Cargando…

Yet Another Automated Gleason Grading System (YAAGGS) by weakly supervised deep learning

The Gleason score contributes significantly in predicting prostate cancer outcomes and selecting the appropriate treatment option, which is affected by well-known inter-observer variations. We present a novel deep learning-based automated Gleason grading system that does not require extensive region...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mun, Yechan, Paik, Inyoung, Shin, Su-Jin, Kwak, Tae-Yeong, Chang, Hyeyoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8203612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34127777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00469-6
_version_ 1783708204236013568
author Mun, Yechan
Paik, Inyoung
Shin, Su-Jin
Kwak, Tae-Yeong
Chang, Hyeyoon
author_facet Mun, Yechan
Paik, Inyoung
Shin, Su-Jin
Kwak, Tae-Yeong
Chang, Hyeyoon
author_sort Mun, Yechan
collection PubMed
description The Gleason score contributes significantly in predicting prostate cancer outcomes and selecting the appropriate treatment option, which is affected by well-known inter-observer variations. We present a novel deep learning-based automated Gleason grading system that does not require extensive region-level manual annotations by experts and/or complex algorithms for the automatic generation of region-level annotations. A total of 6664 and 936 prostate needle biopsy single-core slides (689 and 99 cases) from two institutions were used for system discovery and validation, respectively. Pathological diagnoses were converted into grade groups and used as the reference standard. The grade group prediction accuracy of the system was 77.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 72.3–82.7%), the Cohen’s kappa score (κ) was 0.650 (95% CI: 0.570–0.730), and the quadratic-weighted kappa score (κ(quad)) was 0.897 (95% CI: 0.815–0.979). When trained on 621 cases from one institution and validated on 167 cases from the other institution, the system’s accuracy reached 67.4% (95% CI: 63.2–71.6%), κ 0.553 (95% CI: 0.495–0.610), and the κ(quad) 0.880 (95% CI: 0.822–0.938). In order to evaluate the impact of the proposed method, performance comparison with several baseline methods was also performed. While limited by case volume and a few more factors, the results of this study can contribute to the potential development of an artificial intelligence system to diagnose other cancers without extensive region-level annotations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8203612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82036122021-07-01 Yet Another Automated Gleason Grading System (YAAGGS) by weakly supervised deep learning Mun, Yechan Paik, Inyoung Shin, Su-Jin Kwak, Tae-Yeong Chang, Hyeyoon NPJ Digit Med Article The Gleason score contributes significantly in predicting prostate cancer outcomes and selecting the appropriate treatment option, which is affected by well-known inter-observer variations. We present a novel deep learning-based automated Gleason grading system that does not require extensive region-level manual annotations by experts and/or complex algorithms for the automatic generation of region-level annotations. A total of 6664 and 936 prostate needle biopsy single-core slides (689 and 99 cases) from two institutions were used for system discovery and validation, respectively. Pathological diagnoses were converted into grade groups and used as the reference standard. The grade group prediction accuracy of the system was 77.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 72.3–82.7%), the Cohen’s kappa score (κ) was 0.650 (95% CI: 0.570–0.730), and the quadratic-weighted kappa score (κ(quad)) was 0.897 (95% CI: 0.815–0.979). When trained on 621 cases from one institution and validated on 167 cases from the other institution, the system’s accuracy reached 67.4% (95% CI: 63.2–71.6%), κ 0.553 (95% CI: 0.495–0.610), and the κ(quad) 0.880 (95% CI: 0.822–0.938). In order to evaluate the impact of the proposed method, performance comparison with several baseline methods was also performed. While limited by case volume and a few more factors, the results of this study can contribute to the potential development of an artificial intelligence system to diagnose other cancers without extensive region-level annotations. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8203612/ /pubmed/34127777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00469-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Mun, Yechan
Paik, Inyoung
Shin, Su-Jin
Kwak, Tae-Yeong
Chang, Hyeyoon
Yet Another Automated Gleason Grading System (YAAGGS) by weakly supervised deep learning
title Yet Another Automated Gleason Grading System (YAAGGS) by weakly supervised deep learning
title_full Yet Another Automated Gleason Grading System (YAAGGS) by weakly supervised deep learning
title_fullStr Yet Another Automated Gleason Grading System (YAAGGS) by weakly supervised deep learning
title_full_unstemmed Yet Another Automated Gleason Grading System (YAAGGS) by weakly supervised deep learning
title_short Yet Another Automated Gleason Grading System (YAAGGS) by weakly supervised deep learning
title_sort yet another automated gleason grading system (yaaggs) by weakly supervised deep learning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8203612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34127777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00469-6
work_keys_str_mv AT munyechan yetanotherautomatedgleasongradingsystemyaaggsbyweaklysuperviseddeeplearning
AT paikinyoung yetanotherautomatedgleasongradingsystemyaaggsbyweaklysuperviseddeeplearning
AT shinsujin yetanotherautomatedgleasongradingsystemyaaggsbyweaklysuperviseddeeplearning
AT kwaktaeyeong yetanotherautomatedgleasongradingsystemyaaggsbyweaklysuperviseddeeplearning
AT changhyeyoon yetanotherautomatedgleasongradingsystemyaaggsbyweaklysuperviseddeeplearning