Cargando…
Retrospective study of the efficacy of vascularized tissue transfer for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria-infected wound: Comparison with clean and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria-infected wound
If wounds are infected with bacteria resistant to an empirical antibiotic regimen, effective wound treatment will be delayed. This can delay wound healing and lengthen hospital stays, increasing the costs to patients. Long-term antibiotic use can also result in minor and major complications, such as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34114986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025907 |
_version_ | 1783708001897545728 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Seong Hwan Lee, Ju Ho Kim, Seong Eun Shin, Se Ho Kim, Hyeon Jo Lee, Seong Joo Kim, Jae Hyun Suh, In Suck |
author_facet | Kim, Seong Hwan Lee, Ju Ho Kim, Seong Eun Shin, Se Ho Kim, Hyeon Jo Lee, Seong Joo Kim, Jae Hyun Suh, In Suck |
author_sort | Kim, Seong Hwan |
collection | PubMed |
description | If wounds are infected with bacteria resistant to an empirical antibiotic regimen, effective wound treatment will be delayed. This can delay wound healing and lengthen hospital stays, increasing the costs to patients. Long-term antibiotic use can also result in minor and major complications, such as diarrhea, antibiotic resistance, or life-threatening leukopenia. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria make wound treatment even more difficult. Traditionally, surgeons thought that adequate infection control should be established before soft tissue coverage. However, wounds infected by MDR do not heal well with this traditional method and there are no optimal treatment guidelines for MDR bacteria-contaminated wounds. We reviewed 203 patients who underwent vascularized flap surgery from 2012 to 2019 to cover wounds. Class IV and I wounds were compared according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention classification. Class IV was further classified as antibiotic-resistant (ARB) and antibiotic-sensitive (ASB) bacteria. Wound size, mode, location, pathogens, healing time, and basic demographics were evaluated. Data were compared using Cramer's V and one-way ANOVA or independent t tests. The average healing time was longer in the ARB (19.7 [range 7–44] days) and ASB (17.9 [range 2–36] days) groups than in the Clean group (16.5 [range 7–28] days). Healing time differed in the 3 groups (P = .036). It was longer in the class IV group than in the class I group (P = .01). However, it was not statistically different between the ARB and ASB groups (P = .164). In our study the difference in healing time was small when vascularized tissue transfer was done in ARB-infected wound compared with ASB-infected and clean wound. It is necessary to perform surgery using vascularized tissue for the infected wound of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8202535 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82025352021-06-15 Retrospective study of the efficacy of vascularized tissue transfer for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria-infected wound: Comparison with clean and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria-infected wound Kim, Seong Hwan Lee, Ju Ho Kim, Seong Eun Shin, Se Ho Kim, Hyeon Jo Lee, Seong Joo Kim, Jae Hyun Suh, In Suck Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 If wounds are infected with bacteria resistant to an empirical antibiotic regimen, effective wound treatment will be delayed. This can delay wound healing and lengthen hospital stays, increasing the costs to patients. Long-term antibiotic use can also result in minor and major complications, such as diarrhea, antibiotic resistance, or life-threatening leukopenia. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria make wound treatment even more difficult. Traditionally, surgeons thought that adequate infection control should be established before soft tissue coverage. However, wounds infected by MDR do not heal well with this traditional method and there are no optimal treatment guidelines for MDR bacteria-contaminated wounds. We reviewed 203 patients who underwent vascularized flap surgery from 2012 to 2019 to cover wounds. Class IV and I wounds were compared according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention classification. Class IV was further classified as antibiotic-resistant (ARB) and antibiotic-sensitive (ASB) bacteria. Wound size, mode, location, pathogens, healing time, and basic demographics were evaluated. Data were compared using Cramer's V and one-way ANOVA or independent t tests. The average healing time was longer in the ARB (19.7 [range 7–44] days) and ASB (17.9 [range 2–36] days) groups than in the Clean group (16.5 [range 7–28] days). Healing time differed in the 3 groups (P = .036). It was longer in the class IV group than in the class I group (P = .01). However, it was not statistically different between the ARB and ASB groups (P = .164). In our study the difference in healing time was small when vascularized tissue transfer was done in ARB-infected wound compared with ASB-infected and clean wound. It is necessary to perform surgery using vascularized tissue for the infected wound of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8202535/ /pubmed/34114986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025907 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 7100 Kim, Seong Hwan Lee, Ju Ho Kim, Seong Eun Shin, Se Ho Kim, Hyeon Jo Lee, Seong Joo Kim, Jae Hyun Suh, In Suck Retrospective study of the efficacy of vascularized tissue transfer for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria-infected wound: Comparison with clean and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria-infected wound |
title | Retrospective study of the efficacy of vascularized tissue transfer for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria-infected wound: Comparison with clean and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria-infected wound |
title_full | Retrospective study of the efficacy of vascularized tissue transfer for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria-infected wound: Comparison with clean and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria-infected wound |
title_fullStr | Retrospective study of the efficacy of vascularized tissue transfer for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria-infected wound: Comparison with clean and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria-infected wound |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective study of the efficacy of vascularized tissue transfer for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria-infected wound: Comparison with clean and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria-infected wound |
title_short | Retrospective study of the efficacy of vascularized tissue transfer for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria-infected wound: Comparison with clean and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria-infected wound |
title_sort | retrospective study of the efficacy of vascularized tissue transfer for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria-infected wound: comparison with clean and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria-infected wound |
topic | 7100 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34114986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025907 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimseonghwan retrospectivestudyoftheefficacyofvascularizedtissuetransferfortreatingantibioticresistantbacteriainfectedwoundcomparisonwithcleanandantibioticsensitivebacteriainfectedwound AT leejuho retrospectivestudyoftheefficacyofvascularizedtissuetransferfortreatingantibioticresistantbacteriainfectedwoundcomparisonwithcleanandantibioticsensitivebacteriainfectedwound AT kimseongeun retrospectivestudyoftheefficacyofvascularizedtissuetransferfortreatingantibioticresistantbacteriainfectedwoundcomparisonwithcleanandantibioticsensitivebacteriainfectedwound AT shinseho retrospectivestudyoftheefficacyofvascularizedtissuetransferfortreatingantibioticresistantbacteriainfectedwoundcomparisonwithcleanandantibioticsensitivebacteriainfectedwound AT kimhyeonjo retrospectivestudyoftheefficacyofvascularizedtissuetransferfortreatingantibioticresistantbacteriainfectedwoundcomparisonwithcleanandantibioticsensitivebacteriainfectedwound AT leeseongjoo retrospectivestudyoftheefficacyofvascularizedtissuetransferfortreatingantibioticresistantbacteriainfectedwoundcomparisonwithcleanandantibioticsensitivebacteriainfectedwound AT kimjaehyun retrospectivestudyoftheefficacyofvascularizedtissuetransferfortreatingantibioticresistantbacteriainfectedwoundcomparisonwithcleanandantibioticsensitivebacteriainfectedwound AT suhinsuck retrospectivestudyoftheefficacyofvascularizedtissuetransferfortreatingantibioticresistantbacteriainfectedwoundcomparisonwithcleanandantibioticsensitivebacteriainfectedwound |