Cargando…
A thematic analysis to examine the feasibility of EHR-based clinical decision support for implementing Choosing Wisely(®) guidelines
OBJECTIVE: To identify important barriers and facilitators relating to the feasibility of implementing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) as clinical decision support (CDS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a qualitative, thematic analysis of interviews from seven interviews with dyads (one clin...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8206400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34142016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab031 |
_version_ | 1783708625076748288 |
---|---|
author | Douthit, Brian J Staes, Catherine J Del Fiol, Guilherme Richesson, Rachel L |
author_facet | Douthit, Brian J Staes, Catherine J Del Fiol, Guilherme Richesson, Rachel L |
author_sort | Douthit, Brian J |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To identify important barriers and facilitators relating to the feasibility of implementing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) as clinical decision support (CDS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a qualitative, thematic analysis of interviews from seven interviews with dyads (one clinical expert and one systems analyst) who discussed the feasibility of implementing 10 Choosing Wisely(®) guidelines at their institutions. We conducted a content analysis to extract salient themes describing facilitators, challenges, and other feasibility considerations regarding implementing CPGs as CDS. RESULTS: We identified five themes: concern about data quality impacts implementation planning; the availability of data in a computable format is a primary factor for implementation feasibility; customized strategies are needed to mitigate uncertainty and ambiguity when translating CPGs to an electronic health record-based tool; misalignment of expected CDS with pre-existing clinical workflows impact implementation; and individual level factors of end-users must be considered when selecting and implementing CDS tools. DISCUSSION: The themes reveal several considerations for CPG as CDS implementations regarding data quality, knowledge representation, and sociotechnical issues. Guideline authors should be aware that using CDS to implement CPGs is becoming increasingly popular and should consider providing clear guidelines to aid implementation. The complex nature of CPG as CDS implementation necessitates a unified effort to overcome these challenges. CONCLUSION: Our analysis highlights the importance of cooperation and co-development of standards, strategies, and infrastructure to address the difficulties of implementing CPGs as CDS. The complex interactions between the concepts revealed in the interviews necessitates the need that such work should not be conducted in silos. We also implore that implementers disseminate their experiences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8206400 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82064002021-06-16 A thematic analysis to examine the feasibility of EHR-based clinical decision support for implementing Choosing Wisely(®) guidelines Douthit, Brian J Staes, Catherine J Del Fiol, Guilherme Richesson, Rachel L JAMIA Open Research and Applications OBJECTIVE: To identify important barriers and facilitators relating to the feasibility of implementing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) as clinical decision support (CDS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a qualitative, thematic analysis of interviews from seven interviews with dyads (one clinical expert and one systems analyst) who discussed the feasibility of implementing 10 Choosing Wisely(®) guidelines at their institutions. We conducted a content analysis to extract salient themes describing facilitators, challenges, and other feasibility considerations regarding implementing CPGs as CDS. RESULTS: We identified five themes: concern about data quality impacts implementation planning; the availability of data in a computable format is a primary factor for implementation feasibility; customized strategies are needed to mitigate uncertainty and ambiguity when translating CPGs to an electronic health record-based tool; misalignment of expected CDS with pre-existing clinical workflows impact implementation; and individual level factors of end-users must be considered when selecting and implementing CDS tools. DISCUSSION: The themes reveal several considerations for CPG as CDS implementations regarding data quality, knowledge representation, and sociotechnical issues. Guideline authors should be aware that using CDS to implement CPGs is becoming increasingly popular and should consider providing clear guidelines to aid implementation. The complex nature of CPG as CDS implementation necessitates a unified effort to overcome these challenges. CONCLUSION: Our analysis highlights the importance of cooperation and co-development of standards, strategies, and infrastructure to address the difficulties of implementing CPGs as CDS. The complex interactions between the concepts revealed in the interviews necessitates the need that such work should not be conducted in silos. We also implore that implementers disseminate their experiences. Oxford University Press 2021-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8206400/ /pubmed/34142016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab031 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Research and Applications Douthit, Brian J Staes, Catherine J Del Fiol, Guilherme Richesson, Rachel L A thematic analysis to examine the feasibility of EHR-based clinical decision support for implementing Choosing Wisely(®) guidelines |
title | A thematic analysis to examine the feasibility of EHR-based clinical decision support for implementing Choosing Wisely(®) guidelines |
title_full | A thematic analysis to examine the feasibility of EHR-based clinical decision support for implementing Choosing Wisely(®) guidelines |
title_fullStr | A thematic analysis to examine the feasibility of EHR-based clinical decision support for implementing Choosing Wisely(®) guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | A thematic analysis to examine the feasibility of EHR-based clinical decision support for implementing Choosing Wisely(®) guidelines |
title_short | A thematic analysis to examine the feasibility of EHR-based clinical decision support for implementing Choosing Wisely(®) guidelines |
title_sort | thematic analysis to examine the feasibility of ehr-based clinical decision support for implementing choosing wisely(®) guidelines |
topic | Research and Applications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8206400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34142016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT douthitbrianj athematicanalysistoexaminethefeasibilityofehrbasedclinicaldecisionsupportforimplementingchoosingwiselyguidelines AT staescatherinej athematicanalysistoexaminethefeasibilityofehrbasedclinicaldecisionsupportforimplementingchoosingwiselyguidelines AT delfiolguilherme athematicanalysistoexaminethefeasibilityofehrbasedclinicaldecisionsupportforimplementingchoosingwiselyguidelines AT richessonrachell athematicanalysistoexaminethefeasibilityofehrbasedclinicaldecisionsupportforimplementingchoosingwiselyguidelines AT douthitbrianj thematicanalysistoexaminethefeasibilityofehrbasedclinicaldecisionsupportforimplementingchoosingwiselyguidelines AT staescatherinej thematicanalysistoexaminethefeasibilityofehrbasedclinicaldecisionsupportforimplementingchoosingwiselyguidelines AT delfiolguilherme thematicanalysistoexaminethefeasibilityofehrbasedclinicaldecisionsupportforimplementingchoosingwiselyguidelines AT richessonrachell thematicanalysistoexaminethefeasibilityofehrbasedclinicaldecisionsupportforimplementingchoosingwiselyguidelines |