Cargando…
Handoffs and transitions in critical care—understanding scalability: study protocol for a multicenter stepped wedge type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial
BACKGROUND: The implementation of evidence-based practices in critical care faces specific challenges, including intense time pressure and patient acuity. These challenges result in evidence-to-practice gaps that diminish the impact of proven-effective interventions for patients requiring intensive...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8204062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34130725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01131-1 |
_version_ | 1783708279454564352 |
---|---|
author | Lane-Fall, Meghan B. Christakos, Athena Russell, Gina C. Hose, Bat-Zion Dauer, Elizabeth D. Greilich, Philip E. Hong Mershon, Bommy Potestio, Christopher P. Pukenas, Erin W. Kimberly, John R. Stephens-Shields, Alisa J. Trotta, Rebecca L. Beidas, Rinad S. Bass, Ellen J. |
author_facet | Lane-Fall, Meghan B. Christakos, Athena Russell, Gina C. Hose, Bat-Zion Dauer, Elizabeth D. Greilich, Philip E. Hong Mershon, Bommy Potestio, Christopher P. Pukenas, Erin W. Kimberly, John R. Stephens-Shields, Alisa J. Trotta, Rebecca L. Beidas, Rinad S. Bass, Ellen J. |
author_sort | Lane-Fall, Meghan B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The implementation of evidence-based practices in critical care faces specific challenges, including intense time pressure and patient acuity. These challenges result in evidence-to-practice gaps that diminish the impact of proven-effective interventions for patients requiring intensive care unit support. Research is needed to understand and address implementation determinants in critical care settings. METHODS: The Handoffs and Transitions in Critical Care—Understanding Scalability (HATRICC-US) study is a Type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of standardized operating room (OR) to intensive care unit (ICU) handoffs. This mixed methods study will use a stepped wedge design with randomized roll out to test the effectiveness of a customized protocol for structuring communication between clinicians in the OR and the ICU. The study will be conducted in twelve ICUs (10 adult, 2 pediatric) based in five United States academic health systems. Contextual inquiry incorporating implementation science, systems engineering, and human factors engineering approaches will guide both protocol customization and identification of protocol implementation determinants. Implementation mapping will be used to select appropriate implementation strategies for each setting. Human-centered design will be used to create a digital toolkit for dissemination of study findings. The primary implementation outcome will be fidelity to the customized handoff protocol (unit of analysis: handoff). The primary effectiveness outcome will be a composite measure of new-onset organ failure cases (unit of analysis: ICU). DISCUSSION: The HATRICC-US study will customize, implement, and evaluate standardized procedures for OR to ICU handoffs in a heterogenous group of United States academic medical center intensive care units. Findings from this study have the potential to improve postsurgical communication, decrease adverse clinical outcomes, and inform the implementation of other evidence-based practices in critical care settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04571749. Date of registration: October 1, 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-021-01131-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8204062 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82040622021-06-15 Handoffs and transitions in critical care—understanding scalability: study protocol for a multicenter stepped wedge type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial Lane-Fall, Meghan B. Christakos, Athena Russell, Gina C. Hose, Bat-Zion Dauer, Elizabeth D. Greilich, Philip E. Hong Mershon, Bommy Potestio, Christopher P. Pukenas, Erin W. Kimberly, John R. Stephens-Shields, Alisa J. Trotta, Rebecca L. Beidas, Rinad S. Bass, Ellen J. Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The implementation of evidence-based practices in critical care faces specific challenges, including intense time pressure and patient acuity. These challenges result in evidence-to-practice gaps that diminish the impact of proven-effective interventions for patients requiring intensive care unit support. Research is needed to understand and address implementation determinants in critical care settings. METHODS: The Handoffs and Transitions in Critical Care—Understanding Scalability (HATRICC-US) study is a Type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of standardized operating room (OR) to intensive care unit (ICU) handoffs. This mixed methods study will use a stepped wedge design with randomized roll out to test the effectiveness of a customized protocol for structuring communication between clinicians in the OR and the ICU. The study will be conducted in twelve ICUs (10 adult, 2 pediatric) based in five United States academic health systems. Contextual inquiry incorporating implementation science, systems engineering, and human factors engineering approaches will guide both protocol customization and identification of protocol implementation determinants. Implementation mapping will be used to select appropriate implementation strategies for each setting. Human-centered design will be used to create a digital toolkit for dissemination of study findings. The primary implementation outcome will be fidelity to the customized handoff protocol (unit of analysis: handoff). The primary effectiveness outcome will be a composite measure of new-onset organ failure cases (unit of analysis: ICU). DISCUSSION: The HATRICC-US study will customize, implement, and evaluate standardized procedures for OR to ICU handoffs in a heterogenous group of United States academic medical center intensive care units. Findings from this study have the potential to improve postsurgical communication, decrease adverse clinical outcomes, and inform the implementation of other evidence-based practices in critical care settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04571749. Date of registration: October 1, 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-021-01131-1. BioMed Central 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8204062/ /pubmed/34130725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01131-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Lane-Fall, Meghan B. Christakos, Athena Russell, Gina C. Hose, Bat-Zion Dauer, Elizabeth D. Greilich, Philip E. Hong Mershon, Bommy Potestio, Christopher P. Pukenas, Erin W. Kimberly, John R. Stephens-Shields, Alisa J. Trotta, Rebecca L. Beidas, Rinad S. Bass, Ellen J. Handoffs and transitions in critical care—understanding scalability: study protocol for a multicenter stepped wedge type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial |
title | Handoffs and transitions in critical care—understanding scalability: study protocol for a multicenter stepped wedge type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial |
title_full | Handoffs and transitions in critical care—understanding scalability: study protocol for a multicenter stepped wedge type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial |
title_fullStr | Handoffs and transitions in critical care—understanding scalability: study protocol for a multicenter stepped wedge type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Handoffs and transitions in critical care—understanding scalability: study protocol for a multicenter stepped wedge type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial |
title_short | Handoffs and transitions in critical care—understanding scalability: study protocol for a multicenter stepped wedge type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial |
title_sort | handoffs and transitions in critical care—understanding scalability: study protocol for a multicenter stepped wedge type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8204062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34130725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01131-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lanefallmeghanb handoffsandtransitionsincriticalcareunderstandingscalabilitystudyprotocolforamulticentersteppedwedgetype2hybrideffectivenessimplementationtrial AT christakosathena handoffsandtransitionsincriticalcareunderstandingscalabilitystudyprotocolforamulticentersteppedwedgetype2hybrideffectivenessimplementationtrial AT russellginac handoffsandtransitionsincriticalcareunderstandingscalabilitystudyprotocolforamulticentersteppedwedgetype2hybrideffectivenessimplementationtrial AT hosebatzion handoffsandtransitionsincriticalcareunderstandingscalabilitystudyprotocolforamulticentersteppedwedgetype2hybrideffectivenessimplementationtrial AT dauerelizabethd handoffsandtransitionsincriticalcareunderstandingscalabilitystudyprotocolforamulticentersteppedwedgetype2hybrideffectivenessimplementationtrial AT greilichphilipe handoffsandtransitionsincriticalcareunderstandingscalabilitystudyprotocolforamulticentersteppedwedgetype2hybrideffectivenessimplementationtrial AT hongmershonbommy handoffsandtransitionsincriticalcareunderstandingscalabilitystudyprotocolforamulticentersteppedwedgetype2hybrideffectivenessimplementationtrial AT potestiochristopherp handoffsandtransitionsincriticalcareunderstandingscalabilitystudyprotocolforamulticentersteppedwedgetype2hybrideffectivenessimplementationtrial AT pukenaserinw handoffsandtransitionsincriticalcareunderstandingscalabilitystudyprotocolforamulticentersteppedwedgetype2hybrideffectivenessimplementationtrial AT kimberlyjohnr handoffsandtransitionsincriticalcareunderstandingscalabilitystudyprotocolforamulticentersteppedwedgetype2hybrideffectivenessimplementationtrial AT stephensshieldsalisaj handoffsandtransitionsincriticalcareunderstandingscalabilitystudyprotocolforamulticentersteppedwedgetype2hybrideffectivenessimplementationtrial AT trottarebeccal handoffsandtransitionsincriticalcareunderstandingscalabilitystudyprotocolforamulticentersteppedwedgetype2hybrideffectivenessimplementationtrial AT beidasrinads handoffsandtransitionsincriticalcareunderstandingscalabilitystudyprotocolforamulticentersteppedwedgetype2hybrideffectivenessimplementationtrial AT bassellenj handoffsandtransitionsincriticalcareunderstandingscalabilitystudyprotocolforamulticentersteppedwedgetype2hybrideffectivenessimplementationtrial |