Cargando…
Between-group minimally important change versus individual treatment responders
PURPOSE: Estimates of the minimally important change (MIC) can be used to evaluate whether group-level differences are large enough to be important. But responders to treatment have been based upon group-level MIC thresholds, resulting in inaccurate classification of change over time. This article r...
Autores principales: | Hays, Ron D., Peipert, John Devin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8204732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34129173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02897-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
Methodological considerations in using patient reported measures in dialysis clinics
por: Peipert, John D., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change
por: de Vet, Henrica C, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes
por: Revicki, Dennis A, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Reconsidering tolerability of cancer treatments: opportunities to focus on the patient
por: Peipert, John Devin, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures
por: Terwee, Caroline B., et al.
Publicado: (2021)