Cargando…

Psychobiotic interventions for anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with youth consultation

The human gut microbiome influence on brain function and mental health is an emerging area of intensive research. Animal and human research indicates adolescence as a sensitive period when the gut-brain axis is fine-tuned, where dietary interventions to change the microbiome may have long-lasting co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cohen Kadosh, Kathrin, Basso, Melissa, Knytl, Paul, Johnstone, Nicola, Lau, Jennifer Y. F., Gibson, Glenn R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8206413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34131108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01422-7
_version_ 1783708626546851840
author Cohen Kadosh, Kathrin
Basso, Melissa
Knytl, Paul
Johnstone, Nicola
Lau, Jennifer Y. F.
Gibson, Glenn R.
author_facet Cohen Kadosh, Kathrin
Basso, Melissa
Knytl, Paul
Johnstone, Nicola
Lau, Jennifer Y. F.
Gibson, Glenn R.
author_sort Cohen Kadosh, Kathrin
collection PubMed
description The human gut microbiome influence on brain function and mental health is an emerging area of intensive research. Animal and human research indicates adolescence as a sensitive period when the gut-brain axis is fine-tuned, where dietary interventions to change the microbiome may have long-lasting consequences for mental health. This study reports a systematic review and meta-analysis of microbiota-targeted (psychobiotics) interventions on anxiety in youth, with discussion of a consultation on the acceptability of psychobiotic interventions for mental health management amongst youth with lived experience. Six databases were searched for controlled trials in human samples (age range: 10–24 years) seeking to reduce anxiety. Post intervention outcomes were extracted as standard mean differences (SMDs) and pooled based on a random-effects model. 5416 studies were identified: 14 eligible for systematic review and 10 eligible for meta-analysis (total of 324 experimental and 293 control subjects). The meta-analysis found heterogeneity I(2) was 12% and the pooled SMD was −0.03 (95% CI: −0.21, 0.14), indicating an absence of effect. One study presented with low bias risk, 5 with high, and 4 with uncertain risk. Accounting for risk, sensitivities analysis revealed a SMD of −0.16 (95% CI: −0.38, 0.07), indicative of minimal efficacy of psychobiotics for anxiety treatment in humans. There is currently limited evidence for use of psychobiotics to treat anxiety in youth. However, future progress will require a multidisciplinary research approach, which gives priority to specifying mechanisms in the human models, providing causal understanding, and addressing the wider context, and would be welcomed by anxious youths.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8206413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82064132021-07-01 Psychobiotic interventions for anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with youth consultation Cohen Kadosh, Kathrin Basso, Melissa Knytl, Paul Johnstone, Nicola Lau, Jennifer Y. F. Gibson, Glenn R. Transl Psychiatry Article The human gut microbiome influence on brain function and mental health is an emerging area of intensive research. Animal and human research indicates adolescence as a sensitive period when the gut-brain axis is fine-tuned, where dietary interventions to change the microbiome may have long-lasting consequences for mental health. This study reports a systematic review and meta-analysis of microbiota-targeted (psychobiotics) interventions on anxiety in youth, with discussion of a consultation on the acceptability of psychobiotic interventions for mental health management amongst youth with lived experience. Six databases were searched for controlled trials in human samples (age range: 10–24 years) seeking to reduce anxiety. Post intervention outcomes were extracted as standard mean differences (SMDs) and pooled based on a random-effects model. 5416 studies were identified: 14 eligible for systematic review and 10 eligible for meta-analysis (total of 324 experimental and 293 control subjects). The meta-analysis found heterogeneity I(2) was 12% and the pooled SMD was −0.03 (95% CI: −0.21, 0.14), indicating an absence of effect. One study presented with low bias risk, 5 with high, and 4 with uncertain risk. Accounting for risk, sensitivities analysis revealed a SMD of −0.16 (95% CI: −0.38, 0.07), indicative of minimal efficacy of psychobiotics for anxiety treatment in humans. There is currently limited evidence for use of psychobiotics to treat anxiety in youth. However, future progress will require a multidisciplinary research approach, which gives priority to specifying mechanisms in the human models, providing causal understanding, and addressing the wider context, and would be welcomed by anxious youths. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8206413/ /pubmed/34131108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01422-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Cohen Kadosh, Kathrin
Basso, Melissa
Knytl, Paul
Johnstone, Nicola
Lau, Jennifer Y. F.
Gibson, Glenn R.
Psychobiotic interventions for anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with youth consultation
title Psychobiotic interventions for anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with youth consultation
title_full Psychobiotic interventions for anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with youth consultation
title_fullStr Psychobiotic interventions for anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with youth consultation
title_full_unstemmed Psychobiotic interventions for anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with youth consultation
title_short Psychobiotic interventions for anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with youth consultation
title_sort psychobiotic interventions for anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with youth consultation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8206413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34131108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01422-7
work_keys_str_mv AT cohenkadoshkathrin psychobioticinterventionsforanxietyinyoungpeopleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithyouthconsultation
AT bassomelissa psychobioticinterventionsforanxietyinyoungpeopleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithyouthconsultation
AT knytlpaul psychobioticinterventionsforanxietyinyoungpeopleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithyouthconsultation
AT johnstonenicola psychobioticinterventionsforanxietyinyoungpeopleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithyouthconsultation
AT laujenniferyf psychobioticinterventionsforanxietyinyoungpeopleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithyouthconsultation
AT gibsonglennr psychobioticinterventionsforanxietyinyoungpeopleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithyouthconsultation