Cargando…

Iatrogenic perforation of a pulmonary artery side branch—a case report

BACKGROUND: The use of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) continues to be important for the diagnosis and therapeutic control of severe heart failure and in the diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension. One of the most feared complications of this examination is perforation of a pulmonary artery...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leick, Juergen, Leinen, Stefan, Friedrich, Ivar, Werner, Nikos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34151140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytab199
_version_ 1783709112817680384
author Leick, Juergen
Leinen, Stefan
Friedrich, Ivar
Werner, Nikos
author_facet Leick, Juergen
Leinen, Stefan
Friedrich, Ivar
Werner, Nikos
author_sort Leick, Juergen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) continues to be important for the diagnosis and therapeutic control of severe heart failure and in the diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension. One of the most feared complications of this examination is perforation of a pulmonary artery with an estimated incidence of 0.031–0.05% and mortality rates of up to 70%. CASE SUMMARY: We report on an 80-year-old female patient who experienced a perforation of a pulmonary artery branch during the work-up of pulmonary arterial hypertension by PAC. Immediately after the perforation, haemodynamic shock developed rapidly, necessitating cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Occlusion of the pulmonary artery branch with a semicompliant balloon was applied immediately. After 40 min of occlusion, the bleeding persisted, and endovascular coil implantation was performed. Subsequently, the bleeding stopped, and the haemodynamics stabilized. After treatment, the patient was discharged home without any significant sequelae. DISCUSSION: Treatment options in pulmonary artery perforation are limited, especially if the patient is inoperable and if balloon occlusion fails. Based on our results, endovascular coil embolization can be considered a therapeutic option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8209363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82093632021-06-17 Iatrogenic perforation of a pulmonary artery side branch—a case report Leick, Juergen Leinen, Stefan Friedrich, Ivar Werner, Nikos Eur Heart J Case Rep Competition Winner BACKGROUND: The use of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) continues to be important for the diagnosis and therapeutic control of severe heart failure and in the diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension. One of the most feared complications of this examination is perforation of a pulmonary artery with an estimated incidence of 0.031–0.05% and mortality rates of up to 70%. CASE SUMMARY: We report on an 80-year-old female patient who experienced a perforation of a pulmonary artery branch during the work-up of pulmonary arterial hypertension by PAC. Immediately after the perforation, haemodynamic shock developed rapidly, necessitating cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Occlusion of the pulmonary artery branch with a semicompliant balloon was applied immediately. After 40 min of occlusion, the bleeding persisted, and endovascular coil implantation was performed. Subsequently, the bleeding stopped, and the haemodynamics stabilized. After treatment, the patient was discharged home without any significant sequelae. DISCUSSION: Treatment options in pulmonary artery perforation are limited, especially if the patient is inoperable and if balloon occlusion fails. Based on our results, endovascular coil embolization can be considered a therapeutic option. Oxford University Press 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8209363/ /pubmed/34151140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytab199 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Competition Winner
Leick, Juergen
Leinen, Stefan
Friedrich, Ivar
Werner, Nikos
Iatrogenic perforation of a pulmonary artery side branch—a case report
title Iatrogenic perforation of a pulmonary artery side branch—a case report
title_full Iatrogenic perforation of a pulmonary artery side branch—a case report
title_fullStr Iatrogenic perforation of a pulmonary artery side branch—a case report
title_full_unstemmed Iatrogenic perforation of a pulmonary artery side branch—a case report
title_short Iatrogenic perforation of a pulmonary artery side branch—a case report
title_sort iatrogenic perforation of a pulmonary artery side branch—a case report
topic Competition Winner
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34151140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytab199
work_keys_str_mv AT leickjuergen iatrogenicperforationofapulmonaryarterysidebranchacasereport
AT leinenstefan iatrogenicperforationofapulmonaryarterysidebranchacasereport
AT friedrichivar iatrogenicperforationofapulmonaryarterysidebranchacasereport
AT wernernikos iatrogenicperforationofapulmonaryarterysidebranchacasereport