Cargando…

Do assessments of cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness influence subsequent reported physical activity? A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Regular physical activity and exercise provide many health benefits. These health benefits are mediated in large part through cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular strength. As most individuals have not had an assessment of their personal cardiorespiratory fitness or muscular strength w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langland, James T., Sathnur, Neeraj, Wang, Qi, Olson, Andrew P. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8205209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34130756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-021-00295-z
_version_ 1783708465194074112
author Langland, James T.
Sathnur, Neeraj
Wang, Qi
Olson, Andrew P. J.
author_facet Langland, James T.
Sathnur, Neeraj
Wang, Qi
Olson, Andrew P. J.
author_sort Langland, James T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Regular physical activity and exercise provide many health benefits. These health benefits are mediated in large part through cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular strength. As most individuals have not had an assessment of their personal cardiorespiratory fitness or muscular strength we investigated if measurements of cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular strength would influence an individual’s subsequent self-reported exercise and physical activity. METHODS: Volunteer subjects at a State Fair were randomized in 1:1 parallel fashion to control and intervention groups. The baseline Exercise Vital Sign (EVS) and type of physical activity were obtained from all subjects. The intervention group received estimated maximum oxygen uptake (VO(2)max) using a step test and muscular strength using a hand grip dynamometer along with age-specific norms for both measurements. All subjects were provided exercise recommendations. Follow up surveys were conducted at 3, 6 and 12 months regarding their EVS and physical activity. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred fifteen individuals (656 intervention, 659 control) were randomized with 1 year follow up data obtained from 823 subjects (62.5%). Baseline mean EVS was 213 min/week. No change in EVS was found in either group at follow-up (p = 0.99). Subjects who were less active at baseline (EVS < 150) did show an increase in EVS (86 to 146) at 6 months (p < 0.05). At 3 months the intervention group increased resistance training (29.1 to 42.8%) compared to controls (26.3 to 31.4%) (p < 0.05). Lifestyle physical activity increased in the intervention group at 3 months (27.7 to 29.1%) and 6 months (25%) whereas it declined in the control group at 3 months (24.4 to 20.1%) and 6 months (18.7%) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Providing VO(2)max estimates and grip strength did not produce an increase in overall physical activity. The EVS and exercise recommendations did however produce an increase in physical activity in less active individuals. In a very active population the VO(2)max estimate and measured grip strength did increase lifestyle activity and resistance training. Wider adoption of these measures could be effective in promoting physical activity and resistance training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03518931 Registered 05/08/2018 -retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8205209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82052092021-06-16 Do assessments of cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness influence subsequent reported physical activity? A randomized controlled trial Langland, James T. Sathnur, Neeraj Wang, Qi Olson, Andrew P. J. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research Article BACKGROUND: Regular physical activity and exercise provide many health benefits. These health benefits are mediated in large part through cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular strength. As most individuals have not had an assessment of their personal cardiorespiratory fitness or muscular strength we investigated if measurements of cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular strength would influence an individual’s subsequent self-reported exercise and physical activity. METHODS: Volunteer subjects at a State Fair were randomized in 1:1 parallel fashion to control and intervention groups. The baseline Exercise Vital Sign (EVS) and type of physical activity were obtained from all subjects. The intervention group received estimated maximum oxygen uptake (VO(2)max) using a step test and muscular strength using a hand grip dynamometer along with age-specific norms for both measurements. All subjects were provided exercise recommendations. Follow up surveys were conducted at 3, 6 and 12 months regarding their EVS and physical activity. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred fifteen individuals (656 intervention, 659 control) were randomized with 1 year follow up data obtained from 823 subjects (62.5%). Baseline mean EVS was 213 min/week. No change in EVS was found in either group at follow-up (p = 0.99). Subjects who were less active at baseline (EVS < 150) did show an increase in EVS (86 to 146) at 6 months (p < 0.05). At 3 months the intervention group increased resistance training (29.1 to 42.8%) compared to controls (26.3 to 31.4%) (p < 0.05). Lifestyle physical activity increased in the intervention group at 3 months (27.7 to 29.1%) and 6 months (25%) whereas it declined in the control group at 3 months (24.4 to 20.1%) and 6 months (18.7%) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Providing VO(2)max estimates and grip strength did not produce an increase in overall physical activity. The EVS and exercise recommendations did however produce an increase in physical activity in less active individuals. In a very active population the VO(2)max estimate and measured grip strength did increase lifestyle activity and resistance training. Wider adoption of these measures could be effective in promoting physical activity and resistance training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03518931 Registered 05/08/2018 -retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8205209/ /pubmed/34130756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-021-00295-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Langland, James T.
Sathnur, Neeraj
Wang, Qi
Olson, Andrew P. J.
Do assessments of cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness influence subsequent reported physical activity? A randomized controlled trial
title Do assessments of cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness influence subsequent reported physical activity? A randomized controlled trial
title_full Do assessments of cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness influence subsequent reported physical activity? A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Do assessments of cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness influence subsequent reported physical activity? A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Do assessments of cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness influence subsequent reported physical activity? A randomized controlled trial
title_short Do assessments of cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness influence subsequent reported physical activity? A randomized controlled trial
title_sort do assessments of cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness influence subsequent reported physical activity? a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8205209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34130756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-021-00295-z
work_keys_str_mv AT langlandjamest doassessmentsofcardiorespiratoryandmuscularfitnessinfluencesubsequentreportedphysicalactivityarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sathnurneeraj doassessmentsofcardiorespiratoryandmuscularfitnessinfluencesubsequentreportedphysicalactivityarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangqi doassessmentsofcardiorespiratoryandmuscularfitnessinfluencesubsequentreportedphysicalactivityarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT olsonandrewpj doassessmentsofcardiorespiratoryandmuscularfitnessinfluencesubsequentreportedphysicalactivityarandomizedcontrolledtrial