Cargando…
Cryptocurrency volatility forecasting: What can we learn from the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak?
This study aims to examine the issue of cryptocurrency volatility modelling and forecasting based on high-frequency data. More specifically, this study assesses whether crisis periods, particularly the coronavirus disease pandemic, influence the dynamic of cryptocurrency volatility. We investigate t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34155418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04116-x |
_version_ | 1783708847366471680 |
---|---|
author | Ftiti, Zied Louhichi, Wael Ben Ameur, Hachmi |
author_facet | Ftiti, Zied Louhichi, Wael Ben Ameur, Hachmi |
author_sort | Ftiti, Zied |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aims to examine the issue of cryptocurrency volatility modelling and forecasting based on high-frequency data. More specifically, this study assesses whether crisis periods, particularly the coronavirus disease pandemic, influence the dynamic of cryptocurrency volatility. We investigate the four main cryptocurrency markets (Bitcoin, Ethereum Classic, Ethereum, and Ripple) from April 2018 to June 2020. The realized volatility measure is computed and decomposed to various components (continuous versus discontinuous, positive and negative semi-variances, and signed jumps). A variety of heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR) models are developed including these components, thereby enabling assessment of different assumptions (including persistence and asymmetric dynamic) of modelling and volatility forecasting based on in-sample and out-of-sample forecasting strategies, respectively. Our results reveal three main findings. First, the extended HAR model that includes the positive and negative jumps appears to be the best model for predicting future volatility for both crisis and non-crisis periods. Second, during the crisis period, only the negative jump component is statistically significant. Third, in terms of volatility forecasting, the results show that the extended HAR model that includes positive and negative semi-variances outperform the other models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8207820 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82078202021-06-17 Cryptocurrency volatility forecasting: What can we learn from the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak? Ftiti, Zied Louhichi, Wael Ben Ameur, Hachmi Ann Oper Res Original Research This study aims to examine the issue of cryptocurrency volatility modelling and forecasting based on high-frequency data. More specifically, this study assesses whether crisis periods, particularly the coronavirus disease pandemic, influence the dynamic of cryptocurrency volatility. We investigate the four main cryptocurrency markets (Bitcoin, Ethereum Classic, Ethereum, and Ripple) from April 2018 to June 2020. The realized volatility measure is computed and decomposed to various components (continuous versus discontinuous, positive and negative semi-variances, and signed jumps). A variety of heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR) models are developed including these components, thereby enabling assessment of different assumptions (including persistence and asymmetric dynamic) of modelling and volatility forecasting based on in-sample and out-of-sample forecasting strategies, respectively. Our results reveal three main findings. First, the extended HAR model that includes the positive and negative jumps appears to be the best model for predicting future volatility for both crisis and non-crisis periods. Second, during the crisis period, only the negative jump component is statistically significant. Third, in terms of volatility forecasting, the results show that the extended HAR model that includes positive and negative semi-variances outperform the other models. Springer US 2021-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8207820/ /pubmed/34155418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04116-x Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Ftiti, Zied Louhichi, Wael Ben Ameur, Hachmi Cryptocurrency volatility forecasting: What can we learn from the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak? |
title | Cryptocurrency volatility forecasting: What can we learn from the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak? |
title_full | Cryptocurrency volatility forecasting: What can we learn from the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak? |
title_fullStr | Cryptocurrency volatility forecasting: What can we learn from the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak? |
title_full_unstemmed | Cryptocurrency volatility forecasting: What can we learn from the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak? |
title_short | Cryptocurrency volatility forecasting: What can we learn from the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak? |
title_sort | cryptocurrency volatility forecasting: what can we learn from the first wave of the covid-19 outbreak? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8207820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34155418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04116-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ftitizied cryptocurrencyvolatilityforecastingwhatcanwelearnfromthefirstwaveofthecovid19outbreak AT louhichiwael cryptocurrencyvolatilityforecastingwhatcanwelearnfromthefirstwaveofthecovid19outbreak AT benameurhachmi cryptocurrencyvolatilityforecastingwhatcanwelearnfromthefirstwaveofthecovid19outbreak |