Cargando…

Mediastinal effusion due to pericardiocentesis with cardiac tamponade: a case report

BACKGROUND: Pericardiocentesis is an effective treatment for cardiac tamponade, but there are risks, including haemorrhagic events, cardiac perforation, pneumothorax, arrhythmia, acute pulmonary oedema and so on. Mediastinal effusion caused by puncture is rarely reported. CASE PRESENTATION: A 47-yea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Qian, Wang, Difen, Liu, Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34134618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01385-8
_version_ 1783708843499323392
author Zhang, Qian
Wang, Difen
Liu, Ying
author_facet Zhang, Qian
Wang, Difen
Liu, Ying
author_sort Zhang, Qian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pericardiocentesis is an effective treatment for cardiac tamponade, but there are risks, including haemorrhagic events, cardiac perforation, pneumothorax, arrhythmia, acute pulmonary oedema and so on. Mediastinal effusion caused by puncture is rarely reported. CASE PRESENTATION: A 47-year-old man who had a history of right leg deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary artery embolism with implantation of an inferior vena cava filter presented for inferior vena cava filter removal. Within 30 min after the procedure, he developed chest pain, nausea, vomiting and presyncope with shock. Echocardiography confirmed massive pericardial effusion with evidence of cardiac tamponade. Emergency pericardiocentesis was performed. Confusingly, only 3 mL of bloody pericardial effusion was drained in total, and subsequently, the patient’s symptoms rapidly improved with stable haemodynamics. Repeat echocardiography showed that the pericardial effusion had disappeared. Urgent computed tomography pulmonary angiography demonstrated localized effusion, which was not seen the previous computed tomography results and was noted around the left ventricle in the mediastinal apace. No intervention was performed, given that there was no bleeding tendency or further adverse events related to the mediastinal effusion. The patient was subsequently discharged in a stable condition a few days later, and outpatient follow-up was advised. CONCLUSIONS: Mediastinal effusion is a rare complication of pericardiocentesis. In the case described herein, the most likely cause was pericardial effusion extravasated into the mediastinum through the needle insertion site in the puncture process due to large pressure variations in the intrapericardial space with tamponade, differing from cases of over-anticoagulation reported in the previous literature. Just as our case demonstrates that conservative treatment of an hemodynamic insignificant mediastinal effusion may be appropriate. Echocardiography is useful and effective to minimize complication rates. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-021-01385-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8207801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82078012021-06-16 Mediastinal effusion due to pericardiocentesis with cardiac tamponade: a case report Zhang, Qian Wang, Difen Liu, Ying BMC Anesthesiol Case Report BACKGROUND: Pericardiocentesis is an effective treatment for cardiac tamponade, but there are risks, including haemorrhagic events, cardiac perforation, pneumothorax, arrhythmia, acute pulmonary oedema and so on. Mediastinal effusion caused by puncture is rarely reported. CASE PRESENTATION: A 47-year-old man who had a history of right leg deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary artery embolism with implantation of an inferior vena cava filter presented for inferior vena cava filter removal. Within 30 min after the procedure, he developed chest pain, nausea, vomiting and presyncope with shock. Echocardiography confirmed massive pericardial effusion with evidence of cardiac tamponade. Emergency pericardiocentesis was performed. Confusingly, only 3 mL of bloody pericardial effusion was drained in total, and subsequently, the patient’s symptoms rapidly improved with stable haemodynamics. Repeat echocardiography showed that the pericardial effusion had disappeared. Urgent computed tomography pulmonary angiography demonstrated localized effusion, which was not seen the previous computed tomography results and was noted around the left ventricle in the mediastinal apace. No intervention was performed, given that there was no bleeding tendency or further adverse events related to the mediastinal effusion. The patient was subsequently discharged in a stable condition a few days later, and outpatient follow-up was advised. CONCLUSIONS: Mediastinal effusion is a rare complication of pericardiocentesis. In the case described herein, the most likely cause was pericardial effusion extravasated into the mediastinum through the needle insertion site in the puncture process due to large pressure variations in the intrapericardial space with tamponade, differing from cases of over-anticoagulation reported in the previous literature. Just as our case demonstrates that conservative treatment of an hemodynamic insignificant mediastinal effusion may be appropriate. Echocardiography is useful and effective to minimize complication rates. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-021-01385-8. BioMed Central 2021-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8207801/ /pubmed/34134618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01385-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Case Report
Zhang, Qian
Wang, Difen
Liu, Ying
Mediastinal effusion due to pericardiocentesis with cardiac tamponade: a case report
title Mediastinal effusion due to pericardiocentesis with cardiac tamponade: a case report
title_full Mediastinal effusion due to pericardiocentesis with cardiac tamponade: a case report
title_fullStr Mediastinal effusion due to pericardiocentesis with cardiac tamponade: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Mediastinal effusion due to pericardiocentesis with cardiac tamponade: a case report
title_short Mediastinal effusion due to pericardiocentesis with cardiac tamponade: a case report
title_sort mediastinal effusion due to pericardiocentesis with cardiac tamponade: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34134618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01385-8
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangqian mediastinaleffusionduetopericardiocentesiswithcardiactamponadeacasereport
AT wangdifen mediastinaleffusionduetopericardiocentesiswithcardiactamponadeacasereport
AT liuying mediastinaleffusionduetopericardiocentesiswithcardiactamponadeacasereport