Cargando…

Screening of women with aesthetic prostheses in dedicated sessions of a population-based breast cancer screening programme

BACKGROUND: Women with aesthetic prostheses must be included in the target population of mammography screening programmes. Breast implants are radiopaque and partially obscure the breast tissue. This can be avoided with the use of the Eklund technique, which causes an increased radiation exposure. I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deandrea, Silvia, Cavazzana, Laura, Principi, Niccolò, Luconi, Ester, Campoleoni, Mauro, Bastiampillai, Anan Judina, Bracchi, Lucia, Bucchi, Lauro, Pedilarco, Stella, Piscitelli, Antonio, Sfondrini, Maria Silvia, Silvestri, Anna Rita, Castaldi, Silvana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8206050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33954896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01357-5
_version_ 1783708563598737408
author Deandrea, Silvia
Cavazzana, Laura
Principi, Niccolò
Luconi, Ester
Campoleoni, Mauro
Bastiampillai, Anan Judina
Bracchi, Lucia
Bucchi, Lauro
Pedilarco, Stella
Piscitelli, Antonio
Sfondrini, Maria Silvia
Silvestri, Anna Rita
Castaldi, Silvana
author_facet Deandrea, Silvia
Cavazzana, Laura
Principi, Niccolò
Luconi, Ester
Campoleoni, Mauro
Bastiampillai, Anan Judina
Bracchi, Lucia
Bucchi, Lauro
Pedilarco, Stella
Piscitelli, Antonio
Sfondrini, Maria Silvia
Silvestri, Anna Rita
Castaldi, Silvana
author_sort Deandrea, Silvia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women with aesthetic prostheses must be included in the target population of mammography screening programmes. Breast implants are radiopaque and partially obscure the breast tissue. This can be avoided with the use of the Eklund technique, which causes an increased radiation exposure. In this study, augmented women undergoing a dedicated protocol within a population-based screening programme were compared according to selected indicators with the standard screening population. Essential dosimetric parameters and their time trend were also assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in a screening centre in Milan in the years 2009–2016. The screening protocol for women with breast implants included a double-read mammography with the Eklund views, ultrasound and clinical breast examination. RESULTS: A total of 28,794 women were enrolled, including 588 (2%) women with breast implants and 28,206 (98%) undergoing the standard screening protocol. The invasive assessment rate was 9.0‰ for women with breast implants vs. 15‰ in the standard cohort. The surgical referral rate was 2.2% vs. 0.9%. The detection rate was similar in the two groups (4.0 and 4.5‰, respectively). There were significant differences in the average glandular dose according to the mammography equipment. The use of the Eklund views increased over time. CONCLUSIONS: Screening of augmented women according to a specific protocol in the contexts of population-based programmes is feasible. Observed differences in screening indicators relative to the standard screening population require further research. The increasing use of Eklund views probably results from quality assurance measures associated with screening programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8206050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82060502021-07-01 Screening of women with aesthetic prostheses in dedicated sessions of a population-based breast cancer screening programme Deandrea, Silvia Cavazzana, Laura Principi, Niccolò Luconi, Ester Campoleoni, Mauro Bastiampillai, Anan Judina Bracchi, Lucia Bucchi, Lauro Pedilarco, Stella Piscitelli, Antonio Sfondrini, Maria Silvia Silvestri, Anna Rita Castaldi, Silvana Radiol Med Breast Radiology BACKGROUND: Women with aesthetic prostheses must be included in the target population of mammography screening programmes. Breast implants are radiopaque and partially obscure the breast tissue. This can be avoided with the use of the Eklund technique, which causes an increased radiation exposure. In this study, augmented women undergoing a dedicated protocol within a population-based screening programme were compared according to selected indicators with the standard screening population. Essential dosimetric parameters and their time trend were also assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in a screening centre in Milan in the years 2009–2016. The screening protocol for women with breast implants included a double-read mammography with the Eklund views, ultrasound and clinical breast examination. RESULTS: A total of 28,794 women were enrolled, including 588 (2%) women with breast implants and 28,206 (98%) undergoing the standard screening protocol. The invasive assessment rate was 9.0‰ for women with breast implants vs. 15‰ in the standard cohort. The surgical referral rate was 2.2% vs. 0.9%. The detection rate was similar in the two groups (4.0 and 4.5‰, respectively). There were significant differences in the average glandular dose according to the mammography equipment. The use of the Eklund views increased over time. CONCLUSIONS: Screening of augmented women according to a specific protocol in the contexts of population-based programmes is feasible. Observed differences in screening indicators relative to the standard screening population require further research. The increasing use of Eklund views probably results from quality assurance measures associated with screening programmes. Springer Milan 2021-05-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8206050/ /pubmed/33954896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01357-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Breast Radiology
Deandrea, Silvia
Cavazzana, Laura
Principi, Niccolò
Luconi, Ester
Campoleoni, Mauro
Bastiampillai, Anan Judina
Bracchi, Lucia
Bucchi, Lauro
Pedilarco, Stella
Piscitelli, Antonio
Sfondrini, Maria Silvia
Silvestri, Anna Rita
Castaldi, Silvana
Screening of women with aesthetic prostheses in dedicated sessions of a population-based breast cancer screening programme
title Screening of women with aesthetic prostheses in dedicated sessions of a population-based breast cancer screening programme
title_full Screening of women with aesthetic prostheses in dedicated sessions of a population-based breast cancer screening programme
title_fullStr Screening of women with aesthetic prostheses in dedicated sessions of a population-based breast cancer screening programme
title_full_unstemmed Screening of women with aesthetic prostheses in dedicated sessions of a population-based breast cancer screening programme
title_short Screening of women with aesthetic prostheses in dedicated sessions of a population-based breast cancer screening programme
title_sort screening of women with aesthetic prostheses in dedicated sessions of a population-based breast cancer screening programme
topic Breast Radiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8206050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33954896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01357-5
work_keys_str_mv AT deandreasilvia screeningofwomenwithaestheticprosthesesindedicatedsessionsofapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT cavazzanalaura screeningofwomenwithaestheticprosthesesindedicatedsessionsofapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT principiniccolo screeningofwomenwithaestheticprosthesesindedicatedsessionsofapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT luconiester screeningofwomenwithaestheticprosthesesindedicatedsessionsofapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT campoleonimauro screeningofwomenwithaestheticprosthesesindedicatedsessionsofapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT bastiampillaiananjudina screeningofwomenwithaestheticprosthesesindedicatedsessionsofapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT bracchilucia screeningofwomenwithaestheticprosthesesindedicatedsessionsofapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT bucchilauro screeningofwomenwithaestheticprosthesesindedicatedsessionsofapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT pedilarcostella screeningofwomenwithaestheticprosthesesindedicatedsessionsofapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT piscitelliantonio screeningofwomenwithaestheticprosthesesindedicatedsessionsofapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT sfondrinimariasilvia screeningofwomenwithaestheticprosthesesindedicatedsessionsofapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT silvestriannarita screeningofwomenwithaestheticprosthesesindedicatedsessionsofapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT castaldisilvana screeningofwomenwithaestheticprosthesesindedicatedsessionsofapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme