Cargando…

Postoperative wound assessment in cattle: How reliable is the back hand palpation?

BACKGROUND: As part of clinical wound assessment in bovine surgery, discrepancies in skin temperature are evaluated by placing the back of the hand on the area to be examined. Generally, an increased skin temperature at the wound site for a prolonged period is considered as an indicator of impaired...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Proios, Ioannis, Kusenda, Marian, Seiler, Christian, Siewert, Carsten, Seifert, Hermann, Kaske, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34134768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13620-021-00195-1
_version_ 1783708807701987328
author Proios, Ioannis
Kusenda, Marian
Seiler, Christian
Siewert, Carsten
Seifert, Hermann
Kaske, Martin
author_facet Proios, Ioannis
Kusenda, Marian
Seiler, Christian
Siewert, Carsten
Seifert, Hermann
Kaske, Martin
author_sort Proios, Ioannis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As part of clinical wound assessment in bovine surgery, discrepancies in skin temperature are evaluated by placing the back of the hand on the area to be examined. Generally, an increased skin temperature at the wound site for a prolonged period is considered as an indicator of impaired wound healing. The aim of this study was to verify the reliability of palpation under bovine practice conditions using laparotomy as an example. Fourteen cows (German Holstein) with a left displacement of the abomasum (LDA) without other severe concurrent diseases were examined preoperatively and once daily for ten days after surgery. The skin temperature of the wound site in the right flank was assessed by palpation, followed by thermographic evaluation using an infrared camera after a 45-min acclimatisation period, under standardised conditions in a closed examination room daily for 10 days. RESULTS: All the incisions healed without clinical detectable perturbances. The ambient temperature range during the study period was 7.8 − 24.1 °C. Two groups were retrospectively defined according to the ambient temperature: high ambient temperature (HT group; median: 20.2 °C 25/75 quartile: 18.5 °C / 21.7 °C; n = 6) and low ambient temperature (LT group; 10.8 °C; 9.4 °C / 12.8 °C; n = 8). The temperature differences (Δϑ) between the mean skin temperature of the wound site and a defined reference area cranial to the wound were assessed. A significant negative correlation was found between the ambient temperature (ϑ(Amb)) and Δϑ (r=-0.51; P < 0.001). The Δϑ was postoperatively higher in the cows in the LT group (median of the individual animals 0.8–2.5 °C) than in the HT group (0.1–0.5 °C; P < 0.05). In contrast to the thermographic findings, manual palpation rarely detected local hyperthermia (> 1 °C) at the wound site (sensitivity 0.20; specificity 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: The infrared thermography provides a more reliable assessment of temperature changes at the wound site in comparison to manual palpation. The ambient temperature markedly affects the extent of local hyperthermia at the wound site.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8207616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82076162021-06-16 Postoperative wound assessment in cattle: How reliable is the back hand palpation? Proios, Ioannis Kusenda, Marian Seiler, Christian Siewert, Carsten Seifert, Hermann Kaske, Martin Ir Vet J Research BACKGROUND: As part of clinical wound assessment in bovine surgery, discrepancies in skin temperature are evaluated by placing the back of the hand on the area to be examined. Generally, an increased skin temperature at the wound site for a prolonged period is considered as an indicator of impaired wound healing. The aim of this study was to verify the reliability of palpation under bovine practice conditions using laparotomy as an example. Fourteen cows (German Holstein) with a left displacement of the abomasum (LDA) without other severe concurrent diseases were examined preoperatively and once daily for ten days after surgery. The skin temperature of the wound site in the right flank was assessed by palpation, followed by thermographic evaluation using an infrared camera after a 45-min acclimatisation period, under standardised conditions in a closed examination room daily for 10 days. RESULTS: All the incisions healed without clinical detectable perturbances. The ambient temperature range during the study period was 7.8 − 24.1 °C. Two groups were retrospectively defined according to the ambient temperature: high ambient temperature (HT group; median: 20.2 °C 25/75 quartile: 18.5 °C / 21.7 °C; n = 6) and low ambient temperature (LT group; 10.8 °C; 9.4 °C / 12.8 °C; n = 8). The temperature differences (Δϑ) between the mean skin temperature of the wound site and a defined reference area cranial to the wound were assessed. A significant negative correlation was found between the ambient temperature (ϑ(Amb)) and Δϑ (r=-0.51; P < 0.001). The Δϑ was postoperatively higher in the cows in the LT group (median of the individual animals 0.8–2.5 °C) than in the HT group (0.1–0.5 °C; P < 0.05). In contrast to the thermographic findings, manual palpation rarely detected local hyperthermia (> 1 °C) at the wound site (sensitivity 0.20; specificity 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: The infrared thermography provides a more reliable assessment of temperature changes at the wound site in comparison to manual palpation. The ambient temperature markedly affects the extent of local hyperthermia at the wound site. BioMed Central 2021-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8207616/ /pubmed/34134768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13620-021-00195-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Proios, Ioannis
Kusenda, Marian
Seiler, Christian
Siewert, Carsten
Seifert, Hermann
Kaske, Martin
Postoperative wound assessment in cattle: How reliable is the back hand palpation?
title Postoperative wound assessment in cattle: How reliable is the back hand palpation?
title_full Postoperative wound assessment in cattle: How reliable is the back hand palpation?
title_fullStr Postoperative wound assessment in cattle: How reliable is the back hand palpation?
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative wound assessment in cattle: How reliable is the back hand palpation?
title_short Postoperative wound assessment in cattle: How reliable is the back hand palpation?
title_sort postoperative wound assessment in cattle: how reliable is the back hand palpation?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34134768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13620-021-00195-1
work_keys_str_mv AT proiosioannis postoperativewoundassessmentincattlehowreliableisthebackhandpalpation
AT kusendamarian postoperativewoundassessmentincattlehowreliableisthebackhandpalpation
AT seilerchristian postoperativewoundassessmentincattlehowreliableisthebackhandpalpation
AT siewertcarsten postoperativewoundassessmentincattlehowreliableisthebackhandpalpation
AT seiferthermann postoperativewoundassessmentincattlehowreliableisthebackhandpalpation
AT kaskemartin postoperativewoundassessmentincattlehowreliableisthebackhandpalpation