Cargando…
Letter to the editor: “Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology”
Artificial intelligence algorithms are booming in medicine, and the question of biases induced or perpetuated by these tools is a very important topic. There is a greater risk of these biases in radiology, which is now the primary diagnostic tool in modern treatment. Some authors have recently propo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8208365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34132919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01022-5 |
_version_ | 1783708929424883712 |
---|---|
author | Iannessi, Antoine Beaumont, Hubert Bertrand, Anne Sophie |
author_facet | Iannessi, Antoine Beaumont, Hubert Bertrand, Anne Sophie |
author_sort | Iannessi, Antoine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Artificial intelligence algorithms are booming in medicine, and the question of biases induced or perpetuated by these tools is a very important topic. There is a greater risk of these biases in radiology, which is now the primary diagnostic tool in modern treatment. Some authors have recently proposed an analysis framework for social inequalities and the biases at risk of being introduced into future algorithms. In our paper, we comment on the different strategies for resolving these biases. We warn that there is an even greater risk in mixing the notion of equity, the definition of which is socio-political, into the design stages of these algorithms. We believe that rather than being beneficial, this could in fact harm the main purpose of these artificial intelligence tools, which is the care of the patient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8208365 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82083652021-07-01 Letter to the editor: “Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology” Iannessi, Antoine Beaumont, Hubert Bertrand, Anne Sophie Insights Imaging Opinion Artificial intelligence algorithms are booming in medicine, and the question of biases induced or perpetuated by these tools is a very important topic. There is a greater risk of these biases in radiology, which is now the primary diagnostic tool in modern treatment. Some authors have recently proposed an analysis framework for social inequalities and the biases at risk of being introduced into future algorithms. In our paper, we comment on the different strategies for resolving these biases. We warn that there is an even greater risk in mixing the notion of equity, the definition of which is socio-political, into the design stages of these algorithms. We believe that rather than being beneficial, this could in fact harm the main purpose of these artificial intelligence tools, which is the care of the patient. Springer International Publishing 2021-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8208365/ /pubmed/34132919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01022-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Opinion Iannessi, Antoine Beaumont, Hubert Bertrand, Anne Sophie Letter to the editor: “Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology” |
title | Letter to the editor: “Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology” |
title_full | Letter to the editor: “Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology” |
title_fullStr | Letter to the editor: “Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology” |
title_full_unstemmed | Letter to the editor: “Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology” |
title_short | Letter to the editor: “Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology” |
title_sort | letter to the editor: “not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology” |
topic | Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8208365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34132919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01022-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iannessiantoine lettertotheeditornotallbiasesarebadequitableandinequitablebiasesinmachinelearningandradiology AT beaumonthubert lettertotheeditornotallbiasesarebadequitableandinequitablebiasesinmachinelearningandradiology AT bertrandannesophie lettertotheeditornotallbiasesarebadequitableandinequitablebiasesinmachinelearningandradiology |