Cargando…

Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate

ESBLs are a group of plasmid-mediated, diverse, complex and rapidly evolving enzymes that pose a therapeutic challenge today in hospital- and community-acquired infections. Thirty-six years after the first report, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for ESBLs are still the subject of controversy....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Villegas, Maria Virginia, Esparza, German, Reyes, Jinnethe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlab035
_version_ 1783709245231857664
author Villegas, Maria Virginia
Esparza, German
Reyes, Jinnethe
author_facet Villegas, Maria Virginia
Esparza, German
Reyes, Jinnethe
author_sort Villegas, Maria Virginia
collection PubMed
description ESBLs are a group of plasmid-mediated, diverse, complex and rapidly evolving enzymes that pose a therapeutic challenge today in hospital- and community-acquired infections. Thirty-six years after the first report, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for ESBLs are still the subject of controversy. Detection of these enzymes is recommended for epidemiological purposes and facilitates targeted therapy, necessary for antimicrobial stewardship. On the other hand, ESBLs are not confined to specific species, phenotypic detection methods have pitfalls, and concerns exist about the accuracy of antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems to rely on MIC values for cephalosporins and β-lactam combination agents. In this issue, we present a PRO/CON debate on ESBL testing for ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8210106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82101062021-07-02 Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate Villegas, Maria Virginia Esparza, German Reyes, Jinnethe JAC Antimicrob Resist Viewpoint ESBLs are a group of plasmid-mediated, diverse, complex and rapidly evolving enzymes that pose a therapeutic challenge today in hospital- and community-acquired infections. Thirty-six years after the first report, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for ESBLs are still the subject of controversy. Detection of these enzymes is recommended for epidemiological purposes and facilitates targeted therapy, necessary for antimicrobial stewardship. On the other hand, ESBLs are not confined to specific species, phenotypic detection methods have pitfalls, and concerns exist about the accuracy of antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems to rely on MIC values for cephalosporins and β-lactam combination agents. In this issue, we present a PRO/CON debate on ESBL testing for ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales. Oxford University Press 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8210106/ /pubmed/34223110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlab035 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Viewpoint
Villegas, Maria Virginia
Esparza, German
Reyes, Jinnethe
Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate
title Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate
title_full Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate
title_fullStr Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate
title_full_unstemmed Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate
title_short Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate
title_sort should ceftriaxone-resistant enterobacterales be tested for esbls? a pro/con debate
topic Viewpoint
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlab035
work_keys_str_mv AT villegasmariavirginia shouldceftriaxoneresistantenterobacteralesbetestedforesblsaprocondebate
AT esparzagerman shouldceftriaxoneresistantenterobacteralesbetestedforesblsaprocondebate
AT reyesjinnethe shouldceftriaxoneresistantenterobacteralesbetestedforesblsaprocondebate