Cargando…
Effectiveness of different facemask materials to combat transmission of airborne diseases
The pandemic COVID-19, caused by SARS-COV-2 virus has shaken the entire world with no such remedy till date. The only possible way to stop transmission of SARS-COV-2 is to take safety precautions including use of facemask. With the ever-increasing concern on the disease, it is necessary to choose fa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer India
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8208061/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01634-z |
_version_ | 1783708880568582144 |
---|---|
author | Prudhvi Krishna, M Babalola, Simeon A Dutta, Samik Chakraborty, Shitanshu Shekhar Thangadurai, Murugan Roy, Himadri Mandal, Nilrudra Hirani, Harish Roy, Poulomi |
author_facet | Prudhvi Krishna, M Babalola, Simeon A Dutta, Samik Chakraborty, Shitanshu Shekhar Thangadurai, Murugan Roy, Himadri Mandal, Nilrudra Hirani, Harish Roy, Poulomi |
author_sort | Prudhvi Krishna, M |
collection | PubMed |
description | The pandemic COVID-19, caused by SARS-COV-2 virus has shaken the entire world with no such remedy till date. The only possible way to stop transmission of SARS-COV-2 is to take safety precautions including use of facemask. With the ever-increasing concern on the disease, it is necessary to choose facemask components to achieve the performance as good as commercially available N95 masks in a cost-effective way. This investigation compares the effectiveness of five different 3-layered masks with N95 mask in terms of pressure drop and aerosol filtration capabilities. Different combinations of cotton, polypropylene fabric, tissue and high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) were used as mask materials. In comparison to N95 mask, the result shows that the 3-layered cotton mask has much lesser pressure drop but least droplet filtration efficiency, while polypropylene-HEPA-polypropylene mask is seen as the best cost-effective alternative to N95 in terms of droplets filtration efficiency and breathability. These findings are crucial to make the right non-medical facemask to combat COVID-19 and other airborne diseases. [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8208061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer India |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82080612021-06-17 Effectiveness of different facemask materials to combat transmission of airborne diseases Prudhvi Krishna, M Babalola, Simeon A Dutta, Samik Chakraborty, Shitanshu Shekhar Thangadurai, Murugan Roy, Himadri Mandal, Nilrudra Hirani, Harish Roy, Poulomi Sādhanā Article The pandemic COVID-19, caused by SARS-COV-2 virus has shaken the entire world with no such remedy till date. The only possible way to stop transmission of SARS-COV-2 is to take safety precautions including use of facemask. With the ever-increasing concern on the disease, it is necessary to choose facemask components to achieve the performance as good as commercially available N95 masks in a cost-effective way. This investigation compares the effectiveness of five different 3-layered masks with N95 mask in terms of pressure drop and aerosol filtration capabilities. Different combinations of cotton, polypropylene fabric, tissue and high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) were used as mask materials. In comparison to N95 mask, the result shows that the 3-layered cotton mask has much lesser pressure drop but least droplet filtration efficiency, while polypropylene-HEPA-polypropylene mask is seen as the best cost-effective alternative to N95 in terms of droplets filtration efficiency and breathability. These findings are crucial to make the right non-medical facemask to combat COVID-19 and other airborne diseases. [Image: see text] Springer India 2021-06-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8208061/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01634-z Text en © Indian Academy of Sciences 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Prudhvi Krishna, M Babalola, Simeon A Dutta, Samik Chakraborty, Shitanshu Shekhar Thangadurai, Murugan Roy, Himadri Mandal, Nilrudra Hirani, Harish Roy, Poulomi Effectiveness of different facemask materials to combat transmission of airborne diseases |
title | Effectiveness of different facemask materials to combat transmission of airborne diseases |
title_full | Effectiveness of different facemask materials to combat transmission of airborne diseases |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of different facemask materials to combat transmission of airborne diseases |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of different facemask materials to combat transmission of airborne diseases |
title_short | Effectiveness of different facemask materials to combat transmission of airborne diseases |
title_sort | effectiveness of different facemask materials to combat transmission of airborne diseases |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8208061/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01634-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prudhvikrishnam effectivenessofdifferentfacemaskmaterialstocombattransmissionofairbornediseases AT babalolasimeona effectivenessofdifferentfacemaskmaterialstocombattransmissionofairbornediseases AT duttasamik effectivenessofdifferentfacemaskmaterialstocombattransmissionofairbornediseases AT chakrabortyshitanshushekhar effectivenessofdifferentfacemaskmaterialstocombattransmissionofairbornediseases AT thangaduraimurugan effectivenessofdifferentfacemaskmaterialstocombattransmissionofairbornediseases AT royhimadri effectivenessofdifferentfacemaskmaterialstocombattransmissionofairbornediseases AT mandalnilrudra effectivenessofdifferentfacemaskmaterialstocombattransmissionofairbornediseases AT hiraniharish effectivenessofdifferentfacemaskmaterialstocombattransmissionofairbornediseases AT roypoulomi effectivenessofdifferentfacemaskmaterialstocombattransmissionofairbornediseases |