Cargando…

Retrospective study of the efficacy of vascularized tissue transfer for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria-infected wound: Comparison with clean and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria-infected wound

If wounds are infected with bacteria resistant to an empirical antibiotic regimen, effective wound treatment will be delayed. This can delay wound healing and lengthen hospital stays, increasing the costs to patients. Long-term antibiotic use can also result in minor and major complications, such as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Seong Hwan, Lee, Ju Ho, Kim, Seong Eun, Shin, Se Ho, Kim, Hyeon Jo, Lee, Seong Joo, Kim, Jae Hyun, Suh, In Suck
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34114986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025907
_version_ 1783708001897545728
author Kim, Seong Hwan
Lee, Ju Ho
Kim, Seong Eun
Shin, Se Ho
Kim, Hyeon Jo
Lee, Seong Joo
Kim, Jae Hyun
Suh, In Suck
author_facet Kim, Seong Hwan
Lee, Ju Ho
Kim, Seong Eun
Shin, Se Ho
Kim, Hyeon Jo
Lee, Seong Joo
Kim, Jae Hyun
Suh, In Suck
author_sort Kim, Seong Hwan
collection PubMed
description If wounds are infected with bacteria resistant to an empirical antibiotic regimen, effective wound treatment will be delayed. This can delay wound healing and lengthen hospital stays, increasing the costs to patients. Long-term antibiotic use can also result in minor and major complications, such as diarrhea, antibiotic resistance, or life-threatening leukopenia. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria make wound treatment even more difficult. Traditionally, surgeons thought that adequate infection control should be established before soft tissue coverage. However, wounds infected by MDR do not heal well with this traditional method and there are no optimal treatment guidelines for MDR bacteria-contaminated wounds. We reviewed 203 patients who underwent vascularized flap surgery from 2012 to 2019 to cover wounds. Class IV and I wounds were compared according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention classification. Class IV was further classified as antibiotic-resistant (ARB) and antibiotic-sensitive (ASB) bacteria. Wound size, mode, location, pathogens, healing time, and basic demographics were evaluated. Data were compared using Cramer's V and one-way ANOVA or independent t tests. The average healing time was longer in the ARB (19.7 [range 7–44] days) and ASB (17.9 [range 2–36] days) groups than in the Clean group (16.5 [range 7–28] days). Healing time differed in the 3 groups (P = .036). It was longer in the class IV group than in the class I group (P = .01). However, it was not statistically different between the ARB and ASB groups (P = .164). In our study the difference in healing time was small when vascularized tissue transfer was done in ARB-infected wound compared with ASB-infected and clean wound. It is necessary to perform surgery using vascularized tissue for the infected wound of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8202535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82025352021-06-15 Retrospective study of the efficacy of vascularized tissue transfer for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria-infected wound: Comparison with clean and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria-infected wound Kim, Seong Hwan Lee, Ju Ho Kim, Seong Eun Shin, Se Ho Kim, Hyeon Jo Lee, Seong Joo Kim, Jae Hyun Suh, In Suck Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 If wounds are infected with bacteria resistant to an empirical antibiotic regimen, effective wound treatment will be delayed. This can delay wound healing and lengthen hospital stays, increasing the costs to patients. Long-term antibiotic use can also result in minor and major complications, such as diarrhea, antibiotic resistance, or life-threatening leukopenia. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria make wound treatment even more difficult. Traditionally, surgeons thought that adequate infection control should be established before soft tissue coverage. However, wounds infected by MDR do not heal well with this traditional method and there are no optimal treatment guidelines for MDR bacteria-contaminated wounds. We reviewed 203 patients who underwent vascularized flap surgery from 2012 to 2019 to cover wounds. Class IV and I wounds were compared according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention classification. Class IV was further classified as antibiotic-resistant (ARB) and antibiotic-sensitive (ASB) bacteria. Wound size, mode, location, pathogens, healing time, and basic demographics were evaluated. Data were compared using Cramer's V and one-way ANOVA or independent t tests. The average healing time was longer in the ARB (19.7 [range 7–44] days) and ASB (17.9 [range 2–36] days) groups than in the Clean group (16.5 [range 7–28] days). Healing time differed in the 3 groups (P = .036). It was longer in the class IV group than in the class I group (P = .01). However, it was not statistically different between the ARB and ASB groups (P = .164). In our study the difference in healing time was small when vascularized tissue transfer was done in ARB-infected wound compared with ASB-infected and clean wound. It is necessary to perform surgery using vascularized tissue for the infected wound of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8202535/ /pubmed/34114986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025907 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 7100
Kim, Seong Hwan
Lee, Ju Ho
Kim, Seong Eun
Shin, Se Ho
Kim, Hyeon Jo
Lee, Seong Joo
Kim, Jae Hyun
Suh, In Suck
Retrospective study of the efficacy of vascularized tissue transfer for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria-infected wound: Comparison with clean and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria-infected wound
title Retrospective study of the efficacy of vascularized tissue transfer for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria-infected wound: Comparison with clean and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria-infected wound
title_full Retrospective study of the efficacy of vascularized tissue transfer for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria-infected wound: Comparison with clean and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria-infected wound
title_fullStr Retrospective study of the efficacy of vascularized tissue transfer for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria-infected wound: Comparison with clean and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria-infected wound
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective study of the efficacy of vascularized tissue transfer for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria-infected wound: Comparison with clean and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria-infected wound
title_short Retrospective study of the efficacy of vascularized tissue transfer for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria-infected wound: Comparison with clean and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria-infected wound
title_sort retrospective study of the efficacy of vascularized tissue transfer for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria-infected wound: comparison with clean and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria-infected wound
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34114986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025907
work_keys_str_mv AT kimseonghwan retrospectivestudyoftheefficacyofvascularizedtissuetransferfortreatingantibioticresistantbacteriainfectedwoundcomparisonwithcleanandantibioticsensitivebacteriainfectedwound
AT leejuho retrospectivestudyoftheefficacyofvascularizedtissuetransferfortreatingantibioticresistantbacteriainfectedwoundcomparisonwithcleanandantibioticsensitivebacteriainfectedwound
AT kimseongeun retrospectivestudyoftheefficacyofvascularizedtissuetransferfortreatingantibioticresistantbacteriainfectedwoundcomparisonwithcleanandantibioticsensitivebacteriainfectedwound
AT shinseho retrospectivestudyoftheefficacyofvascularizedtissuetransferfortreatingantibioticresistantbacteriainfectedwoundcomparisonwithcleanandantibioticsensitivebacteriainfectedwound
AT kimhyeonjo retrospectivestudyoftheefficacyofvascularizedtissuetransferfortreatingantibioticresistantbacteriainfectedwoundcomparisonwithcleanandantibioticsensitivebacteriainfectedwound
AT leeseongjoo retrospectivestudyoftheefficacyofvascularizedtissuetransferfortreatingantibioticresistantbacteriainfectedwoundcomparisonwithcleanandantibioticsensitivebacteriainfectedwound
AT kimjaehyun retrospectivestudyoftheefficacyofvascularizedtissuetransferfortreatingantibioticresistantbacteriainfectedwoundcomparisonwithcleanandantibioticsensitivebacteriainfectedwound
AT suhinsuck retrospectivestudyoftheefficacyofvascularizedtissuetransferfortreatingantibioticresistantbacteriainfectedwoundcomparisonwithcleanandantibioticsensitivebacteriainfectedwound