Cargando…
The Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Purpose: The meta-analysis aims to identify whether septic shock patients can benefit from esmolol. Materials and Methods: The relevant studies from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase were searched by two independent investigators using a variety of keywords. Stata software (version 12.0, Stata Corp...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8204042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34140891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.682232 |
_version_ | 1783708274684592128 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Po Zheng, Xiangchun Liu, Zhi Fang, Xiaolei |
author_facet | Huang, Po Zheng, Xiangchun Liu, Zhi Fang, Xiaolei |
author_sort | Huang, Po |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: The meta-analysis aims to identify whether septic shock patients can benefit from esmolol. Materials and Methods: The relevant studies from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase were searched by two independent investigators using a variety of keywords. Stata software (version 12.0, Stata Corp LP, College Station, TX, United States)was used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 14 studies were identified and incorporated into the meta-analysis. For overall analysis, the treatment of esmolol was associated with decreased 28-day mortality (RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.56–0.77, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, our analysis found that, esmolol could decrease HR (SMD: −1.70; 95% CI: [−2.24−(−1.17)], cTnI (SMD: −1.61; 95% CI: [−2.06−(−1.16)] compared with standard treatment. No significant differences between the two groups were found in MAP, Lac, CI, and SVI. Conclusion: The findings of this meta-analysis intend to demonstrate that septic shock patients with high heart beats rate might be benefit from esmolol treatment despite enough fluid resuscitation. While, dependent on the study published, with the further development of septic shock, the positive impact of esmolol varies. The appropriate heart rate change interval cannot be confirmed, further high-quality and large-scale RCTs should be performed to verify it and screening more suitable heart rate levels. Systematic Review Registration: CRD42021239513 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8204042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82040422021-06-16 The Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Huang, Po Zheng, Xiangchun Liu, Zhi Fang, Xiaolei Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Purpose: The meta-analysis aims to identify whether septic shock patients can benefit from esmolol. Materials and Methods: The relevant studies from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase were searched by two independent investigators using a variety of keywords. Stata software (version 12.0, Stata Corp LP, College Station, TX, United States)was used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 14 studies were identified and incorporated into the meta-analysis. For overall analysis, the treatment of esmolol was associated with decreased 28-day mortality (RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.56–0.77, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, our analysis found that, esmolol could decrease HR (SMD: −1.70; 95% CI: [−2.24−(−1.17)], cTnI (SMD: −1.61; 95% CI: [−2.06−(−1.16)] compared with standard treatment. No significant differences between the two groups were found in MAP, Lac, CI, and SVI. Conclusion: The findings of this meta-analysis intend to demonstrate that septic shock patients with high heart beats rate might be benefit from esmolol treatment despite enough fluid resuscitation. While, dependent on the study published, with the further development of septic shock, the positive impact of esmolol varies. The appropriate heart rate change interval cannot be confirmed, further high-quality and large-scale RCTs should be performed to verify it and screening more suitable heart rate levels. Systematic Review Registration: CRD42021239513 Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8204042/ /pubmed/34140891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.682232 Text en Copyright © 2021 Huang, Zheng, Liu and Fang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Huang, Po Zheng, Xiangchun Liu, Zhi Fang, Xiaolei The Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | The Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | The Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | The Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | The Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of esmolol for septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8204042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34140891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.682232 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangpo theefficacyandsafetyofesmololforsepticshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhengxiangchun theefficacyandsafetyofesmololforsepticshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liuzhi theefficacyandsafetyofesmololforsepticshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT fangxiaolei theefficacyandsafetyofesmololforsepticshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT huangpo efficacyandsafetyofesmololforsepticshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhengxiangchun efficacyandsafetyofesmololforsepticshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liuzhi efficacyandsafetyofesmololforsepticshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT fangxiaolei efficacyandsafetyofesmololforsepticshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |