Cargando…

Age of Peak Performance Differs by Functional Task in Mice Tracked Over 2 Years

Mouse models are often used to validate novel interventions prior to human testing, although biological differences between mice and humans limit the translatability of outcomes. A common assumption in animal research is that maximal physical performance will be present at a young age, and that diff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tavoian, Dallin, Lozier, Nicholas R, de Lacalle, Sonsoles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33606019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glab048
_version_ 1783707924247347200
author Tavoian, Dallin
Lozier, Nicholas R
de Lacalle, Sonsoles
author_facet Tavoian, Dallin
Lozier, Nicholas R
de Lacalle, Sonsoles
author_sort Tavoian, Dallin
collection PubMed
description Mouse models are often used to validate novel interventions prior to human testing, although biological differences between mice and humans limit the translatability of outcomes. A common assumption in animal research is that maximal physical performance will be present at a young age, and that differences in task performance between young and old can be attributed to the aging process. However, this may not be true for all physical function tasks, and leaving out intermediate time points could drastically alter data interpretation. Here, we document age-related changes in forelimb and hindlimb grip strength, balance and coordination, and body composition in mice (n = 43) collected at multiple time points between 4 and 24 months of age. Maximal forelimb grip strength was recorded at 4 months of age, but maximal hindlimb grip strength was recorded at 15 months of age. Balance performance was stable from 4 to 15 months of age, declining significantly at 18 months. Both lean and fat mass peaked at 18 months before declining steadily. We conclude that the inclusion of intermediate time points is essential for the accurate evaluation of physical function status in mice, particularly in the context of translating intervention outcomes into strategies to be tested in humans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8202156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82021562021-06-15 Age of Peak Performance Differs by Functional Task in Mice Tracked Over 2 Years Tavoian, Dallin Lozier, Nicholas R de Lacalle, Sonsoles J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci THE JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY: Biological Sciences Mouse models are often used to validate novel interventions prior to human testing, although biological differences between mice and humans limit the translatability of outcomes. A common assumption in animal research is that maximal physical performance will be present at a young age, and that differences in task performance between young and old can be attributed to the aging process. However, this may not be true for all physical function tasks, and leaving out intermediate time points could drastically alter data interpretation. Here, we document age-related changes in forelimb and hindlimb grip strength, balance and coordination, and body composition in mice (n = 43) collected at multiple time points between 4 and 24 months of age. Maximal forelimb grip strength was recorded at 4 months of age, but maximal hindlimb grip strength was recorded at 15 months of age. Balance performance was stable from 4 to 15 months of age, declining significantly at 18 months. Both lean and fat mass peaked at 18 months before declining steadily. We conclude that the inclusion of intermediate time points is essential for the accurate evaluation of physical function status in mice, particularly in the context of translating intervention outcomes into strategies to be tested in humans. Oxford University Press 2021-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8202156/ /pubmed/33606019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glab048 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle THE JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY: Biological Sciences
Tavoian, Dallin
Lozier, Nicholas R
de Lacalle, Sonsoles
Age of Peak Performance Differs by Functional Task in Mice Tracked Over 2 Years
title Age of Peak Performance Differs by Functional Task in Mice Tracked Over 2 Years
title_full Age of Peak Performance Differs by Functional Task in Mice Tracked Over 2 Years
title_fullStr Age of Peak Performance Differs by Functional Task in Mice Tracked Over 2 Years
title_full_unstemmed Age of Peak Performance Differs by Functional Task in Mice Tracked Over 2 Years
title_short Age of Peak Performance Differs by Functional Task in Mice Tracked Over 2 Years
title_sort age of peak performance differs by functional task in mice tracked over 2 years
topic THE JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY: Biological Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33606019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glab048
work_keys_str_mv AT tavoiandallin ageofpeakperformancediffersbyfunctionaltaskinmicetrackedover2years
AT loziernicholasr ageofpeakperformancediffersbyfunctionaltaskinmicetrackedover2years
AT delacallesonsoles ageofpeakperformancediffersbyfunctionaltaskinmicetrackedover2years