Cargando…
Impact of STEMI Diagnosis and Catheterization Laboratory Activation Systems on Sex- and Age-Based Differences in Treatment Delay
BACKGROUND: Women and the elderly with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) experience longer treatment delays despite prehospital STEMI diagnosis and catheterization laboratory activation systems. It is not known what role specific STEMI referral systems might play in mediating this gap in ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2021.01.009 |
_version_ | 1783709120029786112 |
---|---|
author | Pacheco, Christine Boivin-Proulx, Laurie-Anne Bastiany, Alexandra Matteau, Alexis Mansour, Samer Gobeil, François Simion, Oana-Maria Kokis, André Bairey Merz, C. Noel Potter, Brian J. |
author_facet | Pacheco, Christine Boivin-Proulx, Laurie-Anne Bastiany, Alexandra Matteau, Alexis Mansour, Samer Gobeil, François Simion, Oana-Maria Kokis, André Bairey Merz, C. Noel Potter, Brian J. |
author_sort | Pacheco, Christine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Women and the elderly with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) experience longer treatment delays despite prehospital STEMI diagnosis and catheterization laboratory activation systems. It is not known what role specific STEMI referral systems might play in mediating this gap in care. We therefore examined sex- and age-based differences in STEMI treatment delay (TD) in different STEMI activation systems. METHODS: This observational comparative effectiveness study comprised 3 retrospective STEMI cohorts: a traditional hospital-based activation cohort (Cohort 1), an automated “physician-blind” prehospital activation cohort (Cohort 2), and a prehospital activation with real-time physician oversight cohort (Cohort 3). Outcomes of interest included sex and age group (< or ≥ 75 years) differences in suboptimal (> 90 minutes) first medical contact-to-device time (FMC-to-device) within each cohort, as well as independent predictors of suboptimal FMC-to-device and in-hospital mortality across cohorts. RESULTS: Five hundred-sixty STEMI activations were analyzed. In Cohort 1 (n = 179), women and those ≥ 75 were more likely to experience suboptimal FMC-to-device times (78.7% vs 36.4%, P = 0.02 and 85.0% vs 58.3%, < 0.01, respectively). Similar findings were observed in Cohort 3 (n = 109) (53.5% vs 32.9%, 56.5% vs 33.3%, respectively; P = 0.05, for both). In Cohort 2 (n = 272), however, there was no significant age-based difference (30.4% vs 21.7%, P = 0.18), and the gap was numerically lower but still significant for women (32.1% vs 20.1%, P = 0.04). When examining prehospital activation cohorts only, female sex (P = 0.03), off-hours presentation (P < 0.01), and physician oversight (P < 0.01) were independent predictors of longer FMC-to-device times. Age ≥ 75 (P < 0.01), Killip class (P < 0.01), and female sex (P = 0.04) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Automated “physician-blind” STEMI activation was associated with a reduced TD gap in women and the elderly, suggesting possible systemic bias. Appropriately powered confirmatory studies are required, but incorporating automated diagnosis and catheterization laboratory activation may be a solution to treatment gaps in STEMI care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8209393 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82093932021-06-23 Impact of STEMI Diagnosis and Catheterization Laboratory Activation Systems on Sex- and Age-Based Differences in Treatment Delay Pacheco, Christine Boivin-Proulx, Laurie-Anne Bastiany, Alexandra Matteau, Alexis Mansour, Samer Gobeil, François Simion, Oana-Maria Kokis, André Bairey Merz, C. Noel Potter, Brian J. CJC Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Women and the elderly with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) experience longer treatment delays despite prehospital STEMI diagnosis and catheterization laboratory activation systems. It is not known what role specific STEMI referral systems might play in mediating this gap in care. We therefore examined sex- and age-based differences in STEMI treatment delay (TD) in different STEMI activation systems. METHODS: This observational comparative effectiveness study comprised 3 retrospective STEMI cohorts: a traditional hospital-based activation cohort (Cohort 1), an automated “physician-blind” prehospital activation cohort (Cohort 2), and a prehospital activation with real-time physician oversight cohort (Cohort 3). Outcomes of interest included sex and age group (< or ≥ 75 years) differences in suboptimal (> 90 minutes) first medical contact-to-device time (FMC-to-device) within each cohort, as well as independent predictors of suboptimal FMC-to-device and in-hospital mortality across cohorts. RESULTS: Five hundred-sixty STEMI activations were analyzed. In Cohort 1 (n = 179), women and those ≥ 75 were more likely to experience suboptimal FMC-to-device times (78.7% vs 36.4%, P = 0.02 and 85.0% vs 58.3%, < 0.01, respectively). Similar findings were observed in Cohort 3 (n = 109) (53.5% vs 32.9%, 56.5% vs 33.3%, respectively; P = 0.05, for both). In Cohort 2 (n = 272), however, there was no significant age-based difference (30.4% vs 21.7%, P = 0.18), and the gap was numerically lower but still significant for women (32.1% vs 20.1%, P = 0.04). When examining prehospital activation cohorts only, female sex (P = 0.03), off-hours presentation (P < 0.01), and physician oversight (P < 0.01) were independent predictors of longer FMC-to-device times. Age ≥ 75 (P < 0.01), Killip class (P < 0.01), and female sex (P = 0.04) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Automated “physician-blind” STEMI activation was associated with a reduced TD gap in women and the elderly, suggesting possible systemic bias. Appropriately powered confirmatory studies are required, but incorporating automated diagnosis and catheterization laboratory activation may be a solution to treatment gaps in STEMI care. Elsevier 2021-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8209393/ /pubmed/34169251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2021.01.009 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pacheco, Christine Boivin-Proulx, Laurie-Anne Bastiany, Alexandra Matteau, Alexis Mansour, Samer Gobeil, François Simion, Oana-Maria Kokis, André Bairey Merz, C. Noel Potter, Brian J. Impact of STEMI Diagnosis and Catheterization Laboratory Activation Systems on Sex- and Age-Based Differences in Treatment Delay |
title | Impact of STEMI Diagnosis and Catheterization Laboratory Activation Systems on Sex- and Age-Based Differences in Treatment Delay |
title_full | Impact of STEMI Diagnosis and Catheterization Laboratory Activation Systems on Sex- and Age-Based Differences in Treatment Delay |
title_fullStr | Impact of STEMI Diagnosis and Catheterization Laboratory Activation Systems on Sex- and Age-Based Differences in Treatment Delay |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of STEMI Diagnosis and Catheterization Laboratory Activation Systems on Sex- and Age-Based Differences in Treatment Delay |
title_short | Impact of STEMI Diagnosis and Catheterization Laboratory Activation Systems on Sex- and Age-Based Differences in Treatment Delay |
title_sort | impact of stemi diagnosis and catheterization laboratory activation systems on sex- and age-based differences in treatment delay |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2021.01.009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pachecochristine impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay AT boivinproulxlaurieanne impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay AT bastianyalexandra impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay AT matteaualexis impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay AT mansoursamer impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay AT gobeilfrancois impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay AT simionoanamaria impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay AT kokisandre impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay AT baireymerzcnoel impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay AT potterbrianj impactofstemidiagnosisandcatheterizationlaboratoryactivationsystemsonsexandagebaseddifferencesintreatmentdelay |