Cargando…
Hot stuff in the bushes: Thermal imagers and the detection of burrows in vegetated sites
1. Thermal imaging technology is a developing field in wildlife management. Most thermal imaging work in wildlife science has been limited to larger ungulates and surface‐dwelling mammals. Little work has been undertaken on the use of thermal imagers to detect fossorial animals and/or their burrows....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34141227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7491 |
_version_ | 1783708775589347328 |
---|---|
author | Cox, Tarnya E. Matthews, Robert Halverson, Grant Morris, Stephen |
author_facet | Cox, Tarnya E. Matthews, Robert Halverson, Grant Morris, Stephen |
author_sort | Cox, Tarnya E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | 1. Thermal imaging technology is a developing field in wildlife management. Most thermal imaging work in wildlife science has been limited to larger ungulates and surface‐dwelling mammals. Little work has been undertaken on the use of thermal imagers to detect fossorial animals and/or their burrows. Survey methods such as white‐light spotlighting can fail to detect the presence of burrows (and therefore the animals within), particularly in areas where vegetation obscures burrows. Thermal imagers offer an opportunity to detect the radiant heat from these burrows, and therefore the presence of the animal, particularly in vegetated areas. Thermal imaging technology has become increasingly available through the provision of smaller, more cost‐effective units. Their integration with drone technology provides opportunities for researchers and land managers to utilize this technology in their research/management practices. 2. We investigated the ability of both consumer (<AUD$20,000) and professional imagers (>AUD$65,000) mounted on drones to detect rabbit burrows (warrens) and entrances in the landscape as compared to visual assessment. 3. Thermal imagery and visual inspection detected active rabbit warrens when vegetation was scarce. The presence of vegetation was a significant factor in detecting entrances (p < .001, α = 0.05). The consumer imager did not detect as many warren entrances as either the professional imager or visual inspection (p = .009, α = 0.05). Active warren entrances obscured by vegetation could not be accurately identified on exported imagery from the consumer imager and several false‐positive detections occurred when reviewing this footage. 4. We suggest that the exportable frame rate (Hz) was the key factor in image quality and subsequent false‐positive detections. This feature should be considered when selecting imagers and suggest that a minimum export rate of 30 Hz is required. Thermal imagers are a useful additional tool to aid in identification of entrances for active warrens and professional imagers detected more warrens and entrances than either consumer imagers or visual inspection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8207428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82074282021-06-16 Hot stuff in the bushes: Thermal imagers and the detection of burrows in vegetated sites Cox, Tarnya E. Matthews, Robert Halverson, Grant Morris, Stephen Ecol Evol Original Research 1. Thermal imaging technology is a developing field in wildlife management. Most thermal imaging work in wildlife science has been limited to larger ungulates and surface‐dwelling mammals. Little work has been undertaken on the use of thermal imagers to detect fossorial animals and/or their burrows. Survey methods such as white‐light spotlighting can fail to detect the presence of burrows (and therefore the animals within), particularly in areas where vegetation obscures burrows. Thermal imagers offer an opportunity to detect the radiant heat from these burrows, and therefore the presence of the animal, particularly in vegetated areas. Thermal imaging technology has become increasingly available through the provision of smaller, more cost‐effective units. Their integration with drone technology provides opportunities for researchers and land managers to utilize this technology in their research/management practices. 2. We investigated the ability of both consumer (<AUD$20,000) and professional imagers (>AUD$65,000) mounted on drones to detect rabbit burrows (warrens) and entrances in the landscape as compared to visual assessment. 3. Thermal imagery and visual inspection detected active rabbit warrens when vegetation was scarce. The presence of vegetation was a significant factor in detecting entrances (p < .001, α = 0.05). The consumer imager did not detect as many warren entrances as either the professional imager or visual inspection (p = .009, α = 0.05). Active warren entrances obscured by vegetation could not be accurately identified on exported imagery from the consumer imager and several false‐positive detections occurred when reviewing this footage. 4. We suggest that the exportable frame rate (Hz) was the key factor in image quality and subsequent false‐positive detections. This feature should be considered when selecting imagers and suggest that a minimum export rate of 30 Hz is required. Thermal imagers are a useful additional tool to aid in identification of entrances for active warrens and professional imagers detected more warrens and entrances than either consumer imagers or visual inspection. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8207428/ /pubmed/34141227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7491 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Cox, Tarnya E. Matthews, Robert Halverson, Grant Morris, Stephen Hot stuff in the bushes: Thermal imagers and the detection of burrows in vegetated sites |
title | Hot stuff in the bushes: Thermal imagers and the detection of burrows in vegetated sites |
title_full | Hot stuff in the bushes: Thermal imagers and the detection of burrows in vegetated sites |
title_fullStr | Hot stuff in the bushes: Thermal imagers and the detection of burrows in vegetated sites |
title_full_unstemmed | Hot stuff in the bushes: Thermal imagers and the detection of burrows in vegetated sites |
title_short | Hot stuff in the bushes: Thermal imagers and the detection of burrows in vegetated sites |
title_sort | hot stuff in the bushes: thermal imagers and the detection of burrows in vegetated sites |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34141227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7491 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coxtarnyae hotstuffinthebushesthermalimagersandthedetectionofburrowsinvegetatedsites AT matthewsrobert hotstuffinthebushesthermalimagersandthedetectionofburrowsinvegetatedsites AT halversongrant hotstuffinthebushesthermalimagersandthedetectionofburrowsinvegetatedsites AT morrisstephen hotstuffinthebushesthermalimagersandthedetectionofburrowsinvegetatedsites |