Cargando…

Prevalence of left iliac vein compression on computed tomography scans from a population

BACKGROUND: May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) is defined as compression of the left iliac vein between the right iliac artery and the lumbar vertebral body in the presence of signs and symptoms of unilateral left chronic venous insufficiency. However, imaging findings of compression are not manifest in sym...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corrêa, Mateus Picada, Kurtz, Guilherme Soldatelli, Bianchini, Larissa, Copatti, Lauren, Ribeiro, Marcelo, Saleh, Jaber Nashat, Noel, Rafael Stevan, Bajerski, Julio Cesar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV) 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34178055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.190060
_version_ 1783707926623420416
author Corrêa, Mateus Picada
Kurtz, Guilherme Soldatelli
Bianchini, Larissa
Copatti, Lauren
Ribeiro, Marcelo
Saleh, Jaber Nashat
Noel, Rafael Stevan
Bajerski, Julio Cesar
author_facet Corrêa, Mateus Picada
Kurtz, Guilherme Soldatelli
Bianchini, Larissa
Copatti, Lauren
Ribeiro, Marcelo
Saleh, Jaber Nashat
Noel, Rafael Stevan
Bajerski, Julio Cesar
author_sort Corrêa, Mateus Picada
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) is defined as compression of the left iliac vein between the right iliac artery and the lumbar vertebral body in the presence of signs and symptoms of unilateral left chronic venous insufficiency. However, imaging findings of compression are not manifest in symptoms of the syndrome in all subjects. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate findings of compression in an asymptomatic population. METHODS: Computed tomography angiographies or venous phase computed tomographies were analyzed. Demographic data and reason for the exam were recorded. Vein diameter was measured at the site of greatest compression and distal of the compression and the ratio between the two diameters was calculated. RESULTS: From January to July of 2016, 590 computed tomography scans were analyzed (357 women and 233 men). Left iliac compression was found in 14.74% of patients. Patients with a left iliac diameter below the 5mm threshold had a mean diameter at the site of greatest iliac vein compression of 4.4 mm (range: 2.67 mm-4.97 mm). The ratio between the two measurements was < 0.5 in 30% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that iliac vein compression is common among random patients who have had computed tomography for any other reason. This indicates that compression found on tomography images is not the only finding to consider when treating a patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8202169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82021692021-06-24 Prevalence of left iliac vein compression on computed tomography scans from a population Corrêa, Mateus Picada Kurtz, Guilherme Soldatelli Bianchini, Larissa Copatti, Lauren Ribeiro, Marcelo Saleh, Jaber Nashat Noel, Rafael Stevan Bajerski, Julio Cesar J Vasc Bras Original Article BACKGROUND: May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) is defined as compression of the left iliac vein between the right iliac artery and the lumbar vertebral body in the presence of signs and symptoms of unilateral left chronic venous insufficiency. However, imaging findings of compression are not manifest in symptoms of the syndrome in all subjects. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate findings of compression in an asymptomatic population. METHODS: Computed tomography angiographies or venous phase computed tomographies were analyzed. Demographic data and reason for the exam were recorded. Vein diameter was measured at the site of greatest compression and distal of the compression and the ratio between the two diameters was calculated. RESULTS: From January to July of 2016, 590 computed tomography scans were analyzed (357 women and 233 men). Left iliac compression was found in 14.74% of patients. Patients with a left iliac diameter below the 5mm threshold had a mean diameter at the site of greatest iliac vein compression of 4.4 mm (range: 2.67 mm-4.97 mm). The ratio between the two measurements was < 0.5 in 30% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that iliac vein compression is common among random patients who have had computed tomography for any other reason. This indicates that compression found on tomography images is not the only finding to consider when treating a patient. Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV) 2020-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8202169/ /pubmed/34178055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.190060 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Corrêa, Mateus Picada
Kurtz, Guilherme Soldatelli
Bianchini, Larissa
Copatti, Lauren
Ribeiro, Marcelo
Saleh, Jaber Nashat
Noel, Rafael Stevan
Bajerski, Julio Cesar
Prevalence of left iliac vein compression on computed tomography scans from a population
title Prevalence of left iliac vein compression on computed tomography scans from a population
title_full Prevalence of left iliac vein compression on computed tomography scans from a population
title_fullStr Prevalence of left iliac vein compression on computed tomography scans from a population
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of left iliac vein compression on computed tomography scans from a population
title_short Prevalence of left iliac vein compression on computed tomography scans from a population
title_sort prevalence of left iliac vein compression on computed tomography scans from a population
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34178055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.190060
work_keys_str_mv AT correamateuspicada prevalenceofleftiliacveincompressiononcomputedtomographyscansfromapopulation
AT kurtzguilhermesoldatelli prevalenceofleftiliacveincompressiononcomputedtomographyscansfromapopulation
AT bianchinilarissa prevalenceofleftiliacveincompressiononcomputedtomographyscansfromapopulation
AT copattilauren prevalenceofleftiliacveincompressiononcomputedtomographyscansfromapopulation
AT ribeiromarcelo prevalenceofleftiliacveincompressiononcomputedtomographyscansfromapopulation
AT salehjabernashat prevalenceofleftiliacveincompressiononcomputedtomographyscansfromapopulation
AT noelrafaelstevan prevalenceofleftiliacveincompressiononcomputedtomographyscansfromapopulation
AT bajerskijuliocesar prevalenceofleftiliacveincompressiononcomputedtomographyscansfromapopulation