Cargando…
Psychobiotic interventions for anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with youth consultation
The human gut microbiome influence on brain function and mental health is an emerging area of intensive research. Animal and human research indicates adolescence as a sensitive period when the gut-brain axis is fine-tuned, where dietary interventions to change the microbiome may have long-lasting co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8206413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34131108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01422-7 |
_version_ | 1783708626546851840 |
---|---|
author | Cohen Kadosh, Kathrin Basso, Melissa Knytl, Paul Johnstone, Nicola Lau, Jennifer Y. F. Gibson, Glenn R. |
author_facet | Cohen Kadosh, Kathrin Basso, Melissa Knytl, Paul Johnstone, Nicola Lau, Jennifer Y. F. Gibson, Glenn R. |
author_sort | Cohen Kadosh, Kathrin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The human gut microbiome influence on brain function and mental health is an emerging area of intensive research. Animal and human research indicates adolescence as a sensitive period when the gut-brain axis is fine-tuned, where dietary interventions to change the microbiome may have long-lasting consequences for mental health. This study reports a systematic review and meta-analysis of microbiota-targeted (psychobiotics) interventions on anxiety in youth, with discussion of a consultation on the acceptability of psychobiotic interventions for mental health management amongst youth with lived experience. Six databases were searched for controlled trials in human samples (age range: 10–24 years) seeking to reduce anxiety. Post intervention outcomes were extracted as standard mean differences (SMDs) and pooled based on a random-effects model. 5416 studies were identified: 14 eligible for systematic review and 10 eligible for meta-analysis (total of 324 experimental and 293 control subjects). The meta-analysis found heterogeneity I(2) was 12% and the pooled SMD was −0.03 (95% CI: −0.21, 0.14), indicating an absence of effect. One study presented with low bias risk, 5 with high, and 4 with uncertain risk. Accounting for risk, sensitivities analysis revealed a SMD of −0.16 (95% CI: −0.38, 0.07), indicative of minimal efficacy of psychobiotics for anxiety treatment in humans. There is currently limited evidence for use of psychobiotics to treat anxiety in youth. However, future progress will require a multidisciplinary research approach, which gives priority to specifying mechanisms in the human models, providing causal understanding, and addressing the wider context, and would be welcomed by anxious youths. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8206413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82064132021-07-01 Psychobiotic interventions for anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with youth consultation Cohen Kadosh, Kathrin Basso, Melissa Knytl, Paul Johnstone, Nicola Lau, Jennifer Y. F. Gibson, Glenn R. Transl Psychiatry Article The human gut microbiome influence on brain function and mental health is an emerging area of intensive research. Animal and human research indicates adolescence as a sensitive period when the gut-brain axis is fine-tuned, where dietary interventions to change the microbiome may have long-lasting consequences for mental health. This study reports a systematic review and meta-analysis of microbiota-targeted (psychobiotics) interventions on anxiety in youth, with discussion of a consultation on the acceptability of psychobiotic interventions for mental health management amongst youth with lived experience. Six databases were searched for controlled trials in human samples (age range: 10–24 years) seeking to reduce anxiety. Post intervention outcomes were extracted as standard mean differences (SMDs) and pooled based on a random-effects model. 5416 studies were identified: 14 eligible for systematic review and 10 eligible for meta-analysis (total of 324 experimental and 293 control subjects). The meta-analysis found heterogeneity I(2) was 12% and the pooled SMD was −0.03 (95% CI: −0.21, 0.14), indicating an absence of effect. One study presented with low bias risk, 5 with high, and 4 with uncertain risk. Accounting for risk, sensitivities analysis revealed a SMD of −0.16 (95% CI: −0.38, 0.07), indicative of minimal efficacy of psychobiotics for anxiety treatment in humans. There is currently limited evidence for use of psychobiotics to treat anxiety in youth. However, future progress will require a multidisciplinary research approach, which gives priority to specifying mechanisms in the human models, providing causal understanding, and addressing the wider context, and would be welcomed by anxious youths. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8206413/ /pubmed/34131108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01422-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Cohen Kadosh, Kathrin Basso, Melissa Knytl, Paul Johnstone, Nicola Lau, Jennifer Y. F. Gibson, Glenn R. Psychobiotic interventions for anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with youth consultation |
title | Psychobiotic interventions for anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with youth consultation |
title_full | Psychobiotic interventions for anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with youth consultation |
title_fullStr | Psychobiotic interventions for anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with youth consultation |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychobiotic interventions for anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with youth consultation |
title_short | Psychobiotic interventions for anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with youth consultation |
title_sort | psychobiotic interventions for anxiety in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with youth consultation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8206413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34131108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01422-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cohenkadoshkathrin psychobioticinterventionsforanxietyinyoungpeopleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithyouthconsultation AT bassomelissa psychobioticinterventionsforanxietyinyoungpeopleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithyouthconsultation AT knytlpaul psychobioticinterventionsforanxietyinyoungpeopleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithyouthconsultation AT johnstonenicola psychobioticinterventionsforanxietyinyoungpeopleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithyouthconsultation AT laujenniferyf psychobioticinterventionsforanxietyinyoungpeopleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithyouthconsultation AT gibsonglennr psychobioticinterventionsforanxietyinyoungpeopleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithyouthconsultation |