Cargando…

Impact of the COVID‐19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators

BACKGROUND: In Italy, a nationwide full lockdown was declared between March and May 2020 to hinder the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. The potential individual health effects of long‐term isolation are largely unknown. The current study investigated the arrhythmic consequences of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sassone, Biagio, Virzì, Santo, Bertini, Matteo, Pasanisi, Giovanni, Manzoli, Lamberto, Myers, Jonathan, Grazzi, Giovanni, Muser, Daniele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34022067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14280
_version_ 1783708708130258944
author Sassone, Biagio
Virzì, Santo
Bertini, Matteo
Pasanisi, Giovanni
Manzoli, Lamberto
Myers, Jonathan
Grazzi, Giovanni
Muser, Daniele
author_facet Sassone, Biagio
Virzì, Santo
Bertini, Matteo
Pasanisi, Giovanni
Manzoli, Lamberto
Myers, Jonathan
Grazzi, Giovanni
Muser, Daniele
author_sort Sassone, Biagio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Italy, a nationwide full lockdown was declared between March and May 2020 to hinder the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. The potential individual health effects of long‐term isolation are largely unknown. The current study investigated the arrhythmic consequences of the COVID‐19 lockdown in patients with defibrillators (ICDs) living in the province of Ferrara, Italy. METHODS: Both the arrhythmias and the delivered ICD therapies as notified by the devices were prospectively collected during the lockdown period (P1) and compared to those occurred during the 10 weeks before the lockdown began (P2) and during the same period in 2019 (P3). Changes in outcome over the three study periods were evaluated for significance using McNemar's test. RESULTS: A total of 413 patients were included in the analysis. No differences were found concerning either arrhythmias or shocks or anti‐tachycardia pacing. Only the number of patients experiencing non‐sustained ventricular tachycardias (NSVTs) during P1 significantly decreased as compared to P2 (p = 0.026) and P3 (p = 0.009). The subgroup analysis showed a significant decrease in NSVTs during P1 for men (vs. P2, p = 0.014; vs. P3, p = 0.040) and younger patients (vs. P2, p = 0.002; vs. P3, p = 0.040) and for ischemic etiology (vs. P2, p = 0.003). No arrhythmic deaths occurred during P1. CONCLUSIONS: The complete nationwide lockdown, as declared by the Italian government during the first COVID‐19 pandemic peak, did not impact on the incidence of arrhythmias in an urban cohort of patients with ICDs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8207039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82070392021-06-16 Impact of the COVID‐19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators Sassone, Biagio Virzì, Santo Bertini, Matteo Pasanisi, Giovanni Manzoli, Lamberto Myers, Jonathan Grazzi, Giovanni Muser, Daniele Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Devices BACKGROUND: In Italy, a nationwide full lockdown was declared between March and May 2020 to hinder the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. The potential individual health effects of long‐term isolation are largely unknown. The current study investigated the arrhythmic consequences of the COVID‐19 lockdown in patients with defibrillators (ICDs) living in the province of Ferrara, Italy. METHODS: Both the arrhythmias and the delivered ICD therapies as notified by the devices were prospectively collected during the lockdown period (P1) and compared to those occurred during the 10 weeks before the lockdown began (P2) and during the same period in 2019 (P3). Changes in outcome over the three study periods were evaluated for significance using McNemar's test. RESULTS: A total of 413 patients were included in the analysis. No differences were found concerning either arrhythmias or shocks or anti‐tachycardia pacing. Only the number of patients experiencing non‐sustained ventricular tachycardias (NSVTs) during P1 significantly decreased as compared to P2 (p = 0.026) and P3 (p = 0.009). The subgroup analysis showed a significant decrease in NSVTs during P1 for men (vs. P2, p = 0.014; vs. P3, p = 0.040) and younger patients (vs. P2, p = 0.002; vs. P3, p = 0.040) and for ischemic etiology (vs. P2, p = 0.003). No arrhythmic deaths occurred during P1. CONCLUSIONS: The complete nationwide lockdown, as declared by the Italian government during the first COVID‐19 pandemic peak, did not impact on the incidence of arrhythmias in an urban cohort of patients with ICDs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-28 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8207039/ /pubmed/34022067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14280 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Devices
Sassone, Biagio
Virzì, Santo
Bertini, Matteo
Pasanisi, Giovanni
Manzoli, Lamberto
Myers, Jonathan
Grazzi, Giovanni
Muser, Daniele
Impact of the COVID‐19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators
title Impact of the COVID‐19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators
title_full Impact of the COVID‐19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators
title_fullStr Impact of the COVID‐19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the COVID‐19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators
title_short Impact of the COVID‐19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators
title_sort impact of the covid‐19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators
topic Devices
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34022067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14280
work_keys_str_mv AT sassonebiagio impactofthecovid19lockdownonthearrhythmicburdenofpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT virzisanto impactofthecovid19lockdownonthearrhythmicburdenofpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT bertinimatteo impactofthecovid19lockdownonthearrhythmicburdenofpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT pasanisigiovanni impactofthecovid19lockdownonthearrhythmicburdenofpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT manzolilamberto impactofthecovid19lockdownonthearrhythmicburdenofpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT myersjonathan impactofthecovid19lockdownonthearrhythmicburdenofpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT grazzigiovanni impactofthecovid19lockdownonthearrhythmicburdenofpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT muserdaniele impactofthecovid19lockdownonthearrhythmicburdenofpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators