Cargando…
Impact of tumor growth rate during preceding treatment on tumor response to nivolumab or irinotecan in advanced gastric cancer
BACKGROUND: Nivolumab (NIVO) and irinotecan (IRI) are standard treatments for refractory advanced gastric cancer (AGC); however, it is unclear which drug should be administered first or in which cases. The tumor growth rate (TGR) during preceding treatment is reported to be associated with tumor res...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34119801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100179 |
_version_ | 1783709057187577856 |
---|---|
author | Kato, K. Masuishi, T. Fushiki, K. Nakano, S. Kawamoto, Y. Narita, Y. Tsushima, T. Harada, K. Kadowaki, S. Todaka, A. Yuki, S. Tajika, M. Machida, N. Komatsu, Y. Yasui, H. Muro, K. Kawakami, T. |
author_facet | Kato, K. Masuishi, T. Fushiki, K. Nakano, S. Kawamoto, Y. Narita, Y. Tsushima, T. Harada, K. Kadowaki, S. Todaka, A. Yuki, S. Tajika, M. Machida, N. Komatsu, Y. Yasui, H. Muro, K. Kawakami, T. |
author_sort | Kato, K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nivolumab (NIVO) and irinotecan (IRI) are standard treatments for refractory advanced gastric cancer (AGC); however, it is unclear which drug should be administered first or in which cases. The tumor growth rate (TGR) during preceding treatment is reported to be associated with tumor response in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil, suggesting that TGR may be useful for drug selection. Therefore, we evaluated the association between TGR during preceding treatment and the tumor response to NIVO or IRI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive AGC patients treated with NIVO or IRI and divided them into slow-growing (Slow) and rapid-growing (Rapid) groups according to TGR and the presence or absence of new lesions (NL+/NL−, respectively) during preceding treatment (Slow group: NL− with low TGR <0.30%/day; Rapid group: NL+ or high TGR ≥0.30%/day). RESULTS: A total of 117 patients (Rapid/Slow groups, 72/45; NIVO/IRI groups, 32/85) were eligible. All baseline characteristics except peritoneal metastases were similar between patients treated with NIVO and IRI in the Rapid and Slow groups. The response rate was significantly higher in patients treated with NIVO compared with IRI [31%/3%; odds ratio (OR), 13.8; P = 0.01; adjusted OR, 52; P = 0.002] in the Slow group, but there was no difference between patients treated with NIVO and IRI (5%/8%; OR, 0.68; P = 0.73; adjusted OR, 0.94; P = 0.96) in the Rapid group. Disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were consistent with these results. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that NIVO treatment is a more favorable option for patients with slow-growing tumors, and NIVO and IRI are similarly recommended for patients with rapid-growing tumors in refractory AGC. TGR and NL emergence during preceding treatment may be helpful for drug selection and warrant further investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8209093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82090932021-06-23 Impact of tumor growth rate during preceding treatment on tumor response to nivolumab or irinotecan in advanced gastric cancer Kato, K. Masuishi, T. Fushiki, K. Nakano, S. Kawamoto, Y. Narita, Y. Tsushima, T. Harada, K. Kadowaki, S. Todaka, A. Yuki, S. Tajika, M. Machida, N. Komatsu, Y. Yasui, H. Muro, K. Kawakami, T. ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: Nivolumab (NIVO) and irinotecan (IRI) are standard treatments for refractory advanced gastric cancer (AGC); however, it is unclear which drug should be administered first or in which cases. The tumor growth rate (TGR) during preceding treatment is reported to be associated with tumor response in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil, suggesting that TGR may be useful for drug selection. Therefore, we evaluated the association between TGR during preceding treatment and the tumor response to NIVO or IRI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive AGC patients treated with NIVO or IRI and divided them into slow-growing (Slow) and rapid-growing (Rapid) groups according to TGR and the presence or absence of new lesions (NL+/NL−, respectively) during preceding treatment (Slow group: NL− with low TGR <0.30%/day; Rapid group: NL+ or high TGR ≥0.30%/day). RESULTS: A total of 117 patients (Rapid/Slow groups, 72/45; NIVO/IRI groups, 32/85) were eligible. All baseline characteristics except peritoneal metastases were similar between patients treated with NIVO and IRI in the Rapid and Slow groups. The response rate was significantly higher in patients treated with NIVO compared with IRI [31%/3%; odds ratio (OR), 13.8; P = 0.01; adjusted OR, 52; P = 0.002] in the Slow group, but there was no difference between patients treated with NIVO and IRI (5%/8%; OR, 0.68; P = 0.73; adjusted OR, 0.94; P = 0.96) in the Rapid group. Disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were consistent with these results. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that NIVO treatment is a more favorable option for patients with slow-growing tumors, and NIVO and IRI are similarly recommended for patients with rapid-growing tumors in refractory AGC. TGR and NL emergence during preceding treatment may be helpful for drug selection and warrant further investigation. Elsevier 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8209093/ /pubmed/34119801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100179 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society for Medical Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kato, K. Masuishi, T. Fushiki, K. Nakano, S. Kawamoto, Y. Narita, Y. Tsushima, T. Harada, K. Kadowaki, S. Todaka, A. Yuki, S. Tajika, M. Machida, N. Komatsu, Y. Yasui, H. Muro, K. Kawakami, T. Impact of tumor growth rate during preceding treatment on tumor response to nivolumab or irinotecan in advanced gastric cancer |
title | Impact of tumor growth rate during preceding treatment on tumor response to nivolumab or irinotecan in advanced gastric cancer |
title_full | Impact of tumor growth rate during preceding treatment on tumor response to nivolumab or irinotecan in advanced gastric cancer |
title_fullStr | Impact of tumor growth rate during preceding treatment on tumor response to nivolumab or irinotecan in advanced gastric cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of tumor growth rate during preceding treatment on tumor response to nivolumab or irinotecan in advanced gastric cancer |
title_short | Impact of tumor growth rate during preceding treatment on tumor response to nivolumab or irinotecan in advanced gastric cancer |
title_sort | impact of tumor growth rate during preceding treatment on tumor response to nivolumab or irinotecan in advanced gastric cancer |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34119801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100179 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katok impactoftumorgrowthrateduringprecedingtreatmentontumorresponsetonivolumaboririnotecaninadvancedgastriccancer AT masuishit impactoftumorgrowthrateduringprecedingtreatmentontumorresponsetonivolumaboririnotecaninadvancedgastriccancer AT fushikik impactoftumorgrowthrateduringprecedingtreatmentontumorresponsetonivolumaboririnotecaninadvancedgastriccancer AT nakanos impactoftumorgrowthrateduringprecedingtreatmentontumorresponsetonivolumaboririnotecaninadvancedgastriccancer AT kawamotoy impactoftumorgrowthrateduringprecedingtreatmentontumorresponsetonivolumaboririnotecaninadvancedgastriccancer AT naritay impactoftumorgrowthrateduringprecedingtreatmentontumorresponsetonivolumaboririnotecaninadvancedgastriccancer AT tsushimat impactoftumorgrowthrateduringprecedingtreatmentontumorresponsetonivolumaboririnotecaninadvancedgastriccancer AT haradak impactoftumorgrowthrateduringprecedingtreatmentontumorresponsetonivolumaboririnotecaninadvancedgastriccancer AT kadowakis impactoftumorgrowthrateduringprecedingtreatmentontumorresponsetonivolumaboririnotecaninadvancedgastriccancer AT todakaa impactoftumorgrowthrateduringprecedingtreatmentontumorresponsetonivolumaboririnotecaninadvancedgastriccancer AT yukis impactoftumorgrowthrateduringprecedingtreatmentontumorresponsetonivolumaboririnotecaninadvancedgastriccancer AT tajikam impactoftumorgrowthrateduringprecedingtreatmentontumorresponsetonivolumaboririnotecaninadvancedgastriccancer AT machidan impactoftumorgrowthrateduringprecedingtreatmentontumorresponsetonivolumaboririnotecaninadvancedgastriccancer AT komatsuy impactoftumorgrowthrateduringprecedingtreatmentontumorresponsetonivolumaboririnotecaninadvancedgastriccancer AT yasuih impactoftumorgrowthrateduringprecedingtreatmentontumorresponsetonivolumaboririnotecaninadvancedgastriccancer AT murok impactoftumorgrowthrateduringprecedingtreatmentontumorresponsetonivolumaboririnotecaninadvancedgastriccancer AT kawakamit impactoftumorgrowthrateduringprecedingtreatmentontumorresponsetonivolumaboririnotecaninadvancedgastriccancer |