases (ie, newly diagnosed or received first course of treatment) reported by the main center was 3,856. Annual CTO budgets ranged from $250,000 to $23,900,000 (median, $8.2 million). The median trial activation time, based on 61 centers, was 167 days. The median number of accruals per center was 480 (range, 5-6,271) and median number of trials per center was 282 (range, 31-1,833). Budget and FTE ranges varied by NCI designation. CONCLUSION: The response rate to the survey was high. These data will allow cancer centers to evaluate their CTO infrastructure, funding, portfolio, and/or accrual goals as compared with peers. A wide range in each of the outcomes was noted, in keeping with the wide variation in size and scope of cancer center CTOs across the United States and Canada. These variations may warrant additional investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8202063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82020632022-01-01 Clinical Trial Metrics: The Complexity of Conducting Clinical Trials in North American Cancer Centers Lee, Carrie Werner, Theresa L. Deal, Allison M. Krise-Confair, Cassandra J. Bentz, Tricia Adrales Cummings, Theresa M. Grant, Stefan C. Lee, Ashley Baker Moehle, Jessica Moffett, Kristie Peck, Helen Williamson, Stephen Zafirovski, Aleksandar Shaw, Kate Hofacker, Janie K. JCO Oncol Pract ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS Cancer clinical trials offices (CTOs) support the investigation of cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment at cancer centers across North America. CTOs are a centralized resource for clinical trial conduct and typically use research staff with expertise in four functional areas of clinical research: finance, regulatory, clinical, and data operations. To our knowledge, there are no publicly available benchmark data sets that characterize the size, cost, volume, and efficiency of these offices, nor whether the metrics differ by National Cancer Institute (NCI) designation. The Association of American Cancer Institutes (AACI) Clinical Research Innovation (CRI) steering committee developed a survey to address this knowledge gap. METHODS: An 11-question survey that addressed CTO budget, accrual and trial volume, full-time equivalents (FTEs), staff turnover, and activation timelines was developed by the AACI CRI steering committee and sent to 92 academic cancer research centers in North America (n = 90 in the United States; n = 2 in Canada), with 79 respondents completing the survey (86% completion rate). RESULTS: The number of FTE employees working in the CTOs ranged from 4.5 to 811 (median, 104). The median number of analytic cases (ie, newly diagnosed or received first course of treatment) reported by the main center was 3,856. Annual CTO budgets ranged from $250,000 to $23,900,000 (median, $8.2 million). The median trial activation time, based on 61 centers, was 167 days. The median number of accruals per center was 480 (range, 5-6,271) and median number of trials per center was 282 (range, 31-1,833). Budget and FTE ranges varied by NCI designation. CONCLUSION: The response rate to the survey was high. These data will allow cancer centers to evaluate their CTO infrastructure, funding, portfolio, and/or accrual goals as compared with peers. A wide range in each of the outcomes was noted, in keeping with the wide variation in size and scope of cancer center CTOs across the United States and Canada. These variations may warrant additional investigation. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2021-01 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8202063/ /pubmed/33186085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/OP.20.00501 Text en © 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
Lee, Carrie
Werner, Theresa L.
Deal, Allison M.
Krise-Confair, Cassandra J.
Bentz, Tricia Adrales
Cummings, Theresa M.
Grant, Stefan C.
Lee, Ashley Baker
Moehle, Jessica
Moffett, Kristie
Peck, Helen
Williamson, Stephen
Zafirovski, Aleksandar
Shaw, Kate
Hofacker, Janie K.
Clinical Trial Metrics: The Complexity of Conducting Clinical Trials in North American Cancer Centers
title Clinical Trial Metrics: The Complexity of Conducting Clinical Trials in North American Cancer Centers
title_full Clinical Trial Metrics: The Complexity of Conducting Clinical Trials in North American Cancer Centers
title_fullStr Clinical Trial Metrics: The Complexity of Conducting Clinical Trials in North American Cancer Centers
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Trial Metrics: The Complexity of Conducting Clinical Trials in North American Cancer Centers
title_short Clinical Trial Metrics: The Complexity of Conducting Clinical Trials in North American Cancer Centers
title_sort clinical trial metrics: the complexity of conducting clinical trials in north american cancer centers
topic ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33186085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/OP.20.00501
work_keys_str_mv AT leecarrie clinicaltrialmetricsthecomplexityofconductingclinicaltrialsinnorthamericancancercenters
AT wernertheresal clinicaltrialmetricsthecomplexityofconductingclinicaltrialsinnorthamericancancercenters
AT dealallisonm clinicaltrialmetricsthecomplexityofconductingclinicaltrialsinnorthamericancancercenters
AT kriseconfaircassandraj clinicaltrialmetricsthecomplexityofconductingclinicaltrialsinnorthamericancancercenters
AT bentztriciaadrales clinicaltrialmetricsthecomplexityofconductingclinicaltrialsinnorthamericancancercenters
AT cummingstheresam clinicaltrialmetricsthecomplexityofconductingclinicaltrialsinnorthamericancancercenters
AT grantstefanc clinicaltrialmetricsthecomplexityofconductingclinicaltrialsinnorthamericancancercenters
AT leeashleybaker clinicaltrialmetricsthecomplexityofconductingclinicaltrialsinnorthamericancancercenters
AT moehlejessica clinicaltrialmetricsthecomplexityofconductingclinicaltrialsinnorthamericancancercenters
AT moffettkristie clinicaltrialmetricsthecomplexityofconductingclinicaltrialsinnorthamericancancercenters
AT peckhelen clinicaltrialmetricsthecomplexityofconductingclinicaltrialsinnorthamericancancercenters
AT williamsonstephen clinicaltrialmetricsthecomplexityofconductingclinicaltrialsinnorthamericancancercenters
AT zafirovskialeksandar clinicaltrialmetricsthecomplexityofconductingclinicaltrialsinnorthamericancancercenters
AT shawkate clinicaltrialmetricsthecomplexityofconductingclinicaltrialsinnorthamericancancercenters
AT hofackerjaniek clinicaltrialmetricsthecomplexityofconductingclinicaltrialsinnorthamericancancercenters