Cargando…

Opposing effects of cervical spinal cold block on spinal itch and pain transmission

Inactivation of descending pathways enhanced responses of spinal dorsal horn neurons to noxious stimuli, but little is known regarding tonic descending modulation of spinal itch transmission. To study effects of cervical spinal cold block on responses of dorsal horn neurons to itch-evoking and pain-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carstens, Earl, Carstens, Mirela Iodi, Akiyama, Tasuku, Davoodi, Auva, Nagamine, Masaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8204798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/itx.0000000000000016
_version_ 1783708393015345152
author Carstens, Earl
Carstens, Mirela Iodi
Akiyama, Tasuku
Davoodi, Auva
Nagamine, Masaki
author_facet Carstens, Earl
Carstens, Mirela Iodi
Akiyama, Tasuku
Davoodi, Auva
Nagamine, Masaki
author_sort Carstens, Earl
collection PubMed
description Inactivation of descending pathways enhanced responses of spinal dorsal horn neurons to noxious stimuli, but little is known regarding tonic descending modulation of spinal itch transmission. To study effects of cervical spinal cold block on responses of dorsal horn neurons to itch-evoking and pain-evoking stimuli, single-unit recordings were made from superficial dorsal horn wide dynamic range and nociceptive-specific-type neurons in pentobarbital-anesthetized mice. Intradermal histamine excited 17 units. Cold block starting 1 minute after intradermal injection of histamine caused a marked decrease in firing. The histamine-evoked response during and following cold block was significantly lower compared with control histamine-evoked responses in the absence of cold block. A similar but weaker depressant effect of cold block was observed for dorsal horn unit responses to chloroquine. Twenty-six units responded to mustard oil allyl isothiocyanate (AITC), with a further significant increase in firing during the 1-minute period of cold block beginning 1 minute after AITC application. Activity during cold block was significantly greater compared with the same time period of control responses to AITC in the absence of cold block. Ten units’ responses to noxious heat were significantly enhanced during cold block, while 6 units’ responses were reduced and 18 unaffected. Cold block had no effect on mechanically evoked responses. These results indicate that spinal chemonociceptive transmission is under tonic descending inhibitory modulation, while spinal pruriceptive transmission is under an opposing, tonic descending facilitatory modulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8204798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82047982021-06-15 Opposing effects of cervical spinal cold block on spinal itch and pain transmission Carstens, Earl Carstens, Mirela Iodi Akiyama, Tasuku Davoodi, Auva Nagamine, Masaki Itch (Phila) Article Inactivation of descending pathways enhanced responses of spinal dorsal horn neurons to noxious stimuli, but little is known regarding tonic descending modulation of spinal itch transmission. To study effects of cervical spinal cold block on responses of dorsal horn neurons to itch-evoking and pain-evoking stimuli, single-unit recordings were made from superficial dorsal horn wide dynamic range and nociceptive-specific-type neurons in pentobarbital-anesthetized mice. Intradermal histamine excited 17 units. Cold block starting 1 minute after intradermal injection of histamine caused a marked decrease in firing. The histamine-evoked response during and following cold block was significantly lower compared with control histamine-evoked responses in the absence of cold block. A similar but weaker depressant effect of cold block was observed for dorsal horn unit responses to chloroquine. Twenty-six units responded to mustard oil allyl isothiocyanate (AITC), with a further significant increase in firing during the 1-minute period of cold block beginning 1 minute after AITC application. Activity during cold block was significantly greater compared with the same time period of control responses to AITC in the absence of cold block. Ten units’ responses to noxious heat were significantly enhanced during cold block, while 6 units’ responses were reduced and 18 unaffected. Cold block had no effect on mechanically evoked responses. These results indicate that spinal chemonociceptive transmission is under tonic descending inhibitory modulation, while spinal pruriceptive transmission is under an opposing, tonic descending facilitatory modulation. 2018-08-15 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8204798/ /pubmed/34136640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/itx.0000000000000016 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Carstens, Earl
Carstens, Mirela Iodi
Akiyama, Tasuku
Davoodi, Auva
Nagamine, Masaki
Opposing effects of cervical spinal cold block on spinal itch and pain transmission
title Opposing effects of cervical spinal cold block on spinal itch and pain transmission
title_full Opposing effects of cervical spinal cold block on spinal itch and pain transmission
title_fullStr Opposing effects of cervical spinal cold block on spinal itch and pain transmission
title_full_unstemmed Opposing effects of cervical spinal cold block on spinal itch and pain transmission
title_short Opposing effects of cervical spinal cold block on spinal itch and pain transmission
title_sort opposing effects of cervical spinal cold block on spinal itch and pain transmission
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8204798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/itx.0000000000000016
work_keys_str_mv AT carstensearl opposingeffectsofcervicalspinalcoldblockonspinalitchandpaintransmission
AT carstensmirelaiodi opposingeffectsofcervicalspinalcoldblockonspinalitchandpaintransmission
AT akiyamatasuku opposingeffectsofcervicalspinalcoldblockonspinalitchandpaintransmission
AT davoodiauva opposingeffectsofcervicalspinalcoldblockonspinalitchandpaintransmission
AT nagaminemasaki opposingeffectsofcervicalspinalcoldblockonspinalitchandpaintransmission