Cargando…

Identifying “vital attributes” for assessing disturbance–recovery potential of seafloor communities

Despite a long history of disturbance–recovery research, we still lack a generalizable understanding of the attributes that drive community recovery potential in seafloor ecosystems. Marine soft‐sediment ecosystems encompass a range of heterogeneity from simple low‐diversity habitats with limited bi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gladstone‐Gallagher, Rebecca V., Hewitt, Judi E., Thrush, Simon F., Brustolin, Marco C., Villnäs, Anna, Valanko, Sebastian, Norkko, Alf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34141205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7420
_version_ 1783708776991293440
author Gladstone‐Gallagher, Rebecca V.
Hewitt, Judi E.
Thrush, Simon F.
Brustolin, Marco C.
Villnäs, Anna
Valanko, Sebastian
Norkko, Alf
author_facet Gladstone‐Gallagher, Rebecca V.
Hewitt, Judi E.
Thrush, Simon F.
Brustolin, Marco C.
Villnäs, Anna
Valanko, Sebastian
Norkko, Alf
author_sort Gladstone‐Gallagher, Rebecca V.
collection PubMed
description Despite a long history of disturbance–recovery research, we still lack a generalizable understanding of the attributes that drive community recovery potential in seafloor ecosystems. Marine soft‐sediment ecosystems encompass a range of heterogeneity from simple low‐diversity habitats with limited biogenic structure, to species‐rich systems with complex biogenic habitat structure. These differences in biological heterogeneity are a product of natural conditions and disturbance regimes. To search for unifying attributes, we explore whether a set of simple traits can characterize community disturbance–recovery potential using seafloor patch‐disturbance experiments conducted in two different soft‐sediment landscapes. The two landscapes represent two ends of a spectrum of landscape biotic heterogeneity in order to consider multi‐scale disturbance–recovery processes. We consider traits at different levels of biological organization, from the biological traits of individual species, to the traits of species at the landscape scale associated with their occurrence across the landscape and their ability to be dominant. We show that in a biotically heterogeneous landscape (Kawau Bay, New Zealand), seafloor community recovery is stochastic, there is high species turnover, and the landscape‐scale traits are good predictors of recovery. In contrast, in a biotically homogeneous landscape (Baltic Sea), the options for recovery are constrained, the recovery pathway is thus more deterministic and the scale of recovery traits important for determining recovery switches to the individual species biological traits within the disturbed patch. Our results imply that these simple, yet sophisticated, traits can be effectively used to characterize community recovery potential and highlight the role of landscapes in providing resilience to patch‐scale disturbances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8207434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82074342021-06-16 Identifying “vital attributes” for assessing disturbance–recovery potential of seafloor communities Gladstone‐Gallagher, Rebecca V. Hewitt, Judi E. Thrush, Simon F. Brustolin, Marco C. Villnäs, Anna Valanko, Sebastian Norkko, Alf Ecol Evol Original Research Despite a long history of disturbance–recovery research, we still lack a generalizable understanding of the attributes that drive community recovery potential in seafloor ecosystems. Marine soft‐sediment ecosystems encompass a range of heterogeneity from simple low‐diversity habitats with limited biogenic structure, to species‐rich systems with complex biogenic habitat structure. These differences in biological heterogeneity are a product of natural conditions and disturbance regimes. To search for unifying attributes, we explore whether a set of simple traits can characterize community disturbance–recovery potential using seafloor patch‐disturbance experiments conducted in two different soft‐sediment landscapes. The two landscapes represent two ends of a spectrum of landscape biotic heterogeneity in order to consider multi‐scale disturbance–recovery processes. We consider traits at different levels of biological organization, from the biological traits of individual species, to the traits of species at the landscape scale associated with their occurrence across the landscape and their ability to be dominant. We show that in a biotically heterogeneous landscape (Kawau Bay, New Zealand), seafloor community recovery is stochastic, there is high species turnover, and the landscape‐scale traits are good predictors of recovery. In contrast, in a biotically homogeneous landscape (Baltic Sea), the options for recovery are constrained, the recovery pathway is thus more deterministic and the scale of recovery traits important for determining recovery switches to the individual species biological traits within the disturbed patch. Our results imply that these simple, yet sophisticated, traits can be effectively used to characterize community recovery potential and highlight the role of landscapes in providing resilience to patch‐scale disturbances. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8207434/ /pubmed/34141205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7420 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gladstone‐Gallagher, Rebecca V.
Hewitt, Judi E.
Thrush, Simon F.
Brustolin, Marco C.
Villnäs, Anna
Valanko, Sebastian
Norkko, Alf
Identifying “vital attributes” for assessing disturbance–recovery potential of seafloor communities
title Identifying “vital attributes” for assessing disturbance–recovery potential of seafloor communities
title_full Identifying “vital attributes” for assessing disturbance–recovery potential of seafloor communities
title_fullStr Identifying “vital attributes” for assessing disturbance–recovery potential of seafloor communities
title_full_unstemmed Identifying “vital attributes” for assessing disturbance–recovery potential of seafloor communities
title_short Identifying “vital attributes” for assessing disturbance–recovery potential of seafloor communities
title_sort identifying “vital attributes” for assessing disturbance–recovery potential of seafloor communities
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34141205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7420
work_keys_str_mv AT gladstonegallagherrebeccav identifyingvitalattributesforassessingdisturbancerecoverypotentialofseafloorcommunities
AT hewittjudie identifyingvitalattributesforassessingdisturbancerecoverypotentialofseafloorcommunities
AT thrushsimonf identifyingvitalattributesforassessingdisturbancerecoverypotentialofseafloorcommunities
AT brustolinmarcoc identifyingvitalattributesforassessingdisturbancerecoverypotentialofseafloorcommunities
AT villnasanna identifyingvitalattributesforassessingdisturbancerecoverypotentialofseafloorcommunities
AT valankosebastian identifyingvitalattributesforassessingdisturbancerecoverypotentialofseafloorcommunities
AT norkkoalf identifyingvitalattributesforassessingdisturbancerecoverypotentialofseafloorcommunities