Cargando…
Counting publications and citations is not just irrelevant: it is an incentive that subverts the impact of clinical research
Autores principales: | Büttner, Fionn, Ardern, Clare L, Blazey, Paul, Dastouri, Serenna, McKay, Heather A, Moher, David, Khan, Karim M |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8208942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33361277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-103146 |
Ejemplares similares
-
“It's Not Just in My Head, and It's Not Just Irrelevant”: Autistic Negotiations of Menopausal Transitions
por: Karavidas, Marianna, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Task-irrelevant spatial dividers facilitate counting and numerosity estimation
por: Li, Qi, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Important citation identification by exploiting content and section-wise in-text citation count
por: Nazir, Shahzad, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare “like with like”!
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Is Task-Irrelevant Learning Really Task-Irrelevant?
por: Seitz, Aaron R., et al.
Publicado: (2008)