Cargando…

Comparison of Bacterial Microleakage of Endoseal MTA Sealer and Pro-Root MTA in Root Perforation

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Different materials have been used to repair root perforations, the most successful of which is mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). It is technically difficult to use MTA for perforation repair. Recently, some bio-ceramic sealers such as Endoseal MTA were introduced to repair...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dastorani, Mehdi, Shourvarzi, Behnam, Nojoumi, Farshad, Ajami, Majid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8206596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34150945
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.86042.1164
_version_ 1783708661874425856
author Dastorani, Mehdi
Shourvarzi, Behnam
Nojoumi, Farshad
Ajami, Majid
author_facet Dastorani, Mehdi
Shourvarzi, Behnam
Nojoumi, Farshad
Ajami, Majid
author_sort Dastorani, Mehdi
collection PubMed
description STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Different materials have been used to repair root perforations, the most successful of which is mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). It is technically difficult to use MTA for perforation repair. Recently, some bio-ceramic sealers such as Endoseal MTA were introduced to repair the perforation site during root filling, which decreases the technical difficulty of this procedure. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the bacterial microleakage of Pro-Root MTA and Endoseal MTA sealer in root perforation repair. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This in vitro experimental study evaluated 40 extracted canine teeth. After root canal cleaning and shaping, a root perforation was artificially created at 7 mm below the cementoenamel junction. The teeth were then randomly divided into two experimental groups (n=18) of Pro-Root MTA and Endoseal MTA, and two positive and negative control groups (n=2). Perforation sealing and root canal filling were performed in the two experimental groups according to the manufacturers’ instructions. After sterilization of the whole system with gamma ray, microleakage was tested using a double-chamber model. Data regarding the presence/absence of microleakage were reported after 35 days. The data were analyzed by SPSS software using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two experimental groups regarding bacterial microleakage (p> 0.05). CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this study, it can be concluded that the sealing ability of perforation repair with Endoseal MTA Sealer and Pro-Root MTA was comparable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8206596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82065962021-06-18 Comparison of Bacterial Microleakage of Endoseal MTA Sealer and Pro-Root MTA in Root Perforation Dastorani, Mehdi Shourvarzi, Behnam Nojoumi, Farshad Ajami, Majid J Dent (Shiraz) Original Article STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Different materials have been used to repair root perforations, the most successful of which is mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). It is technically difficult to use MTA for perforation repair. Recently, some bio-ceramic sealers such as Endoseal MTA were introduced to repair the perforation site during root filling, which decreases the technical difficulty of this procedure. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the bacterial microleakage of Pro-Root MTA and Endoseal MTA sealer in root perforation repair. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This in vitro experimental study evaluated 40 extracted canine teeth. After root canal cleaning and shaping, a root perforation was artificially created at 7 mm below the cementoenamel junction. The teeth were then randomly divided into two experimental groups (n=18) of Pro-Root MTA and Endoseal MTA, and two positive and negative control groups (n=2). Perforation sealing and root canal filling were performed in the two experimental groups according to the manufacturers’ instructions. After sterilization of the whole system with gamma ray, microleakage was tested using a double-chamber model. Data regarding the presence/absence of microleakage were reported after 35 days. The data were analyzed by SPSS software using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two experimental groups regarding bacterial microleakage (p> 0.05). CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this study, it can be concluded that the sealing ability of perforation repair with Endoseal MTA Sealer and Pro-Root MTA was comparable. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8206596/ /pubmed/34150945 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.86042.1164 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License, ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dastorani, Mehdi
Shourvarzi, Behnam
Nojoumi, Farshad
Ajami, Majid
Comparison of Bacterial Microleakage of Endoseal MTA Sealer and Pro-Root MTA in Root Perforation
title Comparison of Bacterial Microleakage of Endoseal MTA Sealer and Pro-Root MTA in Root Perforation
title_full Comparison of Bacterial Microleakage of Endoseal MTA Sealer and Pro-Root MTA in Root Perforation
title_fullStr Comparison of Bacterial Microleakage of Endoseal MTA Sealer and Pro-Root MTA in Root Perforation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Bacterial Microleakage of Endoseal MTA Sealer and Pro-Root MTA in Root Perforation
title_short Comparison of Bacterial Microleakage of Endoseal MTA Sealer and Pro-Root MTA in Root Perforation
title_sort comparison of bacterial microleakage of endoseal mta sealer and pro-root mta in root perforation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8206596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34150945
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.86042.1164
work_keys_str_mv AT dastoranimehdi comparisonofbacterialmicroleakageofendosealmtasealerandprorootmtainrootperforation
AT shourvarzibehnam comparisonofbacterialmicroleakageofendosealmtasealerandprorootmtainrootperforation
AT nojoumifarshad comparisonofbacterialmicroleakageofendosealmtasealerandprorootmtainrootperforation
AT ajamimajid comparisonofbacterialmicroleakageofendosealmtasealerandprorootmtainrootperforation