Cargando…
Transparency in risk-disproportionate regulation of modern crop-breeding techniques
Despite over 25 years of safe deployment of genetically engineered crops, the number, complexity, and scope of regulatory studies required for global approvals continue to increase devoid of adequate scientific justification. Recently, there have been calls to further expand the scope of study and d...
Autores principales: | Herman, Rod A., Storer, Nicholas P., Anderson, Jennifer A., Amijee, Firoz, Cnudde, Filip, Raybould, Alan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8204963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34107854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2021.1934353 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Expert opinion vs. empirical evidence: The precautionary principle applied to GM crops
por: Herman, Rod A, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Obligatory metabolomic profiling of gene‐edited crops is risk disproportionate
por: Fedorova, Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Digestion Assays in Allergenicity Assessment of Transgenic Proteins
por: Herman, Rod A., et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Weeds, as ancillary hosts, pose disproportionate risk for virulent pathogen transfer to crops
por: Linde, Celeste C., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Policy-Led Comparative Environmental Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Crops: Testing for Increased Risk Rather Than Profiling Phenotypes Leads to Predictable and Transparent Decision-Making
por: Raybould, Alan, et al.
Publicado: (2018)