Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral nutritional supplements with nutritional counselling in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE: There is limited evidence regarding the economic effects of nutrition support in cancer patients. This study aims at investigating the cost-effectiveness profile of systematic oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) and re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Beatrice, Cereda, Emanuele, Caccialanza, Riccardo, Pedrazzoli, Paolo, Tarricone, Rosanna, Ciani, Oriana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34130709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-021-00291-7
_version_ 1783708809211936768
author Martin, Beatrice
Cereda, Emanuele
Caccialanza, Riccardo
Pedrazzoli, Paolo
Tarricone, Rosanna
Ciani, Oriana
author_facet Martin, Beatrice
Cereda, Emanuele
Caccialanza, Riccardo
Pedrazzoli, Paolo
Tarricone, Rosanna
Ciani, Oriana
author_sort Martin, Beatrice
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There is limited evidence regarding the economic effects of nutrition support in cancer patients. This study aims at investigating the cost-effectiveness profile of systematic oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) and receiving nutritional counseling. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis based on a RCT was performed to estimate direct medical costs, life years gained (LYG) and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) for nutritional counseling with or without ONS at 5-month and 6-year follow up time. Value of information analysis was performed to value the expected gain from reducing uncertainty through further data collection. RESULTS: ONS with nutritional counseling produced higher QALY than nutritional counseling alone (0.291 ± 0.087 vs 0.288 ± 0.087), however the difference was not significant (0.0027, P = 0.84). Mean costs were €987.60 vs €996.09, respectively in the treatment and control group (-€8.96, P = 0.98). The Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was -€3,277/QALY, with 55.4% probabilities of being cost-effective at a cost-effectiveness threshold of €30,000/QALY. The Expected Incremental Benefit was €95.16 and the Population Expected Value of Perfect Information was €8.6 million, implying that additional research is likely to be worthwhile. At a median 6-year follow up, the treatment group had a significantly better survival rate when adjusting for late effect (P = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Our findings provide the first evidence to inform decisions about funding and reimbursement of ONS in combination with nutritional counseling in HNC patients undergoing RT. ONS may improve quality of cancer care at no additional costs, however further research on the cost-effectiveness of nutritional supplementation is recommended. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02055833. Registered 5th February 2014 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02055833 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-021-00291-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8207624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82076242021-06-16 Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral nutritional supplements with nutritional counselling in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy Martin, Beatrice Cereda, Emanuele Caccialanza, Riccardo Pedrazzoli, Paolo Tarricone, Rosanna Ciani, Oriana Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research OBJECTIVE: There is limited evidence regarding the economic effects of nutrition support in cancer patients. This study aims at investigating the cost-effectiveness profile of systematic oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) and receiving nutritional counseling. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis based on a RCT was performed to estimate direct medical costs, life years gained (LYG) and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) for nutritional counseling with or without ONS at 5-month and 6-year follow up time. Value of information analysis was performed to value the expected gain from reducing uncertainty through further data collection. RESULTS: ONS with nutritional counseling produced higher QALY than nutritional counseling alone (0.291 ± 0.087 vs 0.288 ± 0.087), however the difference was not significant (0.0027, P = 0.84). Mean costs were €987.60 vs €996.09, respectively in the treatment and control group (-€8.96, P = 0.98). The Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was -€3,277/QALY, with 55.4% probabilities of being cost-effective at a cost-effectiveness threshold of €30,000/QALY. The Expected Incremental Benefit was €95.16 and the Population Expected Value of Perfect Information was €8.6 million, implying that additional research is likely to be worthwhile. At a median 6-year follow up, the treatment group had a significantly better survival rate when adjusting for late effect (P = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Our findings provide the first evidence to inform decisions about funding and reimbursement of ONS in combination with nutritional counseling in HNC patients undergoing RT. ONS may improve quality of cancer care at no additional costs, however further research on the cost-effectiveness of nutritional supplementation is recommended. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02055833. Registered 5th February 2014 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02055833 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-021-00291-7. BioMed Central 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8207624/ /pubmed/34130709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-021-00291-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Martin, Beatrice
Cereda, Emanuele
Caccialanza, Riccardo
Pedrazzoli, Paolo
Tarricone, Rosanna
Ciani, Oriana
Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral nutritional supplements with nutritional counselling in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral nutritional supplements with nutritional counselling in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral nutritional supplements with nutritional counselling in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral nutritional supplements with nutritional counselling in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral nutritional supplements with nutritional counselling in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral nutritional supplements with nutritional counselling in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of oral nutritional supplements with nutritional counselling in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34130709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-021-00291-7
work_keys_str_mv AT martinbeatrice costeffectivenessanalysisoforalnutritionalsupplementswithnutritionalcounsellinginheadandneckcancerpatientsundergoingradiotherapy
AT ceredaemanuele costeffectivenessanalysisoforalnutritionalsupplementswithnutritionalcounsellinginheadandneckcancerpatientsundergoingradiotherapy
AT caccialanzariccardo costeffectivenessanalysisoforalnutritionalsupplementswithnutritionalcounsellinginheadandneckcancerpatientsundergoingradiotherapy
AT pedrazzolipaolo costeffectivenessanalysisoforalnutritionalsupplementswithnutritionalcounsellinginheadandneckcancerpatientsundergoingradiotherapy
AT tarriconerosanna costeffectivenessanalysisoforalnutritionalsupplementswithnutritionalcounsellinginheadandneckcancerpatientsundergoingradiotherapy
AT cianioriana costeffectivenessanalysisoforalnutritionalsupplementswithnutritionalcounsellinginheadandneckcancerpatientsundergoingradiotherapy