Cargando…

The Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Purpose: The meta-analysis aims to identify whether septic shock patients can benefit from esmolol. Materials and Methods: The relevant studies from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase were searched by two independent investigators using a variety of keywords. Stata software (version 12.0, Stata Corp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Po, Zheng, Xiangchun, Liu, Zhi, Fang, Xiaolei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8204042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34140891
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.682232
_version_ 1783708274684592128
author Huang, Po
Zheng, Xiangchun
Liu, Zhi
Fang, Xiaolei
author_facet Huang, Po
Zheng, Xiangchun
Liu, Zhi
Fang, Xiaolei
author_sort Huang, Po
collection PubMed
description Purpose: The meta-analysis aims to identify whether septic shock patients can benefit from esmolol. Materials and Methods: The relevant studies from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase were searched by two independent investigators using a variety of keywords. Stata software (version 12.0, Stata Corp LP, College Station, TX, United States)was used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 14 studies were identified and incorporated into the meta-analysis. For overall analysis, the treatment of esmolol was associated with decreased 28-day mortality (RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.56–0.77, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, our analysis found that, esmolol could decrease HR (SMD: −1.70; 95% CI: [−2.24−(−1.17)], cTnI (SMD: −1.61; 95% CI: [−2.06−(−1.16)] compared with standard treatment. No significant differences between the two groups were found in MAP, Lac, CI, and SVI. Conclusion: The findings of this meta-analysis intend to demonstrate that septic shock patients with high heart beats rate might be benefit from esmolol treatment despite enough fluid resuscitation. While, dependent on the study published, with the further development of septic shock, the positive impact of esmolol varies. The appropriate heart rate change interval cannot be confirmed, further high-quality and large-scale RCTs should be performed to verify it and screening more suitable heart rate levels. Systematic Review Registration: CRD42021239513
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8204042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82040422021-06-16 The Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Huang, Po Zheng, Xiangchun Liu, Zhi Fang, Xiaolei Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Purpose: The meta-analysis aims to identify whether septic shock patients can benefit from esmolol. Materials and Methods: The relevant studies from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase were searched by two independent investigators using a variety of keywords. Stata software (version 12.0, Stata Corp LP, College Station, TX, United States)was used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 14 studies were identified and incorporated into the meta-analysis. For overall analysis, the treatment of esmolol was associated with decreased 28-day mortality (RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.56–0.77, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, our analysis found that, esmolol could decrease HR (SMD: −1.70; 95% CI: [−2.24−(−1.17)], cTnI (SMD: −1.61; 95% CI: [−2.06−(−1.16)] compared with standard treatment. No significant differences between the two groups were found in MAP, Lac, CI, and SVI. Conclusion: The findings of this meta-analysis intend to demonstrate that septic shock patients with high heart beats rate might be benefit from esmolol treatment despite enough fluid resuscitation. While, dependent on the study published, with the further development of septic shock, the positive impact of esmolol varies. The appropriate heart rate change interval cannot be confirmed, further high-quality and large-scale RCTs should be performed to verify it and screening more suitable heart rate levels. Systematic Review Registration: CRD42021239513 Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8204042/ /pubmed/34140891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.682232 Text en Copyright © 2021 Huang, Zheng, Liu and Fang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Huang, Po
Zheng, Xiangchun
Liu, Zhi
Fang, Xiaolei
The Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title The Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full The Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr The Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short The Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of esmolol for septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8204042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34140891
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.682232
work_keys_str_mv AT huangpo theefficacyandsafetyofesmololforsepticshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhengxiangchun theefficacyandsafetyofesmololforsepticshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liuzhi theefficacyandsafetyofesmololforsepticshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT fangxiaolei theefficacyandsafetyofesmololforsepticshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huangpo efficacyandsafetyofesmololforsepticshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhengxiangchun efficacyandsafetyofesmololforsepticshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liuzhi efficacyandsafetyofesmololforsepticshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT fangxiaolei efficacyandsafetyofesmololforsepticshockasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials