Cargando…

Simulation study and comparative evaluation of viral contiguous sequence identification tools

BACKGROUND: Viruses, including bacteriophages, are important components of environmental and human associated microbial communities. Viruses can act as extracellular reservoirs of bacterial genes, can mediate microbiome dynamics, and can influence the virulence of clinical pathogens. Various targete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glickman, Cody, Hendrix, Jo, Strong, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34130621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04242-0
_version_ 1783708801409482752
author Glickman, Cody
Hendrix, Jo
Strong, Michael
author_facet Glickman, Cody
Hendrix, Jo
Strong, Michael
author_sort Glickman, Cody
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Viruses, including bacteriophages, are important components of environmental and human associated microbial communities. Viruses can act as extracellular reservoirs of bacterial genes, can mediate microbiome dynamics, and can influence the virulence of clinical pathogens. Various targeted metagenomic analysis techniques detect viral sequences, but these methods often exclude large and genome integrated viruses. In this study, we evaluate and compare the ability of nine state-of-the-art bioinformatic tools, including Vibrant, VirSorter, VirSorter2, VirFinder, DeepVirFinder, MetaPhinder, Kraken 2, Phybrid, and a BLAST search using identified proteins from the Earth Virome Pipeline to identify viral contiguous sequences (contigs) across simulated metagenomes with different read distributions, taxonomic compositions, and complexities. RESULTS: Of the tools tested in this study, VirSorter achieved the best F1 score while Vibrant had the highest average F1 score at predicting integrated prophages. Though less balanced in its precision and recall, Kraken2 had the highest average precision by a substantial margin. We introduced the machine learning tool, Phybrid, which demonstrated an improvement in average F1 score over tools such as MetaPhinder. The tool utilizes machine learning with both gene content and nucleotide features. The addition of nucleotide features improves the precision and recall compared to the gene content features alone.Viral identification by all tools was not impacted by underlying read distribution but did improve with contig length. Tool performance was inversely related to taxonomic complexity and varied by the phage host. For instance, Rhizobium and Enterococcus phages were identified consistently by the tools; whereas, Neisseria prophage sequences were commonly missed in this study. CONCLUSION: This study benchmarked the performance of nine state-of-the-art bioinformatic tools to identify viral contigs across different simulation conditions. This study explored the ability of the tools to identify integrated prophage elements traditionally excluded from targeted sequencing approaches. Our comprehensive analysis of viral identification tools to assess their performance in a variety of situations provides valuable insights to viral researchers looking to mine viral elements from publicly available metagenomic data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12859-021-04242-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8207588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82075882021-06-16 Simulation study and comparative evaluation of viral contiguous sequence identification tools Glickman, Cody Hendrix, Jo Strong, Michael BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: Viruses, including bacteriophages, are important components of environmental and human associated microbial communities. Viruses can act as extracellular reservoirs of bacterial genes, can mediate microbiome dynamics, and can influence the virulence of clinical pathogens. Various targeted metagenomic analysis techniques detect viral sequences, but these methods often exclude large and genome integrated viruses. In this study, we evaluate and compare the ability of nine state-of-the-art bioinformatic tools, including Vibrant, VirSorter, VirSorter2, VirFinder, DeepVirFinder, MetaPhinder, Kraken 2, Phybrid, and a BLAST search using identified proteins from the Earth Virome Pipeline to identify viral contiguous sequences (contigs) across simulated metagenomes with different read distributions, taxonomic compositions, and complexities. RESULTS: Of the tools tested in this study, VirSorter achieved the best F1 score while Vibrant had the highest average F1 score at predicting integrated prophages. Though less balanced in its precision and recall, Kraken2 had the highest average precision by a substantial margin. We introduced the machine learning tool, Phybrid, which demonstrated an improvement in average F1 score over tools such as MetaPhinder. The tool utilizes machine learning with both gene content and nucleotide features. The addition of nucleotide features improves the precision and recall compared to the gene content features alone.Viral identification by all tools was not impacted by underlying read distribution but did improve with contig length. Tool performance was inversely related to taxonomic complexity and varied by the phage host. For instance, Rhizobium and Enterococcus phages were identified consistently by the tools; whereas, Neisseria prophage sequences were commonly missed in this study. CONCLUSION: This study benchmarked the performance of nine state-of-the-art bioinformatic tools to identify viral contigs across different simulation conditions. This study explored the ability of the tools to identify integrated prophage elements traditionally excluded from targeted sequencing approaches. Our comprehensive analysis of viral identification tools to assess their performance in a variety of situations provides valuable insights to viral researchers looking to mine viral elements from publicly available metagenomic data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12859-021-04242-0. BioMed Central 2021-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8207588/ /pubmed/34130621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04242-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Glickman, Cody
Hendrix, Jo
Strong, Michael
Simulation study and comparative evaluation of viral contiguous sequence identification tools
title Simulation study and comparative evaluation of viral contiguous sequence identification tools
title_full Simulation study and comparative evaluation of viral contiguous sequence identification tools
title_fullStr Simulation study and comparative evaluation of viral contiguous sequence identification tools
title_full_unstemmed Simulation study and comparative evaluation of viral contiguous sequence identification tools
title_short Simulation study and comparative evaluation of viral contiguous sequence identification tools
title_sort simulation study and comparative evaluation of viral contiguous sequence identification tools
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34130621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04242-0
work_keys_str_mv AT glickmancody simulationstudyandcomparativeevaluationofviralcontiguoussequenceidentificationtools
AT hendrixjo simulationstudyandcomparativeevaluationofviralcontiguoussequenceidentificationtools
AT strongmichael simulationstudyandcomparativeevaluationofviralcontiguoussequenceidentificationtools