Cargando…
Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate
ESBLs are a group of plasmid-mediated, diverse, complex and rapidly evolving enzymes that pose a therapeutic challenge today in hospital- and community-acquired infections. Thirty-six years after the first report, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for ESBLs are still the subject of controversy....
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlab035 |
_version_ | 1783709245231857664 |
---|---|
author | Villegas, Maria Virginia Esparza, German Reyes, Jinnethe |
author_facet | Villegas, Maria Virginia Esparza, German Reyes, Jinnethe |
author_sort | Villegas, Maria Virginia |
collection | PubMed |
description | ESBLs are a group of plasmid-mediated, diverse, complex and rapidly evolving enzymes that pose a therapeutic challenge today in hospital- and community-acquired infections. Thirty-six years after the first report, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for ESBLs are still the subject of controversy. Detection of these enzymes is recommended for epidemiological purposes and facilitates targeted therapy, necessary for antimicrobial stewardship. On the other hand, ESBLs are not confined to specific species, phenotypic detection methods have pitfalls, and concerns exist about the accuracy of antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems to rely on MIC values for cephalosporins and β-lactam combination agents. In this issue, we present a PRO/CON debate on ESBL testing for ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8210106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82101062021-07-02 Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate Villegas, Maria Virginia Esparza, German Reyes, Jinnethe JAC Antimicrob Resist Viewpoint ESBLs are a group of plasmid-mediated, diverse, complex and rapidly evolving enzymes that pose a therapeutic challenge today in hospital- and community-acquired infections. Thirty-six years after the first report, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for ESBLs are still the subject of controversy. Detection of these enzymes is recommended for epidemiological purposes and facilitates targeted therapy, necessary for antimicrobial stewardship. On the other hand, ESBLs are not confined to specific species, phenotypic detection methods have pitfalls, and concerns exist about the accuracy of antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems to rely on MIC values for cephalosporins and β-lactam combination agents. In this issue, we present a PRO/CON debate on ESBL testing for ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales. Oxford University Press 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8210106/ /pubmed/34223110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlab035 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Viewpoint Villegas, Maria Virginia Esparza, German Reyes, Jinnethe Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate |
title | Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate |
title_full | Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate |
title_fullStr | Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate |
title_full_unstemmed | Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate |
title_short | Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate |
title_sort | should ceftriaxone-resistant enterobacterales be tested for esbls? a pro/con debate |
topic | Viewpoint |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlab035 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT villegasmariavirginia shouldceftriaxoneresistantenterobacteralesbetestedforesblsaprocondebate AT esparzagerman shouldceftriaxoneresistantenterobacteralesbetestedforesblsaprocondebate AT reyesjinnethe shouldceftriaxoneresistantenterobacteralesbetestedforesblsaprocondebate |