Cargando…

Impact of STEMI Diagnosis and Catheterization Laboratory Activation Systems on Sex- and Age-Based Differences in Treatment Delay

BACKGROUND: Women and the elderly with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) experience longer treatment delays despite prehospital STEMI diagnosis and catheterization laboratory activation systems. It is not known what role specific STEMI referral systems might play in mediating this gap in ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pacheco, Christine, Boivin-Proulx, Laurie-Anne, Bastiany, Alexandra, Matteau, Alexis, Mansour, Samer, Gobeil, François, Simion, Oana-Maria, Kokis, André, Bairey Merz, C. Noel, Potter, Brian J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2021.01.009
_version_ 1783709120029786112
author Pacheco, Christine
Boivin-Proulx, Laurie-Anne
Bastiany, Alexandra
Matteau, Alexis
Mansour, Samer
Gobeil, François
Simion, Oana-Maria
Kokis, André
Bairey Merz, C. Noel
Potter, Brian J.
author_facet Pacheco, Christine
Boivin-Proulx, Laurie-Anne
Bastiany, Alexandra
Matteau, Alexis
Mansour, Samer
Gobeil, François
Simion, Oana-Maria
Kokis, André
Bairey Merz, C. Noel
Potter, Brian J.
author_sort Pacheco, Christine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women and the elderly with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) experience longer treatment delays despite prehospital STEMI diagnosis and catheterization laboratory activation systems. It is not known what role specific STEMI referral systems might play in mediating this gap in care. We therefore examined sex- and age-based differences in STEMI treatment delay (TD) in different STEMI activation systems. METHODS: This observational comparative effectiveness study comprised 3 retrospective STEMI cohorts: a traditional hospital-based activation cohort (Cohort 1), an automated “physician-blind” prehospital activation cohort (Cohort 2), and a prehospital activation with real-time physician oversight cohort (Cohort 3). Outcomes of interest included sex and age group (< or ≥ 75 years) differences in suboptimal (> 90 minutes) first medical contact-to-device time (FMC-to-device) within each cohort, as well as independent predictors of suboptimal FMC-to-device and in-hospital mortality across cohorts. RESULTS: Five hundred-sixty STEMI activations were analyzed. In Cohort 1 (n = 179), women and those ≥ 75 were more likely to experience suboptimal FMC-to-device times (78.7% vs 36.4%, P = 0.02 and 85.0% vs 58.3%, < 0.01, respectively). Similar findings were observed in Cohort 3 (n = 109) (53.5% vs 32.9%, 56.5% vs 33.3%, respectively; P = 0.05, for both). In Cohort 2 (n = 272), however, there was no significant age-based difference (30.4% vs 21.7%, P = 0.18), and the gap was numerically lower but still significant for women (32.1% vs 20.1%, P = 0.04). When examining prehospital activation cohorts only, female sex (P = 0.03), off-hours presentation (P < 0.01), and physician oversight (P < 0.01) were independent predictors of longer FMC-to-device times. Age ≥ 75 (P < 0.01), Killip class (P < 0.01), and female sex (P = 0.04) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Automated “physician-blind” STEMI activation was associated with a reduced TD gap in women and the elderly, suggesting possible systemic bias. Appropriately powered confirmatory studies are required, but incorporating automated diagnosis and catheterization laboratory activation may be a solution to treatment gaps in STEMI care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8209393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82093932021-06-23 Impact of STEMI Diagnosis and Catheterization Laboratory Activation Systems on Sex- and Age-Based Differences in Treatment Delay Pacheco, Christine Boivin-Proulx, Laurie-Anne Bastiany, Alexandra Matteau, Alexis Mansour, Samer Gobeil, François Simion, Oana-Maria Kokis, André Bairey Merz, C. Noel Potter, Brian J. CJC Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Women and the elderly with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) experience longer treatment delays despite prehospital STEMI diagnosis and catheterization laboratory activation systems. It is not known what role specific STEMI referral systems might play in mediating this gap in care. We therefore examined sex- and age-based differences in STEMI treatment delay (TD) in different STEMI activation systems. METHODS: This observational comparative effectiveness study comprised 3 retrospective STEMI cohorts: a traditional hospital-based activation cohort (Cohort 1), an automated “physician-blind” prehospital activation cohort (Cohort 2), and a prehospital activation with real-time physician oversight cohort (Cohort 3). Outcomes of interest included sex and age group (< or ≥ 75 years) differences in suboptimal (> 90 minutes) first medical contact-to-device time (FMC-to-device) within each cohort, as well as independent predictors of suboptimal FMC-to-device and in-hospital mortality across cohorts. RESULTS: Five hundred-sixty STEMI activations were analyzed. In Cohort 1 (n = 179), women and those ≥ 75 were more likely to experience suboptimal FMC-to-device times (78.7% vs 36.4%, P = 0.02 and 85.0% vs 58.3%, < 0.01, respectively). Similar findings were observed in Cohort 3 (n = 109) (53.5% vs 32.9%, 56.5% vs 33.3%, respectively; P = 0.05, for both). In Cohort 2 (n = 272), however, there was no significant age-based difference (30.4% vs 21.7%, P = 0.18), and the gap was numerically lower but still significant for women (32.1% vs 20.1%, P = 0.04). When examining prehospital activation cohorts only, female sex (P = 0.03), off-hours presentation (P < 0.01), and physician oversight (P < 0.01) were independent predictors of longer FMC-to-device times. Age ≥ 75 (P < 0.01), Killip class (P < 0.01), and female sex (P = 0.04) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Automated “physician-blind” STEMI activation was associated with a reduced TD gap in women and the elderly, suggesting possible systemic bias. Appropriately powered confirmatory studies are required, but incorporating automated diagnosis and catheterization laboratory activation may be a solution to treatment gaps in STEMI care. Elsevier 2021-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8209393/ /pubmed/34169251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2021.01.009 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Pacheco, Christine
Boivin-Proulx, Laurie-Anne
Bastiany, Alexandra
Matteau, Alexis
Mansour, Samer
Gobeil, François
Simion, Oana-Maria
Kokis, André
Bairey Merz, C. Noel
Potter, Brian J.
Impact of STEMI Diagnosis and Catheterization Laboratory Activation Systems on Sex- and Age-Based Differences in Treatment Delay
title Impact of STEMI Diagnosis and Catheterization Laboratory Activation Systems on Sex- and Age-Based Differences in Treatment Delay
title_full Impact of STEMI Diagnosis and Catheterization Laboratory Activation Systems on Sex- and Age-Based Differences in Treatment Delay
title_fullStr Impact of STEMI Diagnosis and Catheterization Laboratory Activation Systems on Sex- and Age-Based Differences in Treatment Delay
title_full_unstemmed Impact of STEMI Diagnosis and Catheterization Laboratory Activation Systems on Sex- and Age-Based Differences in Treatment Delay
title_short Impact of STEMI Diagnosis and Catheterization Laboratory Activation Systems on Sex- and Age-Based Differences in Treatment Delay
title_sort impact of stemi diagnosis and catheterization laboratory activation systems on sex- and age-based differences in treatment delay
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2021.01.009
work_keys_str_mv AT pachecochristine impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay
AT boivinproulxlaurieanne impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay
AT bastianyalexandra impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay
AT matteaualexis impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay
AT mansoursamer impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay
AT gobeilfrancois impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay
AT simionoanamaria impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay
AT kokisandre impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay
AT baireymerzcnoel impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay
AT potterbrianj impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay