Cargando…

Predicting ventilator-associated pneumonia with machine learning

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common and fatal nosocomial infection in intensive care units (ICUs). Existing methods for identifying VAP display low accuracy, and their use may delay antimicrobial therapy. VAP diagnostics derived from machine learning (ML) methods that utilize el...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giang, Christine, Calvert, Jacob, Rahmani, Keyvan, Barnes, Gina, Siefkas, Anna, Green-Saxena, Abigail, Hoffman, Jana, Mao, Qingqing, Das, Ritankar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34115013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026246
_version_ 1783708006474579968
author Giang, Christine
Calvert, Jacob
Rahmani, Keyvan
Barnes, Gina
Siefkas, Anna
Green-Saxena, Abigail
Hoffman, Jana
Mao, Qingqing
Das, Ritankar
author_facet Giang, Christine
Calvert, Jacob
Rahmani, Keyvan
Barnes, Gina
Siefkas, Anna
Green-Saxena, Abigail
Hoffman, Jana
Mao, Qingqing
Das, Ritankar
author_sort Giang, Christine
collection PubMed
description Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common and fatal nosocomial infection in intensive care units (ICUs). Existing methods for identifying VAP display low accuracy, and their use may delay antimicrobial therapy. VAP diagnostics derived from machine learning (ML) methods that utilize electronic health record (EHR) data have not yet been explored. The objective of this study is to compare the performance of a variety of ML models trained to predict whether VAP will be diagnosed during the patient stay. A retrospective study examined data from 6126 adult ICU encounters lasting at least 48 hours following the initiation of mechanical ventilation. The gold standard was the presence of a diagnostic code for VAP. Five different ML models were trained to predict VAP 48 hours after initiation of mechanical ventilation. Model performance was evaluated with regard to the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve on a 20% hold-out test set. Feature importance was measured in terms of Shapley values. The highest performing model achieved an AUROC value of 0.854. The most important features for the best-performing model were the length of time on mechanical ventilation, the presence of antibiotics, sputum test frequency, and the most recent Glasgow Coma Scale assessment. Supervised ML using patient EHR data is promising for VAP diagnosis and warrants further validation. This tool has the potential to aid the timely diagnosis of VAP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8202554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82025542021-06-15 Predicting ventilator-associated pneumonia with machine learning Giang, Christine Calvert, Jacob Rahmani, Keyvan Barnes, Gina Siefkas, Anna Green-Saxena, Abigail Hoffman, Jana Mao, Qingqing Das, Ritankar Medicine (Baltimore) 6700 Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common and fatal nosocomial infection in intensive care units (ICUs). Existing methods for identifying VAP display low accuracy, and their use may delay antimicrobial therapy. VAP diagnostics derived from machine learning (ML) methods that utilize electronic health record (EHR) data have not yet been explored. The objective of this study is to compare the performance of a variety of ML models trained to predict whether VAP will be diagnosed during the patient stay. A retrospective study examined data from 6126 adult ICU encounters lasting at least 48 hours following the initiation of mechanical ventilation. The gold standard was the presence of a diagnostic code for VAP. Five different ML models were trained to predict VAP 48 hours after initiation of mechanical ventilation. Model performance was evaluated with regard to the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve on a 20% hold-out test set. Feature importance was measured in terms of Shapley values. The highest performing model achieved an AUROC value of 0.854. The most important features for the best-performing model were the length of time on mechanical ventilation, the presence of antibiotics, sputum test frequency, and the most recent Glasgow Coma Scale assessment. Supervised ML using patient EHR data is promising for VAP diagnosis and warrants further validation. This tool has the potential to aid the timely diagnosis of VAP. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8202554/ /pubmed/34115013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026246 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle 6700
Giang, Christine
Calvert, Jacob
Rahmani, Keyvan
Barnes, Gina
Siefkas, Anna
Green-Saxena, Abigail
Hoffman, Jana
Mao, Qingqing
Das, Ritankar
Predicting ventilator-associated pneumonia with machine learning
title Predicting ventilator-associated pneumonia with machine learning
title_full Predicting ventilator-associated pneumonia with machine learning
title_fullStr Predicting ventilator-associated pneumonia with machine learning
title_full_unstemmed Predicting ventilator-associated pneumonia with machine learning
title_short Predicting ventilator-associated pneumonia with machine learning
title_sort predicting ventilator-associated pneumonia with machine learning
topic 6700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34115013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026246
work_keys_str_mv AT giangchristine predictingventilatorassociatedpneumoniawithmachinelearning
AT calvertjacob predictingventilatorassociatedpneumoniawithmachinelearning
AT rahmanikeyvan predictingventilatorassociatedpneumoniawithmachinelearning
AT barnesgina predictingventilatorassociatedpneumoniawithmachinelearning
AT siefkasanna predictingventilatorassociatedpneumoniawithmachinelearning
AT greensaxenaabigail predictingventilatorassociatedpneumoniawithmachinelearning
AT hoffmanjana predictingventilatorassociatedpneumoniawithmachinelearning
AT maoqingqing predictingventilatorassociatedpneumoniawithmachinelearning
AT dasritankar predictingventilatorassociatedpneumoniawithmachinelearning