Cargando…
Factors associated with antimicrobial choice for surgical prophylaxis in Australia
BACKGROUND: Cefazolin is the most commonly recommended antimicrobial for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP). However, the Australian Surgical National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey revealed a wide range of antimicrobials prescribed for SAP. Inappropriate use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaa036 |
_version_ | 1783709237703081984 |
---|---|
author | Ierano, Courtney Thursky, Karin Peel, Trisha Koning, Sonia James, Rod Johnson, Sandra Hall, Lisa Worth, Leon J Marshall, Caroline |
author_facet | Ierano, Courtney Thursky, Karin Peel, Trisha Koning, Sonia James, Rod Johnson, Sandra Hall, Lisa Worth, Leon J Marshall, Caroline |
author_sort | Ierano, Courtney |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cefazolin is the most commonly recommended antimicrobial for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP). However, the Australian Surgical National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey revealed a wide range of antimicrobials prescribed for SAP. Inappropriate use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials is associated with increased patient harm and is a posited driver for antimicrobial resistance. OBJECTIVES: To describe patient, hospital and surgical factors that are associated with appropriateness of the top five prescribed antimicrobials/antimicrobial classes for procedural SAP. METHODS: All procedures audited from 18 April 2016 to 15 April 2019 in the Surgical National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey were included in the analysis. Estimated marginal means analyses accounted for a range of variables and calculated a rate of adjusted appropriateness (AA). Subanalyses of the top five audited antimicrobials/antimicrobial classes identified associations between variables and appropriateness. RESULTS: A total of 12 419 surgical episodes with 14 150 prescribed initial procedural doses were included for analysis. When procedural SAP was prescribed, appropriateness was low (57.7%). Allergy status, surgical procedure group and the presence of prosthetic material were positively associated with cefazolin and aminoglycoside appropriateness (P < 0.05). There were no significant positive associations with glycopeptides and third/fourth-generation cephalosporins. The use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials was the most common reason for inappropriate choice (67.9% of metronidazole to 83.3% of third/fourth-generation cephalosporin prescriptions). CONCLUSIONS: Various factors influence appropriateness of procedural SAP choice. Identification of these factors provides targets for antimicrobial stewardship interventions, e.g. procedures where surgeons are regularly prescribing broad-spectrum SAP. These can be tailored to address local hospital prescribing practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8210066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82100662021-07-02 Factors associated with antimicrobial choice for surgical prophylaxis in Australia Ierano, Courtney Thursky, Karin Peel, Trisha Koning, Sonia James, Rod Johnson, Sandra Hall, Lisa Worth, Leon J Marshall, Caroline JAC Antimicrob Resist Original Article BACKGROUND: Cefazolin is the most commonly recommended antimicrobial for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP). However, the Australian Surgical National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey revealed a wide range of antimicrobials prescribed for SAP. Inappropriate use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials is associated with increased patient harm and is a posited driver for antimicrobial resistance. OBJECTIVES: To describe patient, hospital and surgical factors that are associated with appropriateness of the top five prescribed antimicrobials/antimicrobial classes for procedural SAP. METHODS: All procedures audited from 18 April 2016 to 15 April 2019 in the Surgical National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey were included in the analysis. Estimated marginal means analyses accounted for a range of variables and calculated a rate of adjusted appropriateness (AA). Subanalyses of the top five audited antimicrobials/antimicrobial classes identified associations between variables and appropriateness. RESULTS: A total of 12 419 surgical episodes with 14 150 prescribed initial procedural doses were included for analysis. When procedural SAP was prescribed, appropriateness was low (57.7%). Allergy status, surgical procedure group and the presence of prosthetic material were positively associated with cefazolin and aminoglycoside appropriateness (P < 0.05). There were no significant positive associations with glycopeptides and third/fourth-generation cephalosporins. The use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials was the most common reason for inappropriate choice (67.9% of metronidazole to 83.3% of third/fourth-generation cephalosporin prescriptions). CONCLUSIONS: Various factors influence appropriateness of procedural SAP choice. Identification of these factors provides targets for antimicrobial stewardship interventions, e.g. procedures where surgeons are regularly prescribing broad-spectrum SAP. These can be tailored to address local hospital prescribing practices. Oxford University Press 2020-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8210066/ /pubmed/34223002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaa036 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ierano, Courtney Thursky, Karin Peel, Trisha Koning, Sonia James, Rod Johnson, Sandra Hall, Lisa Worth, Leon J Marshall, Caroline Factors associated with antimicrobial choice for surgical prophylaxis in Australia |
title | Factors associated with antimicrobial choice for surgical prophylaxis in Australia |
title_full | Factors associated with antimicrobial choice for surgical prophylaxis in Australia |
title_fullStr | Factors associated with antimicrobial choice for surgical prophylaxis in Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors associated with antimicrobial choice for surgical prophylaxis in Australia |
title_short | Factors associated with antimicrobial choice for surgical prophylaxis in Australia |
title_sort | factors associated with antimicrobial choice for surgical prophylaxis in australia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaa036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ieranocourtney factorsassociatedwithantimicrobialchoiceforsurgicalprophylaxisinaustralia AT thurskykarin factorsassociatedwithantimicrobialchoiceforsurgicalprophylaxisinaustralia AT peeltrisha factorsassociatedwithantimicrobialchoiceforsurgicalprophylaxisinaustralia AT koningsonia factorsassociatedwithantimicrobialchoiceforsurgicalprophylaxisinaustralia AT jamesrod factorsassociatedwithantimicrobialchoiceforsurgicalprophylaxisinaustralia AT johnsonsandra factorsassociatedwithantimicrobialchoiceforsurgicalprophylaxisinaustralia AT halllisa factorsassociatedwithantimicrobialchoiceforsurgicalprophylaxisinaustralia AT worthleonj factorsassociatedwithantimicrobialchoiceforsurgicalprophylaxisinaustralia AT marshallcaroline factorsassociatedwithantimicrobialchoiceforsurgicalprophylaxisinaustralia |