Cargando…

Defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries

To sustain competitiveness in contemporary, fast-paced markets, organizations increasingly focus on innovating their business models to enhance current value propositions or to explore novel sources of value creation. However, business model innovation is a complex task, characterized by shifting ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilsing, Rick, Wilbik, Anna, Grefen, Paul, Turetken, Oktay, Ozkan, Baris, Adali, Onat Ege, Berkers, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8204076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34149341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-021-00894-x
_version_ 1783708282656915456
author Gilsing, Rick
Wilbik, Anna
Grefen, Paul
Turetken, Oktay
Ozkan, Baris
Adali, Onat Ege
Berkers, Frank
author_facet Gilsing, Rick
Wilbik, Anna
Grefen, Paul
Turetken, Oktay
Ozkan, Baris
Adali, Onat Ege
Berkers, Frank
author_sort Gilsing, Rick
collection PubMed
description To sustain competitiveness in contemporary, fast-paced markets, organizations increasingly focus on innovating their business models to enhance current value propositions or to explore novel sources of value creation. However, business model innovation is a complex task, characterized by shifting characteristics in terms of uncertainty, data availability and its impact on decision making. To cope with such challenges, business model evaluation is advocated to make sense of novel business models and to support decision making. Key performance indicators (KPIs) are frequently used in business model evaluation to structure the performance assessment of these models and to evaluate their strategic implications, in turn aiding business model decision making. However, given the shifting characteristics of the innovation process, the application and effectiveness of KPIs depend significantly on how such KPIs are defined. The techniques proposed in the existing literature typically generate or use quantitatively oriented KPIs, which are not well-suited for the early phases of the business model innovation process. Therefore, following a design science research methodology, we have developed a novel method for defining business model KPIs, taking into account the characteristics of the innovation process, offering holistic support toward decision making. Building on theory on linguistic summarization, we use a set of structured templates to define qualitative KPIs that are suitable to support early-phase decision making. In addition, we show how these KPIs can be gradually quantified to support later phases of the innovation process. We have evaluated our method by applying it in two real-life business cases, interviewing 13 industry experts to assess its utility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8204076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82040762021-06-15 Defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries Gilsing, Rick Wilbik, Anna Grefen, Paul Turetken, Oktay Ozkan, Baris Adali, Onat Ege Berkers, Frank Softw Syst Model Special Section Paper To sustain competitiveness in contemporary, fast-paced markets, organizations increasingly focus on innovating their business models to enhance current value propositions or to explore novel sources of value creation. However, business model innovation is a complex task, characterized by shifting characteristics in terms of uncertainty, data availability and its impact on decision making. To cope with such challenges, business model evaluation is advocated to make sense of novel business models and to support decision making. Key performance indicators (KPIs) are frequently used in business model evaluation to structure the performance assessment of these models and to evaluate their strategic implications, in turn aiding business model decision making. However, given the shifting characteristics of the innovation process, the application and effectiveness of KPIs depend significantly on how such KPIs are defined. The techniques proposed in the existing literature typically generate or use quantitatively oriented KPIs, which are not well-suited for the early phases of the business model innovation process. Therefore, following a design science research methodology, we have developed a novel method for defining business model KPIs, taking into account the characteristics of the innovation process, offering holistic support toward decision making. Building on theory on linguistic summarization, we use a set of structured templates to define qualitative KPIs that are suitable to support early-phase decision making. In addition, we show how these KPIs can be gradually quantified to support later phases of the innovation process. We have evaluated our method by applying it in two real-life business cases, interviewing 13 industry experts to assess its utility. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-15 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8204076/ /pubmed/34149341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-021-00894-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Special Section Paper
Gilsing, Rick
Wilbik, Anna
Grefen, Paul
Turetken, Oktay
Ozkan, Baris
Adali, Onat Ege
Berkers, Frank
Defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries
title Defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries
title_full Defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries
title_fullStr Defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries
title_full_unstemmed Defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries
title_short Defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries
title_sort defining business model key performance indicators using intentional linguistic summaries
topic Special Section Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8204076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34149341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-021-00894-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gilsingrick definingbusinessmodelkeyperformanceindicatorsusingintentionallinguisticsummaries
AT wilbikanna definingbusinessmodelkeyperformanceindicatorsusingintentionallinguisticsummaries
AT grefenpaul definingbusinessmodelkeyperformanceindicatorsusingintentionallinguisticsummaries
AT turetkenoktay definingbusinessmodelkeyperformanceindicatorsusingintentionallinguisticsummaries
AT ozkanbaris definingbusinessmodelkeyperformanceindicatorsusingintentionallinguisticsummaries
AT adalionatege definingbusinessmodelkeyperformanceindicatorsusingintentionallinguisticsummaries
AT berkersfrank definingbusinessmodelkeyperformanceindicatorsusingintentionallinguisticsummaries