Cargando…

Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Supported by Impella: Implications of Advanced Age and Refractory Shock on Outcomes

OBJECTIVES: With percutaneous left ventricular mechanical circulatory support devices becoming increasingly available for patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction and the lack of a clear mortality benefit to date, identifying optimal candidates for this technology is crucia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boshara, Andrew, Patel, Ami, Alasaad, Mohammad, Dutcheshen, Karey J., LaLonde, Thomas A., Schreiber, Theodore L., Mehta, Rajendra H., Kaki, Amir, Rosman, Howard S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000447
_version_ 1783708025629966336
author Boshara, Andrew
Patel, Ami
Alasaad, Mohammad
Dutcheshen, Karey J.
LaLonde, Thomas A.
Schreiber, Theodore L.
Mehta, Rajendra H.
Kaki, Amir
Rosman, Howard S.
author_facet Boshara, Andrew
Patel, Ami
Alasaad, Mohammad
Dutcheshen, Karey J.
LaLonde, Thomas A.
Schreiber, Theodore L.
Mehta, Rajendra H.
Kaki, Amir
Rosman, Howard S.
author_sort Boshara, Andrew
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: With percutaneous left ventricular mechanical circulatory support devices becoming increasingly available for patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction and the lack of a clear mortality benefit to date, identifying optimal candidates for this technology is crucial. We studied the effectiveness of Impella Cardiac Pow (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) in various stages of cardiogenic shock and elderly cohorts. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Data were collected for patients at a single community hospital between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. SUBJECTS: Thirty-one consecutive adult patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction who received Impella Cardiac Pow support. Shock stages were defined by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (Stages A–E). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was in-hospital death across Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention cardiogenic shock stages and in patients greater than or equal to 80 and less than 80 years old. Secondary outcomes were Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 vascular and bleeding complications, stroke, and renal failure requiring dialysis. The median age of the study population was 64 years, with seven patients (23%) being greater than or equal to 80 years old. No patients were in Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention Stage A, whereas there were seven in B, eight in C, six in D, and 10 (32%) in E. Overall in-hospital mortality occurred in 61% of patients. All 10 patients in Stage E died before hospital discharge. Mortality occurred in 54% of patients (13/24) age less than 80 years compared with 86% of those 80 years or older (6/7). A total of 38.7% of patients (12/31) and 32.3% of patients (10/31) experienced Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 bleeding and vascular events, which were evenly distributed across Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention cardiogenic shock Stages. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, patients with shock in extremis and those 80 years old and older may have a prohibitively high mortality despite Impella use. These findings merit further prospective investigation in a larger number of patients to evaluate the effectiveness of Impella (and other left ventricular mechanical circulatory devices) and the inherent resource utilization in advanced cardiogenic shock and the elderly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8202667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82026672021-06-15 Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Supported by Impella: Implications of Advanced Age and Refractory Shock on Outcomes Boshara, Andrew Patel, Ami Alasaad, Mohammad Dutcheshen, Karey J. LaLonde, Thomas A. Schreiber, Theodore L. Mehta, Rajendra H. Kaki, Amir Rosman, Howard S. Crit Care Explor Original Clinical Report OBJECTIVES: With percutaneous left ventricular mechanical circulatory support devices becoming increasingly available for patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction and the lack of a clear mortality benefit to date, identifying optimal candidates for this technology is crucial. We studied the effectiveness of Impella Cardiac Pow (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) in various stages of cardiogenic shock and elderly cohorts. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Data were collected for patients at a single community hospital between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. SUBJECTS: Thirty-one consecutive adult patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction who received Impella Cardiac Pow support. Shock stages were defined by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (Stages A–E). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was in-hospital death across Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention cardiogenic shock stages and in patients greater than or equal to 80 and less than 80 years old. Secondary outcomes were Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 vascular and bleeding complications, stroke, and renal failure requiring dialysis. The median age of the study population was 64 years, with seven patients (23%) being greater than or equal to 80 years old. No patients were in Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention Stage A, whereas there were seven in B, eight in C, six in D, and 10 (32%) in E. Overall in-hospital mortality occurred in 61% of patients. All 10 patients in Stage E died before hospital discharge. Mortality occurred in 54% of patients (13/24) age less than 80 years compared with 86% of those 80 years or older (6/7). A total of 38.7% of patients (12/31) and 32.3% of patients (10/31) experienced Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 bleeding and vascular events, which were evenly distributed across Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention cardiogenic shock Stages. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, patients with shock in extremis and those 80 years old and older may have a prohibitively high mortality despite Impella use. These findings merit further prospective investigation in a larger number of patients to evaluate the effectiveness of Impella (and other left ventricular mechanical circulatory devices) and the inherent resource utilization in advanced cardiogenic shock and the elderly. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8202667/ /pubmed/34136823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000447 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Report
Boshara, Andrew
Patel, Ami
Alasaad, Mohammad
Dutcheshen, Karey J.
LaLonde, Thomas A.
Schreiber, Theodore L.
Mehta, Rajendra H.
Kaki, Amir
Rosman, Howard S.
Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Supported by Impella: Implications of Advanced Age and Refractory Shock on Outcomes
title Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Supported by Impella: Implications of Advanced Age and Refractory Shock on Outcomes
title_full Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Supported by Impella: Implications of Advanced Age and Refractory Shock on Outcomes
title_fullStr Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Supported by Impella: Implications of Advanced Age and Refractory Shock on Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Supported by Impella: Implications of Advanced Age and Refractory Shock on Outcomes
title_short Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Supported by Impella: Implications of Advanced Age and Refractory Shock on Outcomes
title_sort cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention supported by impella: implications of advanced age and refractory shock on outcomes
topic Original Clinical Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000447
work_keys_str_mv AT bosharaandrew cardiogenicshockcomplicatingacutemyocardialinfarctiontreatedwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsupportedbyimpellaimplicationsofadvancedageandrefractoryshockonoutcomes
AT patelami cardiogenicshockcomplicatingacutemyocardialinfarctiontreatedwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsupportedbyimpellaimplicationsofadvancedageandrefractoryshockonoutcomes
AT alasaadmohammad cardiogenicshockcomplicatingacutemyocardialinfarctiontreatedwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsupportedbyimpellaimplicationsofadvancedageandrefractoryshockonoutcomes
AT dutcheshenkareyj cardiogenicshockcomplicatingacutemyocardialinfarctiontreatedwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsupportedbyimpellaimplicationsofadvancedageandrefractoryshockonoutcomes
AT lalondethomasa cardiogenicshockcomplicatingacutemyocardialinfarctiontreatedwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsupportedbyimpellaimplicationsofadvancedageandrefractoryshockonoutcomes
AT schreibertheodorel cardiogenicshockcomplicatingacutemyocardialinfarctiontreatedwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsupportedbyimpellaimplicationsofadvancedageandrefractoryshockonoutcomes
AT mehtarajendrah cardiogenicshockcomplicatingacutemyocardialinfarctiontreatedwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsupportedbyimpellaimplicationsofadvancedageandrefractoryshockonoutcomes
AT kakiamir cardiogenicshockcomplicatingacutemyocardialinfarctiontreatedwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsupportedbyimpellaimplicationsofadvancedageandrefractoryshockonoutcomes
AT rosmanhowards cardiogenicshockcomplicatingacutemyocardialinfarctiontreatedwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsupportedbyimpellaimplicationsofadvancedageandrefractoryshockonoutcomes