Cargando…
Incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national UK double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition
BACKGROUND: Comparative effectiveness randomised controlled trials are powerful tools to resolve uncertainties in existing treatments and care processes. We sought parent and patient perspectives on the design of a planned national, double-cluster randomised controlled trial (COLLABORATE) to resolve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8208018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34212120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001112 |
_version_ | 1783708871797243904 |
---|---|
author | Lammons, William Moss, Becky Battersby, Cheryl Cornelius, Victoria Babalis, Daphne Modi, Neena |
author_facet | Lammons, William Moss, Becky Battersby, Cheryl Cornelius, Victoria Babalis, Daphne Modi, Neena |
author_sort | Lammons, William |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Comparative effectiveness randomised controlled trials are powerful tools to resolve uncertainties in existing treatments and care processes. We sought parent and patient perspectives on the design of a planned national, double-cluster randomised controlled trial (COLLABORATE) to resolve two longstanding uncertainties in preterm nutrition. METHODS: We used qualitative focus groups and interviews with parents, former patients and clinicians. We followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist and conducted framework analysis, a specific methodology within thematic analysis. RESULTS: We identified support for the trial’s methodology and vision, and elicited themes illustrating parents’ emotional needs in relation to clinical research. These were: relieving the pressure on mothers to breastfeed; opt-out consent as reducing parent stress; the desire for research to be a partnership between clinicians, parents and researchers; the value of presenting trial information in a collaborative tone; and in a format that allows assimilation by parents at their own pace. We identified anxiety and cognitive dissonance among some clinicians in which they recognised the uncertainties that justify the trial but felt unable to participate because of their strongly held views. CONCLUSIONS: The early involvement of parents and former patients identified the centrality of parents’ emotional needs in the design of comparative effectiveness research. These insights have been incorporated into trial enrolment processes and information provided to participants. Specific outputs were a two-sided leaflet providing very brief as well as more detailed information, and use of language that parents perceive as inclusive and participatory. Further work is warranted to support clinicians to address personal biases that inhibit trial participation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8208018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82080182021-06-30 Incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national UK double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition Lammons, William Moss, Becky Battersby, Cheryl Cornelius, Victoria Babalis, Daphne Modi, Neena BMJ Paediatr Open Neonatology BACKGROUND: Comparative effectiveness randomised controlled trials are powerful tools to resolve uncertainties in existing treatments and care processes. We sought parent and patient perspectives on the design of a planned national, double-cluster randomised controlled trial (COLLABORATE) to resolve two longstanding uncertainties in preterm nutrition. METHODS: We used qualitative focus groups and interviews with parents, former patients and clinicians. We followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist and conducted framework analysis, a specific methodology within thematic analysis. RESULTS: We identified support for the trial’s methodology and vision, and elicited themes illustrating parents’ emotional needs in relation to clinical research. These were: relieving the pressure on mothers to breastfeed; opt-out consent as reducing parent stress; the desire for research to be a partnership between clinicians, parents and researchers; the value of presenting trial information in a collaborative tone; and in a format that allows assimilation by parents at their own pace. We identified anxiety and cognitive dissonance among some clinicians in which they recognised the uncertainties that justify the trial but felt unable to participate because of their strongly held views. CONCLUSIONS: The early involvement of parents and former patients identified the centrality of parents’ emotional needs in the design of comparative effectiveness research. These insights have been incorporated into trial enrolment processes and information provided to participants. Specific outputs were a two-sided leaflet providing very brief as well as more detailed information, and use of language that parents perceive as inclusive and participatory. Further work is warranted to support clinicians to address personal biases that inhibit trial participation. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8208018/ /pubmed/34212120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001112 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Neonatology Lammons, William Moss, Becky Battersby, Cheryl Cornelius, Victoria Babalis, Daphne Modi, Neena Incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national UK double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition |
title | Incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national UK double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition |
title_full | Incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national UK double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition |
title_fullStr | Incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national UK double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition |
title_full_unstemmed | Incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national UK double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition |
title_short | Incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national UK double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition |
title_sort | incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national uk double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition |
topic | Neonatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8208018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34212120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001112 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lammonswilliam incorporatingparentformerpatientandclinicianperspectivesinthedesignofanationalukdoubleclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaddressinguncertaintiesinpretermnutrition AT mossbecky incorporatingparentformerpatientandclinicianperspectivesinthedesignofanationalukdoubleclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaddressinguncertaintiesinpretermnutrition AT battersbycheryl incorporatingparentformerpatientandclinicianperspectivesinthedesignofanationalukdoubleclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaddressinguncertaintiesinpretermnutrition AT corneliusvictoria incorporatingparentformerpatientandclinicianperspectivesinthedesignofanationalukdoubleclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaddressinguncertaintiesinpretermnutrition AT babalisdaphne incorporatingparentformerpatientandclinicianperspectivesinthedesignofanationalukdoubleclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaddressinguncertaintiesinpretermnutrition AT modineena incorporatingparentformerpatientandclinicianperspectivesinthedesignofanationalukdoubleclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialaddressinguncertaintiesinpretermnutrition |