Cargando…
Defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries
To sustain competitiveness in contemporary, fast-paced markets, organizations increasingly focus on innovating their business models to enhance current value propositions or to explore novel sources of value creation. However, business model innovation is a complex task, characterized by shifting ch...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8204076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34149341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-021-00894-x |
_version_ | 1783708282656915456 |
---|---|
author | Gilsing, Rick Wilbik, Anna Grefen, Paul Turetken, Oktay Ozkan, Baris Adali, Onat Ege Berkers, Frank |
author_facet | Gilsing, Rick Wilbik, Anna Grefen, Paul Turetken, Oktay Ozkan, Baris Adali, Onat Ege Berkers, Frank |
author_sort | Gilsing, Rick |
collection | PubMed |
description | To sustain competitiveness in contemporary, fast-paced markets, organizations increasingly focus on innovating their business models to enhance current value propositions or to explore novel sources of value creation. However, business model innovation is a complex task, characterized by shifting characteristics in terms of uncertainty, data availability and its impact on decision making. To cope with such challenges, business model evaluation is advocated to make sense of novel business models and to support decision making. Key performance indicators (KPIs) are frequently used in business model evaluation to structure the performance assessment of these models and to evaluate their strategic implications, in turn aiding business model decision making. However, given the shifting characteristics of the innovation process, the application and effectiveness of KPIs depend significantly on how such KPIs are defined. The techniques proposed in the existing literature typically generate or use quantitatively oriented KPIs, which are not well-suited for the early phases of the business model innovation process. Therefore, following a design science research methodology, we have developed a novel method for defining business model KPIs, taking into account the characteristics of the innovation process, offering holistic support toward decision making. Building on theory on linguistic summarization, we use a set of structured templates to define qualitative KPIs that are suitable to support early-phase decision making. In addition, we show how these KPIs can be gradually quantified to support later phases of the innovation process. We have evaluated our method by applying it in two real-life business cases, interviewing 13 industry experts to assess its utility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8204076 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82040762021-06-15 Defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries Gilsing, Rick Wilbik, Anna Grefen, Paul Turetken, Oktay Ozkan, Baris Adali, Onat Ege Berkers, Frank Softw Syst Model Special Section Paper To sustain competitiveness in contemporary, fast-paced markets, organizations increasingly focus on innovating their business models to enhance current value propositions or to explore novel sources of value creation. However, business model innovation is a complex task, characterized by shifting characteristics in terms of uncertainty, data availability and its impact on decision making. To cope with such challenges, business model evaluation is advocated to make sense of novel business models and to support decision making. Key performance indicators (KPIs) are frequently used in business model evaluation to structure the performance assessment of these models and to evaluate their strategic implications, in turn aiding business model decision making. However, given the shifting characteristics of the innovation process, the application and effectiveness of KPIs depend significantly on how such KPIs are defined. The techniques proposed in the existing literature typically generate or use quantitatively oriented KPIs, which are not well-suited for the early phases of the business model innovation process. Therefore, following a design science research methodology, we have developed a novel method for defining business model KPIs, taking into account the characteristics of the innovation process, offering holistic support toward decision making. Building on theory on linguistic summarization, we use a set of structured templates to define qualitative KPIs that are suitable to support early-phase decision making. In addition, we show how these KPIs can be gradually quantified to support later phases of the innovation process. We have evaluated our method by applying it in two real-life business cases, interviewing 13 industry experts to assess its utility. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-15 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8204076/ /pubmed/34149341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-021-00894-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Special Section Paper Gilsing, Rick Wilbik, Anna Grefen, Paul Turetken, Oktay Ozkan, Baris Adali, Onat Ege Berkers, Frank Defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries |
title | Defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries |
title_full | Defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries |
title_fullStr | Defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries |
title_short | Defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries |
title_sort | defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries |
topic | Special Section Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8204076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34149341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-021-00894-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gilsingrick definingbusinessmodelkeyperformanceindicatorsusingintentionallinguisticsummaries AT wilbikanna definingbusinessmodelkeyperformanceindicatorsusingintentionallinguisticsummaries AT grefenpaul definingbusinessmodelkeyperformanceindicatorsusingintentionallinguisticsummaries AT turetkenoktay definingbusinessmodelkeyperformanceindicatorsusingintentionallinguisticsummaries AT ozkanbaris definingbusinessmodelkeyperformanceindicatorsusingintentionallinguisticsummaries AT adalionatege definingbusinessmodelkeyperformanceindicatorsusingintentionallinguisticsummaries AT berkersfrank definingbusinessmodelkeyperformanceindicatorsusingintentionallinguisticsummaries |