Cargando…

Incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national UK double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition

BACKGROUND: Comparative effectiveness randomised controlled trials are powerful tools to resolve uncertainties in existing treatments and care processes. We sought parent and patient perspectives on the design of a planned national, double-cluster randomised controlled trial (COLLABORATE) to resolve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lammons, William, Moss, Becky, Battersby, Cheryl, Cornelius, Victoria, Babalis, Daphne, Modi, Neena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8208018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34212120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001112
_version_ 1783708871797243904
author Lammons, William
Moss, Becky
Battersby, Cheryl
Cornelius, Victoria
Babalis, Daphne
Modi, Neena
author_facet Lammons, William
Moss, Becky
Battersby, Cheryl
Cornelius, Victoria
Babalis, Daphne
Modi, Neena
author_sort Lammons, William
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Comparative effectiveness randomised controlled trials are powerful tools to resolve uncertainties in existing treatments and care processes. We sought parent and patient perspectives on the design of a planned national, double-cluster randomised controlled trial (COLLABORATE) to resolve two longstanding uncertainties in preterm nutrition. METHODS: We used qualitative focus groups and interviews with parents, former patients and clinicians. We followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist and conducted framework analysis, a specific methodology within thematic analysis. RESULTS: We identified support for the trial’s methodology and vision, and elicited themes illustrating parents’ emotional needs in relation to clinical research. These were: relieving the pressure on mothers to breastfeed; opt-out consent as reducing parent stress; the desire for research to be a partnership between clinicians, parents and researchers; the value of presenting trial information in a collaborative tone; and in a format that allows assimilation by parents at their own pace. We identified anxiety and cognitive dissonance among some clinicians in which they recognised the uncertainties that justify the trial but felt unable to participate because of their strongly held views. CONCLUSIONS: The early involvement of parents and former patients identified the centrality of parents’ emotional needs in the design of comparative effectiveness research. These insights have been incorporated into trial enrolment processes and information provided to participants. Specific outputs were a two-sided leaflet providing very brief as well as more detailed information, and use of language that parents perceive as inclusive and participatory. Further work is warranted to support clinicians to address personal biases that inhibit trial participation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8208018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82080182021-06-30 Incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national UK double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition Lammons, William Moss, Becky Battersby, Cheryl Cornelius, Victoria Babalis, Daphne Modi, Neena BMJ Paediatr Open Neonatology BACKGROUND: Comparative effectiveness randomised controlled trials are powerful tools to resolve uncertainties in existing treatments and care processes. We sought parent and patient perspectives on the design of a planned national, double-cluster randomised controlled trial (COLLABORATE) to resolve two longstanding uncertainties in preterm nutrition. METHODS: We used qualitative focus groups and interviews with parents, former patients and clinicians. We followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist and conducted framework analysis, a specific methodology within thematic analysis. RESULTS: We identified support for the trial’s methodology and vision, and elicited themes illustrating parents’ emotional needs in relation to clinical research. These were: relieving the pressure on mothers to breastfeed; opt-out consent as reducing parent stress; the desire for research to be a partnership between clinicians, parents and researchers; the value of presenting trial information in a collaborative tone; and in a format that allows assimilation by parents at their own pace. We identified anxiety and cognitive dissonance among some clinicians in which they recognised the uncertainties that justify the trial but felt unable to participate because of their strongly held views. CONCLUSIONS: The early involvement of parents and former patients identified the centrality of parents’ emotional needs in the design of comparative effectiveness research. These insights have been incorporated into trial enrolment processes and information provided to participants. Specific outputs were a two-sided leaflet providing very brief as well as more detailed information, and use of language that parents perceive as inclusive and participatory. Further work is warranted to support clinicians to address personal biases that inhibit trial participation. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8208018/ /pubmed/34212120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001112 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Neonatology
Lammons, William
Moss, Becky
Battersby, Cheryl
Cornelius, Victoria
Babalis, Daphne
Modi, Neena
Incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national UK double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition
title Incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national UK double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition
title_full Incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national UK double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition
title_fullStr Incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national UK double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national UK double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition
title_short Incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national UK double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition
title_sort incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national uk double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition
topic Neonatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8208018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34212120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001112
work_keys_str_mv AT lammonswilliam incorporatingparentformerpatientandclinicianperspectivesinthedesignofanationalukdoubleclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaddressinguncertaintiesinpretermnutrition
AT mossbecky incorporatingparentformerpatientandclinicianperspectivesinthedesignofanationalukdoubleclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaddressinguncertaintiesinpretermnutrition
AT battersbycheryl incorporatingparentformerpatientandclinicianperspectivesinthedesignofanationalukdoubleclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaddressinguncertaintiesinpretermnutrition
AT corneliusvictoria incorporatingparentformerpatientandclinicianperspectivesinthedesignofanationalukdoubleclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaddressinguncertaintiesinpretermnutrition
AT babalisdaphne incorporatingparentformerpatientandclinicianperspectivesinthedesignofanationalukdoubleclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaddressinguncertaintiesinpretermnutrition
AT modineena incorporatingparentformerpatientandclinicianperspectivesinthedesignofanationalukdoubleclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaddressinguncertaintiesinpretermnutrition