Cargando…

A comparative evaluation of penetration depth and surface microhardness of Resin Infiltrant, CPP-ACPF and Novamin on enamel demineralization after banding: an in vitro study

BACKGROUND: The field of dentistry has been revolutionized by various concepts. Minimal invasive dentistry is the preferred treatment approach in the present era; therefore, various techniques have been advocated to arrest caries lesions at an early stage on the grounds of better understanding of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rana, Nishita, Singh, Namita, Shaila, Thomas, Abi. M., Jairath, Rajan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8204967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34179820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2021.1919119
_version_ 1783708417064435712
author Rana, Nishita
Singh, Namita
Shaila,
Thomas, Abi. M.
Jairath, Rajan
author_facet Rana, Nishita
Singh, Namita
Shaila,
Thomas, Abi. M.
Jairath, Rajan
author_sort Rana, Nishita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The field of dentistry has been revolutionized by various concepts. Minimal invasive dentistry is the preferred treatment approach in the present era; therefore, various techniques have been advocated to arrest caries lesions at an early stage on the grounds of better understanding of the dynamic nature of dental caries. Thus, study was conducted to compare and evaluate the penetration depth and enamel microhardness of Resin Infiltrant, CPP-ACPF and Novamin on artificial demineralized enamel surface after orthodontic banding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty extracted sound premolars were banded. The bands were cemented with type 1 GIC and further divided into – Group I: Resin Infiltrant, Group II: CCP-ACPF, Group III: Novamin and Group IV: Control. The samples were incubated for 30 days and then thermocycled. A window of 4 mm × 4 mm was prepared on the buccal surface of samples and artificially demineralized for 4 weeks. A single application was made for Resin Infiltrant, while Novamin and CCP-ACPF were applied twice daily. These samples were otherwise immersed in artificial saliva, and this was protocol was observed for 14 days. For the evaluation of penetration depth, 10 samples from each group were bucco-lingually sectioned and immersed in methylene blue dye solution for 24 h and then evaluated under stereomicroscope. For the enamel surface microhardness, remaining 10 samples from each group were embedded in acrylic resin with outer buccal surface exposed and were tested by a using digital Micro-Vickers hardness tester. RESULTS: All groups showed a significant difference in the depth of dye penetration and surface microhardness compared to the control group. As compared to the other tested groups, Resin Infiltrant exhibited the highest significant reduction in demineralization and increased microhardness. Novamin had a deeper penetration and increase in microhardness as compared to CCP-ACPF. CONCLUSION: Resin Infiltrant exhibited the highest potential to impede caries and constitutes a competent aerosol free micro-invasive strategy for combating non cavitated lesions approaching the outer layer dentine which are too advanced for remineralizing agents but do not necessarily require any drilling of tooth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8204967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82049672021-06-24 A comparative evaluation of penetration depth and surface microhardness of Resin Infiltrant, CPP-ACPF and Novamin on enamel demineralization after banding: an in vitro study Rana, Nishita Singh, Namita Shaila, Thomas, Abi. M. Jairath, Rajan Biomater Investig Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: The field of dentistry has been revolutionized by various concepts. Minimal invasive dentistry is the preferred treatment approach in the present era; therefore, various techniques have been advocated to arrest caries lesions at an early stage on the grounds of better understanding of the dynamic nature of dental caries. Thus, study was conducted to compare and evaluate the penetration depth and enamel microhardness of Resin Infiltrant, CPP-ACPF and Novamin on artificial demineralized enamel surface after orthodontic banding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty extracted sound premolars were banded. The bands were cemented with type 1 GIC and further divided into – Group I: Resin Infiltrant, Group II: CCP-ACPF, Group III: Novamin and Group IV: Control. The samples were incubated for 30 days and then thermocycled. A window of 4 mm × 4 mm was prepared on the buccal surface of samples and artificially demineralized for 4 weeks. A single application was made for Resin Infiltrant, while Novamin and CCP-ACPF were applied twice daily. These samples were otherwise immersed in artificial saliva, and this was protocol was observed for 14 days. For the evaluation of penetration depth, 10 samples from each group were bucco-lingually sectioned and immersed in methylene blue dye solution for 24 h and then evaluated under stereomicroscope. For the enamel surface microhardness, remaining 10 samples from each group were embedded in acrylic resin with outer buccal surface exposed and were tested by a using digital Micro-Vickers hardness tester. RESULTS: All groups showed a significant difference in the depth of dye penetration and surface microhardness compared to the control group. As compared to the other tested groups, Resin Infiltrant exhibited the highest significant reduction in demineralization and increased microhardness. Novamin had a deeper penetration and increase in microhardness as compared to CCP-ACPF. CONCLUSION: Resin Infiltrant exhibited the highest potential to impede caries and constitutes a competent aerosol free micro-invasive strategy for combating non cavitated lesions approaching the outer layer dentine which are too advanced for remineralizing agents but do not necessarily require any drilling of tooth. Taylor & Francis 2021-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8204967/ /pubmed/34179820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2021.1919119 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rana, Nishita
Singh, Namita
Shaila,
Thomas, Abi. M.
Jairath, Rajan
A comparative evaluation of penetration depth and surface microhardness of Resin Infiltrant, CPP-ACPF and Novamin on enamel demineralization after banding: an in vitro study
title A comparative evaluation of penetration depth and surface microhardness of Resin Infiltrant, CPP-ACPF and Novamin on enamel demineralization after banding: an in vitro study
title_full A comparative evaluation of penetration depth and surface microhardness of Resin Infiltrant, CPP-ACPF and Novamin on enamel demineralization after banding: an in vitro study
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of penetration depth and surface microhardness of Resin Infiltrant, CPP-ACPF and Novamin on enamel demineralization after banding: an in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of penetration depth and surface microhardness of Resin Infiltrant, CPP-ACPF and Novamin on enamel demineralization after banding: an in vitro study
title_short A comparative evaluation of penetration depth and surface microhardness of Resin Infiltrant, CPP-ACPF and Novamin on enamel demineralization after banding: an in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of penetration depth and surface microhardness of resin infiltrant, cpp-acpf and novamin on enamel demineralization after banding: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8204967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34179820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2021.1919119
work_keys_str_mv AT rananishita acomparativeevaluationofpenetrationdepthandsurfacemicrohardnessofresininfiltrantcppacpfandnovaminonenameldemineralizationafterbandinganinvitrostudy
AT singhnamita acomparativeevaluationofpenetrationdepthandsurfacemicrohardnessofresininfiltrantcppacpfandnovaminonenameldemineralizationafterbandinganinvitrostudy
AT shaila acomparativeevaluationofpenetrationdepthandsurfacemicrohardnessofresininfiltrantcppacpfandnovaminonenameldemineralizationafterbandinganinvitrostudy
AT thomasabim acomparativeevaluationofpenetrationdepthandsurfacemicrohardnessofresininfiltrantcppacpfandnovaminonenameldemineralizationafterbandinganinvitrostudy
AT jairathrajan acomparativeevaluationofpenetrationdepthandsurfacemicrohardnessofresininfiltrantcppacpfandnovaminonenameldemineralizationafterbandinganinvitrostudy
AT rananishita comparativeevaluationofpenetrationdepthandsurfacemicrohardnessofresininfiltrantcppacpfandnovaminonenameldemineralizationafterbandinganinvitrostudy
AT singhnamita comparativeevaluationofpenetrationdepthandsurfacemicrohardnessofresininfiltrantcppacpfandnovaminonenameldemineralizationafterbandinganinvitrostudy
AT shaila comparativeevaluationofpenetrationdepthandsurfacemicrohardnessofresininfiltrantcppacpfandnovaminonenameldemineralizationafterbandinganinvitrostudy
AT thomasabim comparativeevaluationofpenetrationdepthandsurfacemicrohardnessofresininfiltrantcppacpfandnovaminonenameldemineralizationafterbandinganinvitrostudy
AT jairathrajan comparativeevaluationofpenetrationdepthandsurfacemicrohardnessofresininfiltrantcppacpfandnovaminonenameldemineralizationafterbandinganinvitrostudy