Cargando…

Childbearing vs. clinical trial participation: is it one or the other?

Recent advances have shed light on the importance of early therapeutic intervention for neurodegenerative diseases. Primary prevention trials present a potential disease-modifying strategy for pre-symptomatic patients of autosomal dominant neurodegenerative diseases (ADND), such as early onset famil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hernandez, Sarah J., Hohsfield, Lindsay A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34130723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02930-2
_version_ 1783708817606836224
author Hernandez, Sarah J.
Hohsfield, Lindsay A.
author_facet Hernandez, Sarah J.
Hohsfield, Lindsay A.
author_sort Hernandez, Sarah J.
collection PubMed
description Recent advances have shed light on the importance of early therapeutic intervention for neurodegenerative diseases. Primary prevention trials present a potential disease-modifying strategy for pre-symptomatic patients of autosomal dominant neurodegenerative diseases (ADND), such as early onset familial Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Huntington’s disease (HD). As trials target earlier disease stages, however, prospective participants face new ethical and logistical challenges, namely childbearing and reproductive health decisions. Since pregnancy is an exclusion criteria for such trials, participants of reproductive age must choose between participating in research and having a family. Such decisions carry significant burdens for ADND patients that if left unaddressed could impact patient well-being and the field as whole. We use our perspective as scientists, advocates, and ADND family members to highlight current shortcomings in the field regarding trial participation and family planning issues for ADND patients and call for the establishment of a normative standard to address these concerns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8207669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82076692021-06-16 Childbearing vs. clinical trial participation: is it one or the other? Hernandez, Sarah J. Hohsfield, Lindsay A. J Transl Med Commentary Recent advances have shed light on the importance of early therapeutic intervention for neurodegenerative diseases. Primary prevention trials present a potential disease-modifying strategy for pre-symptomatic patients of autosomal dominant neurodegenerative diseases (ADND), such as early onset familial Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Huntington’s disease (HD). As trials target earlier disease stages, however, prospective participants face new ethical and logistical challenges, namely childbearing and reproductive health decisions. Since pregnancy is an exclusion criteria for such trials, participants of reproductive age must choose between participating in research and having a family. Such decisions carry significant burdens for ADND patients that if left unaddressed could impact patient well-being and the field as whole. We use our perspective as scientists, advocates, and ADND family members to highlight current shortcomings in the field regarding trial participation and family planning issues for ADND patients and call for the establishment of a normative standard to address these concerns. BioMed Central 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8207669/ /pubmed/34130723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02930-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Commentary
Hernandez, Sarah J.
Hohsfield, Lindsay A.
Childbearing vs. clinical trial participation: is it one or the other?
title Childbearing vs. clinical trial participation: is it one or the other?
title_full Childbearing vs. clinical trial participation: is it one or the other?
title_fullStr Childbearing vs. clinical trial participation: is it one or the other?
title_full_unstemmed Childbearing vs. clinical trial participation: is it one or the other?
title_short Childbearing vs. clinical trial participation: is it one or the other?
title_sort childbearing vs. clinical trial participation: is it one or the other?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34130723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02930-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hernandezsarahj childbearingvsclinicaltrialparticipationisitoneortheother
AT hohsfieldlindsaya childbearingvsclinicaltrialparticipationisitoneortheother