Cargando…

Letter to the editor: “Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology”

Artificial intelligence algorithms are booming in medicine, and the question of biases induced or perpetuated by these tools is a very important topic. There is a greater risk of these biases in radiology, which is now the primary diagnostic tool in modern treatment. Some authors have recently propo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iannessi, Antoine, Beaumont, Hubert, Bertrand, Anne Sophie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8208365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34132919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01022-5
_version_ 1783708929424883712
author Iannessi, Antoine
Beaumont, Hubert
Bertrand, Anne Sophie
author_facet Iannessi, Antoine
Beaumont, Hubert
Bertrand, Anne Sophie
author_sort Iannessi, Antoine
collection PubMed
description Artificial intelligence algorithms are booming in medicine, and the question of biases induced or perpetuated by these tools is a very important topic. There is a greater risk of these biases in radiology, which is now the primary diagnostic tool in modern treatment. Some authors have recently proposed an analysis framework for social inequalities and the biases at risk of being introduced into future algorithms. In our paper, we comment on the different strategies for resolving these biases. We warn that there is an even greater risk in mixing the notion of equity, the definition of which is socio-political, into the design stages of these algorithms. We believe that rather than being beneficial, this could in fact harm the main purpose of these artificial intelligence tools, which is the care of the patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8208365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82083652021-07-01 Letter to the editor: “Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology” Iannessi, Antoine Beaumont, Hubert Bertrand, Anne Sophie Insights Imaging Opinion Artificial intelligence algorithms are booming in medicine, and the question of biases induced or perpetuated by these tools is a very important topic. There is a greater risk of these biases in radiology, which is now the primary diagnostic tool in modern treatment. Some authors have recently proposed an analysis framework for social inequalities and the biases at risk of being introduced into future algorithms. In our paper, we comment on the different strategies for resolving these biases. We warn that there is an even greater risk in mixing the notion of equity, the definition of which is socio-political, into the design stages of these algorithms. We believe that rather than being beneficial, this could in fact harm the main purpose of these artificial intelligence tools, which is the care of the patient. Springer International Publishing 2021-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8208365/ /pubmed/34132919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01022-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Opinion
Iannessi, Antoine
Beaumont, Hubert
Bertrand, Anne Sophie
Letter to the editor: “Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology”
title Letter to the editor: “Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology”
title_full Letter to the editor: “Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology”
title_fullStr Letter to the editor: “Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology”
title_full_unstemmed Letter to the editor: “Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology”
title_short Letter to the editor: “Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology”
title_sort letter to the editor: “not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology”
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8208365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34132919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01022-5
work_keys_str_mv AT iannessiantoine lettertotheeditornotallbiasesarebadequitableandinequitablebiasesinmachinelearningandradiology
AT beaumonthubert lettertotheeditornotallbiasesarebadequitableandinequitablebiasesinmachinelearningandradiology
AT bertrandannesophie lettertotheeditornotallbiasesarebadequitableandinequitablebiasesinmachinelearningandradiology