Cargando…

The Correlation of Communication Effectiveness and Patient Satisfaction

This study assessed the correlation of 9 questions addressing communication effectiveness (the Communication Effectiveness Questionnaire [CEQ]) with other patient-reported experience measures (PREMs; satisfaction, perceived empathy) as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; pain intensity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Versluijs, Yvonne, Lemmers, Maartje, Brown, Laura E., Gonzalez, Amanda I., Kortlever, Joost T. P., Ring, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8205353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34179403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373521998839
_version_ 1783708493135478784
author Versluijs, Yvonne
Lemmers, Maartje
Brown, Laura E.
Gonzalez, Amanda I.
Kortlever, Joost T. P.
Ring, David
author_facet Versluijs, Yvonne
Lemmers, Maartje
Brown, Laura E.
Gonzalez, Amanda I.
Kortlever, Joost T. P.
Ring, David
author_sort Versluijs, Yvonne
collection PubMed
description This study assessed the correlation of 9 questions addressing communication effectiveness (the Communication Effectiveness Questionnaire [CEQ]) with other patient-reported experience measures (PREMs; satisfaction, perceived empathy) as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; pain intensity, activity tolerance) in patients with musculoskeletal illness or injury. In a cross-sectional study, 210 patients visiting an orthopedic surgeon completed the CEQ and measures of satisfaction with the visit, perceived empathy, pain intensity, and activity tolerance. We evaluated correlations between CEQ and other PREMs and CEQ and PROMs. We measured ceiling effects of the PREMs. Communication effectiveness correlated moderately with other PREMs such as satisfaction (ρ = 0.54; P < .001) and perceived empathy (ρ = 0.54; P < .001). Communication effectiveness did not correlate with PROMs: pain intensity (ρ = −0.01; P = .93) and activity tolerance (ρ = −0.05; P = .44). All of the experience measures have high ceiling effects: perceived empathy 37%, satisfaction 80%, and CEQ 46%. The observation of notable correlations of various PREMs, combined with their high ceiling effects, direct us to identify a likely common statistical construct (which we hypothesize as “relationship”) accounting for variation in PREMs, and then develop a PREM which measures that construct in a manner that results in a Gaussian distribution of scores. At least within the limitations of current experience measures, there seems to be no association between illness (PROMs) and experience (PREMs).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8205353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82053532021-06-25 The Correlation of Communication Effectiveness and Patient Satisfaction Versluijs, Yvonne Lemmers, Maartje Brown, Laura E. Gonzalez, Amanda I. Kortlever, Joost T. P. Ring, David J Patient Exp Research Article This study assessed the correlation of 9 questions addressing communication effectiveness (the Communication Effectiveness Questionnaire [CEQ]) with other patient-reported experience measures (PREMs; satisfaction, perceived empathy) as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; pain intensity, activity tolerance) in patients with musculoskeletal illness or injury. In a cross-sectional study, 210 patients visiting an orthopedic surgeon completed the CEQ and measures of satisfaction with the visit, perceived empathy, pain intensity, and activity tolerance. We evaluated correlations between CEQ and other PREMs and CEQ and PROMs. We measured ceiling effects of the PREMs. Communication effectiveness correlated moderately with other PREMs such as satisfaction (ρ = 0.54; P < .001) and perceived empathy (ρ = 0.54; P < .001). Communication effectiveness did not correlate with PROMs: pain intensity (ρ = −0.01; P = .93) and activity tolerance (ρ = −0.05; P = .44). All of the experience measures have high ceiling effects: perceived empathy 37%, satisfaction 80%, and CEQ 46%. The observation of notable correlations of various PREMs, combined with their high ceiling effects, direct us to identify a likely common statistical construct (which we hypothesize as “relationship”) accounting for variation in PREMs, and then develop a PREM which measures that construct in a manner that results in a Gaussian distribution of scores. At least within the limitations of current experience measures, there seems to be no association between illness (PROMs) and experience (PREMs). SAGE Publications 2021-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8205353/ /pubmed/34179403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373521998839 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Article
Versluijs, Yvonne
Lemmers, Maartje
Brown, Laura E.
Gonzalez, Amanda I.
Kortlever, Joost T. P.
Ring, David
The Correlation of Communication Effectiveness and Patient Satisfaction
title The Correlation of Communication Effectiveness and Patient Satisfaction
title_full The Correlation of Communication Effectiveness and Patient Satisfaction
title_fullStr The Correlation of Communication Effectiveness and Patient Satisfaction
title_full_unstemmed The Correlation of Communication Effectiveness and Patient Satisfaction
title_short The Correlation of Communication Effectiveness and Patient Satisfaction
title_sort correlation of communication effectiveness and patient satisfaction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8205353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34179403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373521998839
work_keys_str_mv AT versluijsyvonne thecorrelationofcommunicationeffectivenessandpatientsatisfaction
AT lemmersmaartje thecorrelationofcommunicationeffectivenessandpatientsatisfaction
AT brownlaurae thecorrelationofcommunicationeffectivenessandpatientsatisfaction
AT gonzalezamandai thecorrelationofcommunicationeffectivenessandpatientsatisfaction
AT kortleverjoosttp thecorrelationofcommunicationeffectivenessandpatientsatisfaction
AT ringdavid thecorrelationofcommunicationeffectivenessandpatientsatisfaction
AT versluijsyvonne correlationofcommunicationeffectivenessandpatientsatisfaction
AT lemmersmaartje correlationofcommunicationeffectivenessandpatientsatisfaction
AT brownlaurae correlationofcommunicationeffectivenessandpatientsatisfaction
AT gonzalezamandai correlationofcommunicationeffectivenessandpatientsatisfaction
AT kortleverjoosttp correlationofcommunicationeffectivenessandpatientsatisfaction
AT ringdavid correlationofcommunicationeffectivenessandpatientsatisfaction