Cargando…

Cost‐effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI‐guided biopsy in a population‐based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro‐simulation model

BACKGROUND: The introduction of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and MRI‐guided biopsy has improved the diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, it remains uncertain whether it is cost‐effective, especially in a population‐based screening strategy. METHODS: We used a micro‐simulation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Getaneh, Abraham M., Heijnsdijk, Eveline AM, de Koning, Harry J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33991077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3932
_version_ 1783709166249967616
author Getaneh, Abraham M.
Heijnsdijk, Eveline AM
de Koning, Harry J.
author_facet Getaneh, Abraham M.
Heijnsdijk, Eveline AM
de Koning, Harry J.
author_sort Getaneh, Abraham M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The introduction of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and MRI‐guided biopsy has improved the diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, it remains uncertain whether it is cost‐effective, especially in a population‐based screening strategy. METHODS: We used a micro‐simulation model to assess the cost‐effectiveness of an MRI‐based prostate cancer screening in comparison to the classical prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) screening, at a population level. The test sensitivity parameters for the mpMRI and MRI‐guided biopsy, grade misclassification rates, utility estimates, and the unit costs of different interventions were obtained from literature. We assumed the same screening attendance rate and biopsy compliance rate for both strategies. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis, consisting of 1000 model runs, was performed to estimate a mean incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) and assess uncertainty. A €20,000 willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) threshold per quality‐adjusted life year (QALY) gained, and a discounting rate of 3.5% was considered in the analysis. RESULTS: The MRI‐based screening improved the life‐years (LY) and QALYs gained by 3.5 and 3, respectively, in comparison to the classical screening pathway. Based on the probabilistic sensitivity analyses, the MRI screening pathway leads to total discounted mean incremental costs of €15,413 (95% confidence interval (CI) of €14,556–€16,272) compared to the classical screening pathway. The corresponding discounted mean incremental QALYs gained was 1.36 (95% CI of 1.31–1.40), resulting in a mean ICER of €11,355 per QALY gained. At a WTP threshold of €20,000, the MRI screening pathway has about 84% chance to be more cost‐effective than the classical screening pathway. CONCLUSIONS: For triennial screening from age 55–64, incorporation of mpMRI as a reflex test after a positive PSA test result with a subsequent MRI‐guided biopsy has a high probability to be more cost‐effective as compared with the classical prostate cancer screening pathway.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8209626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82096262021-06-25 Cost‐effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI‐guided biopsy in a population‐based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro‐simulation model Getaneh, Abraham M. Heijnsdijk, Eveline AM de Koning, Harry J. Cancer Med Cancer Prevention BACKGROUND: The introduction of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and MRI‐guided biopsy has improved the diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, it remains uncertain whether it is cost‐effective, especially in a population‐based screening strategy. METHODS: We used a micro‐simulation model to assess the cost‐effectiveness of an MRI‐based prostate cancer screening in comparison to the classical prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) screening, at a population level. The test sensitivity parameters for the mpMRI and MRI‐guided biopsy, grade misclassification rates, utility estimates, and the unit costs of different interventions were obtained from literature. We assumed the same screening attendance rate and biopsy compliance rate for both strategies. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis, consisting of 1000 model runs, was performed to estimate a mean incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) and assess uncertainty. A €20,000 willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) threshold per quality‐adjusted life year (QALY) gained, and a discounting rate of 3.5% was considered in the analysis. RESULTS: The MRI‐based screening improved the life‐years (LY) and QALYs gained by 3.5 and 3, respectively, in comparison to the classical screening pathway. Based on the probabilistic sensitivity analyses, the MRI screening pathway leads to total discounted mean incremental costs of €15,413 (95% confidence interval (CI) of €14,556–€16,272) compared to the classical screening pathway. The corresponding discounted mean incremental QALYs gained was 1.36 (95% CI of 1.31–1.40), resulting in a mean ICER of €11,355 per QALY gained. At a WTP threshold of €20,000, the MRI screening pathway has about 84% chance to be more cost‐effective than the classical screening pathway. CONCLUSIONS: For triennial screening from age 55–64, incorporation of mpMRI as a reflex test after a positive PSA test result with a subsequent MRI‐guided biopsy has a high probability to be more cost‐effective as compared with the classical prostate cancer screening pathway. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8209626/ /pubmed/33991077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3932 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cancer Prevention
Getaneh, Abraham M.
Heijnsdijk, Eveline AM
de Koning, Harry J.
Cost‐effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI‐guided biopsy in a population‐based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro‐simulation model
title Cost‐effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI‐guided biopsy in a population‐based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro‐simulation model
title_full Cost‐effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI‐guided biopsy in a population‐based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro‐simulation model
title_fullStr Cost‐effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI‐guided biopsy in a population‐based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro‐simulation model
title_full_unstemmed Cost‐effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI‐guided biopsy in a population‐based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro‐simulation model
title_short Cost‐effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI‐guided biopsy in a population‐based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro‐simulation model
title_sort cost‐effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and mri‐guided biopsy in a population‐based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro‐simulation model
topic Cancer Prevention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33991077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3932
work_keys_str_mv AT getanehabrahamm costeffectivenessofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingandmriguidedbiopsyinapopulationbasedprostatecancerscreeningsettingusingamicrosimulationmodel
AT heijnsdijkevelineam costeffectivenessofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingandmriguidedbiopsyinapopulationbasedprostatecancerscreeningsettingusingamicrosimulationmodel
AT dekoningharryj costeffectivenessofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingandmriguidedbiopsyinapopulationbasedprostatecancerscreeningsettingusingamicrosimulationmodel