Cargando…
Impact of the COVID‐19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators
BACKGROUND: In Italy, a nationwide full lockdown was declared between March and May 2020 to hinder the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. The potential individual health effects of long‐term isolation are largely unknown. The current study investigated the arrhythmic consequences of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34022067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14280 |
_version_ | 1783708708130258944 |
---|---|
author | Sassone, Biagio Virzì, Santo Bertini, Matteo Pasanisi, Giovanni Manzoli, Lamberto Myers, Jonathan Grazzi, Giovanni Muser, Daniele |
author_facet | Sassone, Biagio Virzì, Santo Bertini, Matteo Pasanisi, Giovanni Manzoli, Lamberto Myers, Jonathan Grazzi, Giovanni Muser, Daniele |
author_sort | Sassone, Biagio |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In Italy, a nationwide full lockdown was declared between March and May 2020 to hinder the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. The potential individual health effects of long‐term isolation are largely unknown. The current study investigated the arrhythmic consequences of the COVID‐19 lockdown in patients with defibrillators (ICDs) living in the province of Ferrara, Italy. METHODS: Both the arrhythmias and the delivered ICD therapies as notified by the devices were prospectively collected during the lockdown period (P1) and compared to those occurred during the 10 weeks before the lockdown began (P2) and during the same period in 2019 (P3). Changes in outcome over the three study periods were evaluated for significance using McNemar's test. RESULTS: A total of 413 patients were included in the analysis. No differences were found concerning either arrhythmias or shocks or anti‐tachycardia pacing. Only the number of patients experiencing non‐sustained ventricular tachycardias (NSVTs) during P1 significantly decreased as compared to P2 (p = 0.026) and P3 (p = 0.009). The subgroup analysis showed a significant decrease in NSVTs during P1 for men (vs. P2, p = 0.014; vs. P3, p = 0.040) and younger patients (vs. P2, p = 0.002; vs. P3, p = 0.040) and for ischemic etiology (vs. P2, p = 0.003). No arrhythmic deaths occurred during P1. CONCLUSIONS: The complete nationwide lockdown, as declared by the Italian government during the first COVID‐19 pandemic peak, did not impact on the incidence of arrhythmias in an urban cohort of patients with ICDs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8207039 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82070392021-06-16 Impact of the COVID‐19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators Sassone, Biagio Virzì, Santo Bertini, Matteo Pasanisi, Giovanni Manzoli, Lamberto Myers, Jonathan Grazzi, Giovanni Muser, Daniele Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Devices BACKGROUND: In Italy, a nationwide full lockdown was declared between March and May 2020 to hinder the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. The potential individual health effects of long‐term isolation are largely unknown. The current study investigated the arrhythmic consequences of the COVID‐19 lockdown in patients with defibrillators (ICDs) living in the province of Ferrara, Italy. METHODS: Both the arrhythmias and the delivered ICD therapies as notified by the devices were prospectively collected during the lockdown period (P1) and compared to those occurred during the 10 weeks before the lockdown began (P2) and during the same period in 2019 (P3). Changes in outcome over the three study periods were evaluated for significance using McNemar's test. RESULTS: A total of 413 patients were included in the analysis. No differences were found concerning either arrhythmias or shocks or anti‐tachycardia pacing. Only the number of patients experiencing non‐sustained ventricular tachycardias (NSVTs) during P1 significantly decreased as compared to P2 (p = 0.026) and P3 (p = 0.009). The subgroup analysis showed a significant decrease in NSVTs during P1 for men (vs. P2, p = 0.014; vs. P3, p = 0.040) and younger patients (vs. P2, p = 0.002; vs. P3, p = 0.040) and for ischemic etiology (vs. P2, p = 0.003). No arrhythmic deaths occurred during P1. CONCLUSIONS: The complete nationwide lockdown, as declared by the Italian government during the first COVID‐19 pandemic peak, did not impact on the incidence of arrhythmias in an urban cohort of patients with ICDs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-28 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8207039/ /pubmed/34022067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14280 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Devices Sassone, Biagio Virzì, Santo Bertini, Matteo Pasanisi, Giovanni Manzoli, Lamberto Myers, Jonathan Grazzi, Giovanni Muser, Daniele Impact of the COVID‐19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators |
title | Impact of the COVID‐19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators |
title_full | Impact of the COVID‐19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators |
title_fullStr | Impact of the COVID‐19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of the COVID‐19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators |
title_short | Impact of the COVID‐19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators |
title_sort | impact of the covid‐19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators |
topic | Devices |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34022067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14280 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sassonebiagio impactofthecovid19lockdownonthearrhythmicburdenofpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators AT virzisanto impactofthecovid19lockdownonthearrhythmicburdenofpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators AT bertinimatteo impactofthecovid19lockdownonthearrhythmicburdenofpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators AT pasanisigiovanni impactofthecovid19lockdownonthearrhythmicburdenofpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators AT manzolilamberto impactofthecovid19lockdownonthearrhythmicburdenofpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators AT myersjonathan impactofthecovid19lockdownonthearrhythmicburdenofpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators AT grazzigiovanni impactofthecovid19lockdownonthearrhythmicburdenofpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators AT muserdaniele impactofthecovid19lockdownonthearrhythmicburdenofpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators |