Cargando…

Remote Musculoskeletal Consultations: A Survey of General Practitioner Registrars’ Level of Confidence, Acceptability, and Management

Background and objective The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has accelerated the shift towards remote consultations in the medical field, including musculoskeletal (MSK) appointments. General practitioner (GP) registrars are now routinely conducting many MSK consultations remotely; howe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahni, Manroy, Choudhry, Jamaal, Mittal, Ankush, Bhogal, Gurjit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34150413
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15084
_version_ 1783709193087221760
author Sahni, Manroy
Choudhry, Jamaal
Mittal, Ankush
Bhogal, Gurjit
author_facet Sahni, Manroy
Choudhry, Jamaal
Mittal, Ankush
Bhogal, Gurjit
author_sort Sahni, Manroy
collection PubMed
description Background and objective The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has accelerated the shift towards remote consultations in the medical field, including musculoskeletal (MSK) appointments. General practitioner (GP) registrars are now routinely conducting many MSK consultations remotely; however, very little is known of their level of confidence and satisfaction regarding this new and evolving scenario, or how this may impact patient management of patients. In this study, we aimed to understand GP registrars' level of confidence and satisfaction with respect to remote MSK consultations, and the perceived impact on patient management. Study design This study involved a cross-sectional online survey of GP registrars in the West Midlands, which was conducted in January 2021. Methods The survey asked for ranked responses to questions comparing face-to-face consulting methods with remote consulting, focusing on confidence, satisfaction, onward investigations, and referral activity. Statistical analysis was performed using the R software version 4.0.3. Results The overall survey response was 21.2% (n=312/1,471). Of the respondents, 85.9% of GP registrars had not received any training to prepare them for remote MSK consultations. GP registrars generally felt that they were more confident when treating patients face-to-face compared to remote consultations (p<0.001). This was true for general MSK complaints as well as specific assessments of the hand, shoulder, spine, hip, knee, and ankle; 36.2% of GP registrars were not satisfied and 51.0% thought that their patients were not satisfied with the current quality of remote MSK consultations. Of note, 77.6% of GP registrars said that they were more likely to request additional investigations, and 75.6% stated that they were more likely to refer patients to a specialist after a remote MSK consultation. Conclusion This study highlights the need for further training to better equip primary care doctors for remote MSK consultations. With tailored training, GP registrars could offer more streamlined remote patient care for MSK complaints.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8209758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82097582021-06-17 Remote Musculoskeletal Consultations: A Survey of General Practitioner Registrars’ Level of Confidence, Acceptability, and Management Sahni, Manroy Choudhry, Jamaal Mittal, Ankush Bhogal, Gurjit Cureus Family/General Practice Background and objective The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has accelerated the shift towards remote consultations in the medical field, including musculoskeletal (MSK) appointments. General practitioner (GP) registrars are now routinely conducting many MSK consultations remotely; however, very little is known of their level of confidence and satisfaction regarding this new and evolving scenario, or how this may impact patient management of patients. In this study, we aimed to understand GP registrars' level of confidence and satisfaction with respect to remote MSK consultations, and the perceived impact on patient management. Study design This study involved a cross-sectional online survey of GP registrars in the West Midlands, which was conducted in January 2021. Methods The survey asked for ranked responses to questions comparing face-to-face consulting methods with remote consulting, focusing on confidence, satisfaction, onward investigations, and referral activity. Statistical analysis was performed using the R software version 4.0.3. Results The overall survey response was 21.2% (n=312/1,471). Of the respondents, 85.9% of GP registrars had not received any training to prepare them for remote MSK consultations. GP registrars generally felt that they were more confident when treating patients face-to-face compared to remote consultations (p<0.001). This was true for general MSK complaints as well as specific assessments of the hand, shoulder, spine, hip, knee, and ankle; 36.2% of GP registrars were not satisfied and 51.0% thought that their patients were not satisfied with the current quality of remote MSK consultations. Of note, 77.6% of GP registrars said that they were more likely to request additional investigations, and 75.6% stated that they were more likely to refer patients to a specialist after a remote MSK consultation. Conclusion This study highlights the need for further training to better equip primary care doctors for remote MSK consultations. With tailored training, GP registrars could offer more streamlined remote patient care for MSK complaints. Cureus 2021-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8209758/ /pubmed/34150413 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15084 Text en Copyright © 2021, Sahni et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Family/General Practice
Sahni, Manroy
Choudhry, Jamaal
Mittal, Ankush
Bhogal, Gurjit
Remote Musculoskeletal Consultations: A Survey of General Practitioner Registrars’ Level of Confidence, Acceptability, and Management
title Remote Musculoskeletal Consultations: A Survey of General Practitioner Registrars’ Level of Confidence, Acceptability, and Management
title_full Remote Musculoskeletal Consultations: A Survey of General Practitioner Registrars’ Level of Confidence, Acceptability, and Management
title_fullStr Remote Musculoskeletal Consultations: A Survey of General Practitioner Registrars’ Level of Confidence, Acceptability, and Management
title_full_unstemmed Remote Musculoskeletal Consultations: A Survey of General Practitioner Registrars’ Level of Confidence, Acceptability, and Management
title_short Remote Musculoskeletal Consultations: A Survey of General Practitioner Registrars’ Level of Confidence, Acceptability, and Management
title_sort remote musculoskeletal consultations: a survey of general practitioner registrars’ level of confidence, acceptability, and management
topic Family/General Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34150413
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15084
work_keys_str_mv AT sahnimanroy remotemusculoskeletalconsultationsasurveyofgeneralpractitionerregistrarslevelofconfidenceacceptabilityandmanagement
AT choudhryjamaal remotemusculoskeletalconsultationsasurveyofgeneralpractitionerregistrarslevelofconfidenceacceptabilityandmanagement
AT mittalankush remotemusculoskeletalconsultationsasurveyofgeneralpractitionerregistrarslevelofconfidenceacceptabilityandmanagement
AT bhogalgurjit remotemusculoskeletalconsultationsasurveyofgeneralpractitionerregistrarslevelofconfidenceacceptabilityandmanagement