Cargando…

Hot stuff in the bushes: Thermal imagers and the detection of burrows in vegetated sites

1. Thermal imaging technology is a developing field in wildlife management. Most thermal imaging work in wildlife science has been limited to larger ungulates and surface‐dwelling mammals. Little work has been undertaken on the use of thermal imagers to detect fossorial animals and/or their burrows....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cox, Tarnya E., Matthews, Robert, Halverson, Grant, Morris, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34141227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7491
_version_ 1783708775589347328
author Cox, Tarnya E.
Matthews, Robert
Halverson, Grant
Morris, Stephen
author_facet Cox, Tarnya E.
Matthews, Robert
Halverson, Grant
Morris, Stephen
author_sort Cox, Tarnya E.
collection PubMed
description 1. Thermal imaging technology is a developing field in wildlife management. Most thermal imaging work in wildlife science has been limited to larger ungulates and surface‐dwelling mammals. Little work has been undertaken on the use of thermal imagers to detect fossorial animals and/or their burrows. Survey methods such as white‐light spotlighting can fail to detect the presence of burrows (and therefore the animals within), particularly in areas where vegetation obscures burrows. Thermal imagers offer an opportunity to detect the radiant heat from these burrows, and therefore the presence of the animal, particularly in vegetated areas. Thermal imaging technology has become increasingly available through the provision of smaller, more cost‐effective units. Their integration with drone technology provides opportunities for researchers and land managers to utilize this technology in their research/management practices. 2. We investigated the ability of both consumer (<AUD$20,000) and professional imagers (>AUD$65,000) mounted on drones to detect rabbit burrows (warrens) and entrances in the landscape as compared to visual assessment. 3. Thermal imagery and visual inspection detected active rabbit warrens when vegetation was scarce. The presence of vegetation was a significant factor in detecting entrances (p < .001, α = 0.05). The consumer imager did not detect as many warren entrances as either the professional imager or visual inspection (p = .009, α = 0.05). Active warren entrances obscured by vegetation could not be accurately identified on exported imagery from the consumer imager and several false‐positive detections occurred when reviewing this footage. 4. We suggest that the exportable frame rate (Hz) was the key factor in image quality and subsequent false‐positive detections. This feature should be considered when selecting imagers and suggest that a minimum export rate of 30 Hz is required. Thermal imagers are a useful additional tool to aid in identification of entrances for active warrens and professional imagers detected more warrens and entrances than either consumer imagers or visual inspection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8207428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82074282021-06-16 Hot stuff in the bushes: Thermal imagers and the detection of burrows in vegetated sites Cox, Tarnya E. Matthews, Robert Halverson, Grant Morris, Stephen Ecol Evol Original Research 1. Thermal imaging technology is a developing field in wildlife management. Most thermal imaging work in wildlife science has been limited to larger ungulates and surface‐dwelling mammals. Little work has been undertaken on the use of thermal imagers to detect fossorial animals and/or their burrows. Survey methods such as white‐light spotlighting can fail to detect the presence of burrows (and therefore the animals within), particularly in areas where vegetation obscures burrows. Thermal imagers offer an opportunity to detect the radiant heat from these burrows, and therefore the presence of the animal, particularly in vegetated areas. Thermal imaging technology has become increasingly available through the provision of smaller, more cost‐effective units. Their integration with drone technology provides opportunities for researchers and land managers to utilize this technology in their research/management practices. 2. We investigated the ability of both consumer (<AUD$20,000) and professional imagers (>AUD$65,000) mounted on drones to detect rabbit burrows (warrens) and entrances in the landscape as compared to visual assessment. 3. Thermal imagery and visual inspection detected active rabbit warrens when vegetation was scarce. The presence of vegetation was a significant factor in detecting entrances (p < .001, α = 0.05). The consumer imager did not detect as many warren entrances as either the professional imager or visual inspection (p = .009, α = 0.05). Active warren entrances obscured by vegetation could not be accurately identified on exported imagery from the consumer imager and several false‐positive detections occurred when reviewing this footage. 4. We suggest that the exportable frame rate (Hz) was the key factor in image quality and subsequent false‐positive detections. This feature should be considered when selecting imagers and suggest that a minimum export rate of 30 Hz is required. Thermal imagers are a useful additional tool to aid in identification of entrances for active warrens and professional imagers detected more warrens and entrances than either consumer imagers or visual inspection. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8207428/ /pubmed/34141227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7491 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cox, Tarnya E.
Matthews, Robert
Halverson, Grant
Morris, Stephen
Hot stuff in the bushes: Thermal imagers and the detection of burrows in vegetated sites
title Hot stuff in the bushes: Thermal imagers and the detection of burrows in vegetated sites
title_full Hot stuff in the bushes: Thermal imagers and the detection of burrows in vegetated sites
title_fullStr Hot stuff in the bushes: Thermal imagers and the detection of burrows in vegetated sites
title_full_unstemmed Hot stuff in the bushes: Thermal imagers and the detection of burrows in vegetated sites
title_short Hot stuff in the bushes: Thermal imagers and the detection of burrows in vegetated sites
title_sort hot stuff in the bushes: thermal imagers and the detection of burrows in vegetated sites
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34141227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7491
work_keys_str_mv AT coxtarnyae hotstuffinthebushesthermalimagersandthedetectionofburrowsinvegetatedsites
AT matthewsrobert hotstuffinthebushesthermalimagersandthedetectionofburrowsinvegetatedsites
AT halversongrant hotstuffinthebushesthermalimagersandthedetectionofburrowsinvegetatedsites
AT morrisstephen hotstuffinthebushesthermalimagersandthedetectionofburrowsinvegetatedsites