Cargando…
Cross-cohort generalizability of deep and conventional machine learning for MRI-based diagnosis and prediction of Alzheimer’s disease
This work validates the generalizability of MRI-based classification of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and controls (CN) to an external data set and to the task of prediction of conversion to AD in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We used a conventional support vector machine (SV...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8203808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34118592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102712 |
_version_ | 1783708247110189056 |
---|---|
author | Bron, Esther E. Klein, Stefan Papma, Janne M. Jiskoot, Lize C. Venkatraghavan, Vikram Linders, Jara Aalten, Pauline De Deyn, Peter Paul Biessels, Geert Jan Claassen, Jurgen A.H.R. Middelkoop, Huub A.M. Smits, Marion Niessen, Wiro J. van Swieten, John C. van der Flier, Wiesje M. Ramakers, Inez H.G.B. van der Lugt, Aad |
author_facet | Bron, Esther E. Klein, Stefan Papma, Janne M. Jiskoot, Lize C. Venkatraghavan, Vikram Linders, Jara Aalten, Pauline De Deyn, Peter Paul Biessels, Geert Jan Claassen, Jurgen A.H.R. Middelkoop, Huub A.M. Smits, Marion Niessen, Wiro J. van Swieten, John C. van der Flier, Wiesje M. Ramakers, Inez H.G.B. van der Lugt, Aad |
author_sort | Bron, Esther E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This work validates the generalizability of MRI-based classification of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and controls (CN) to an external data set and to the task of prediction of conversion to AD in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We used a conventional support vector machine (SVM) and a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) approach based on structural MRI scans that underwent either minimal pre-processing or more extensive pre-processing into modulated gray matter (GM) maps. Classifiers were optimized and evaluated using cross-validation in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; 334 AD, 520 CN). Trained classifiers were subsequently applied to predict conversion to AD in ADNI MCI patients (231 converters, 628 non-converters) and in the independent Health-RI Parelsnoer Neurodegenerative Diseases Biobank data set. From this multi-center study representing a tertiary memory clinic population, we included 199 AD patients, 139 participants with subjective cognitive decline, 48 MCI patients converting to dementia, and 91 MCI patients who did not convert to dementia. AD-CN classification based on modulated GM maps resulted in a similar area-under-the-curve (AUC) for SVM (0.940; 95%CI: 0.924–0.955) and CNN (0.933; 95%CI: 0.918–0.948). Application to conversion prediction in MCI yielded significantly higher performance for SVM (AUC = 0.756; [Formula: see text] CI: [Formula: see text]) than for CNN (AUC = 0.742; [Formula: see text] CI: [Formula: see text]) ([Formula: see text] for McNemar’s test). In external validation, performance was slightly decreased. For AD-CN, it again gave similar AUCs for SVM (0.896; 95%CI: 0.855–0.932) and CNN (0.876; 95%CI: 0.836–0.913). For prediction in MCI, performances decreased for both SVM (AUC = 0.665; [Formula: see text]: [Formula: see text]) and CNN (AUC = 0.702; [Formula: see text] CI: [Formula: see text]). Both with SVM and CNN, classification based on modulated GM maps significantly outperformed classification based on minimally processed images ([Formula: see text]. Deep and conventional classifiers performed equally well for AD classification and their performance decreased only slightly when applied to the external cohort. We expect that this work on external validation contributes towards translation of machine learning to clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8203808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82038082021-06-21 Cross-cohort generalizability of deep and conventional machine learning for MRI-based diagnosis and prediction of Alzheimer’s disease Bron, Esther E. Klein, Stefan Papma, Janne M. Jiskoot, Lize C. Venkatraghavan, Vikram Linders, Jara Aalten, Pauline De Deyn, Peter Paul Biessels, Geert Jan Claassen, Jurgen A.H.R. Middelkoop, Huub A.M. Smits, Marion Niessen, Wiro J. van Swieten, John C. van der Flier, Wiesje M. Ramakers, Inez H.G.B. van der Lugt, Aad Neuroimage Clin Regular Article This work validates the generalizability of MRI-based classification of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and controls (CN) to an external data set and to the task of prediction of conversion to AD in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We used a conventional support vector machine (SVM) and a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) approach based on structural MRI scans that underwent either minimal pre-processing or more extensive pre-processing into modulated gray matter (GM) maps. Classifiers were optimized and evaluated using cross-validation in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; 334 AD, 520 CN). Trained classifiers were subsequently applied to predict conversion to AD in ADNI MCI patients (231 converters, 628 non-converters) and in the independent Health-RI Parelsnoer Neurodegenerative Diseases Biobank data set. From this multi-center study representing a tertiary memory clinic population, we included 199 AD patients, 139 participants with subjective cognitive decline, 48 MCI patients converting to dementia, and 91 MCI patients who did not convert to dementia. AD-CN classification based on modulated GM maps resulted in a similar area-under-the-curve (AUC) for SVM (0.940; 95%CI: 0.924–0.955) and CNN (0.933; 95%CI: 0.918–0.948). Application to conversion prediction in MCI yielded significantly higher performance for SVM (AUC = 0.756; [Formula: see text] CI: [Formula: see text]) than for CNN (AUC = 0.742; [Formula: see text] CI: [Formula: see text]) ([Formula: see text] for McNemar’s test). In external validation, performance was slightly decreased. For AD-CN, it again gave similar AUCs for SVM (0.896; 95%CI: 0.855–0.932) and CNN (0.876; 95%CI: 0.836–0.913). For prediction in MCI, performances decreased for both SVM (AUC = 0.665; [Formula: see text]: [Formula: see text]) and CNN (AUC = 0.702; [Formula: see text] CI: [Formula: see text]). Both with SVM and CNN, classification based on modulated GM maps significantly outperformed classification based on minimally processed images ([Formula: see text]. Deep and conventional classifiers performed equally well for AD classification and their performance decreased only slightly when applied to the external cohort. We expect that this work on external validation contributes towards translation of machine learning to clinical practice. Elsevier 2021-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8203808/ /pubmed/34118592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102712 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Bron, Esther E. Klein, Stefan Papma, Janne M. Jiskoot, Lize C. Venkatraghavan, Vikram Linders, Jara Aalten, Pauline De Deyn, Peter Paul Biessels, Geert Jan Claassen, Jurgen A.H.R. Middelkoop, Huub A.M. Smits, Marion Niessen, Wiro J. van Swieten, John C. van der Flier, Wiesje M. Ramakers, Inez H.G.B. van der Lugt, Aad Cross-cohort generalizability of deep and conventional machine learning for MRI-based diagnosis and prediction of Alzheimer’s disease |
title | Cross-cohort generalizability of deep and conventional machine learning for MRI-based diagnosis and prediction of Alzheimer’s disease |
title_full | Cross-cohort generalizability of deep and conventional machine learning for MRI-based diagnosis and prediction of Alzheimer’s disease |
title_fullStr | Cross-cohort generalizability of deep and conventional machine learning for MRI-based diagnosis and prediction of Alzheimer’s disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Cross-cohort generalizability of deep and conventional machine learning for MRI-based diagnosis and prediction of Alzheimer’s disease |
title_short | Cross-cohort generalizability of deep and conventional machine learning for MRI-based diagnosis and prediction of Alzheimer’s disease |
title_sort | cross-cohort generalizability of deep and conventional machine learning for mri-based diagnosis and prediction of alzheimer’s disease |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8203808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34118592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102712 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bronesthere crosscohortgeneralizabilityofdeepandconventionalmachinelearningformribaseddiagnosisandpredictionofalzheimersdisease AT kleinstefan crosscohortgeneralizabilityofdeepandconventionalmachinelearningformribaseddiagnosisandpredictionofalzheimersdisease AT papmajannem crosscohortgeneralizabilityofdeepandconventionalmachinelearningformribaseddiagnosisandpredictionofalzheimersdisease AT jiskootlizec crosscohortgeneralizabilityofdeepandconventionalmachinelearningformribaseddiagnosisandpredictionofalzheimersdisease AT venkatraghavanvikram crosscohortgeneralizabilityofdeepandconventionalmachinelearningformribaseddiagnosisandpredictionofalzheimersdisease AT lindersjara crosscohortgeneralizabilityofdeepandconventionalmachinelearningformribaseddiagnosisandpredictionofalzheimersdisease AT aaltenpauline crosscohortgeneralizabilityofdeepandconventionalmachinelearningformribaseddiagnosisandpredictionofalzheimersdisease AT dedeynpeterpaul crosscohortgeneralizabilityofdeepandconventionalmachinelearningformribaseddiagnosisandpredictionofalzheimersdisease AT biesselsgeertjan crosscohortgeneralizabilityofdeepandconventionalmachinelearningformribaseddiagnosisandpredictionofalzheimersdisease AT claassenjurgenahr crosscohortgeneralizabilityofdeepandconventionalmachinelearningformribaseddiagnosisandpredictionofalzheimersdisease AT middelkoophuubam crosscohortgeneralizabilityofdeepandconventionalmachinelearningformribaseddiagnosisandpredictionofalzheimersdisease AT smitsmarion crosscohortgeneralizabilityofdeepandconventionalmachinelearningformribaseddiagnosisandpredictionofalzheimersdisease AT niessenwiroj crosscohortgeneralizabilityofdeepandconventionalmachinelearningformribaseddiagnosisandpredictionofalzheimersdisease AT vanswietenjohnc crosscohortgeneralizabilityofdeepandconventionalmachinelearningformribaseddiagnosisandpredictionofalzheimersdisease AT vanderflierwiesjem crosscohortgeneralizabilityofdeepandconventionalmachinelearningformribaseddiagnosisandpredictionofalzheimersdisease AT ramakersinezhgb crosscohortgeneralizabilityofdeepandconventionalmachinelearningformribaseddiagnosisandpredictionofalzheimersdisease AT vanderlugtaad crosscohortgeneralizabilityofdeepandconventionalmachinelearningformribaseddiagnosisandpredictionofalzheimersdisease AT crosscohortgeneralizabilityofdeepandconventionalmachinelearningformribaseddiagnosisandpredictionofalzheimersdisease AT crosscohortgeneralizabilityofdeepandconventionalmachinelearningformribaseddiagnosisandpredictionofalzheimersdisease |