Cargando…
CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales
Carbapenems are considered the drugs of choice for the treatment of serious infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales. However, because of the dramatic increase in carbapenem-resistant organisms worldwide, finding alternatives to carbapenems is a must. The potential options include...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaa112 |
_version_ | 1783709245697425408 |
---|---|
author | Rodríguez-Baño, Jesús Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Belén Pascual, Alvaro |
author_facet | Rodríguez-Baño, Jesús Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Belén Pascual, Alvaro |
author_sort | Rodríguez-Baño, Jesús |
collection | PubMed |
description | Carbapenems are considered the drugs of choice for the treatment of serious infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales. However, because of the dramatic increase in carbapenem-resistant organisms worldwide, finding alternatives to carbapenems is a must. The potential options include β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, temocillin, cephamycins and some non-β-lactam drugs. The most controversial is piperacillin/tazobactam; the results of the MERINO trial are challenged because the isolates of patients with worse outcomes were frequently not susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam when studied by reference methods, and also because the drug was not administered in extended infusion. Other potential options are briefly discussed. We conclude that carbapenems are not necessary for all patients with infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8210108 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82101082021-07-02 CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales Rodríguez-Baño, Jesús Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Belén Pascual, Alvaro JAC Antimicrob Resist For Debate Carbapenems are considered the drugs of choice for the treatment of serious infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales. However, because of the dramatic increase in carbapenem-resistant organisms worldwide, finding alternatives to carbapenems is a must. The potential options include β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, temocillin, cephamycins and some non-β-lactam drugs. The most controversial is piperacillin/tazobactam; the results of the MERINO trial are challenged because the isolates of patients with worse outcomes were frequently not susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam when studied by reference methods, and also because the drug was not administered in extended infusion. Other potential options are briefly discussed. We conclude that carbapenems are not necessary for all patients with infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales. Oxford University Press 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8210108/ /pubmed/34223064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaa112 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | For Debate Rodríguez-Baño, Jesús Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Belén Pascual, Alvaro CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales |
title | CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales |
title_full | CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales |
title_fullStr | CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales |
title_full_unstemmed | CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales |
title_short | CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales |
title_sort | con: carbapenems are not necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant enterobacterales |
topic | For Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaa112 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rodriguezbanojesus concarbapenemsarenotnecessaryforallinfectionscausedbyceftriaxoneresistantenterobacterales AT gutierrezgutierrezbelen concarbapenemsarenotnecessaryforallinfectionscausedbyceftriaxoneresistantenterobacterales AT pascualalvaro concarbapenemsarenotnecessaryforallinfectionscausedbyceftriaxoneresistantenterobacterales |