Cargando…

CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales

Carbapenems are considered the drugs of choice for the treatment of serious infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales. However, because of the dramatic increase in carbapenem-resistant organisms worldwide, finding alternatives to carbapenems is a must. The potential options include...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodríguez-Baño, Jesús, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Belén, Pascual, Alvaro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaa112
_version_ 1783709245697425408
author Rodríguez-Baño, Jesús
Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Belén
Pascual, Alvaro
author_facet Rodríguez-Baño, Jesús
Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Belén
Pascual, Alvaro
author_sort Rodríguez-Baño, Jesús
collection PubMed
description Carbapenems are considered the drugs of choice for the treatment of serious infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales. However, because of the dramatic increase in carbapenem-resistant organisms worldwide, finding alternatives to carbapenems is a must. The potential options include β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, temocillin, cephamycins and some non-β-lactam drugs. The most controversial is piperacillin/tazobactam; the results of the MERINO trial are challenged because the isolates of patients with worse outcomes were frequently not susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam when studied by reference methods, and also because the drug was not administered in extended infusion. Other potential options are briefly discussed. We conclude that carbapenems are not necessary for all patients with infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8210108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82101082021-07-02 CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales Rodríguez-Baño, Jesús Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Belén Pascual, Alvaro JAC Antimicrob Resist For Debate Carbapenems are considered the drugs of choice for the treatment of serious infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales. However, because of the dramatic increase in carbapenem-resistant organisms worldwide, finding alternatives to carbapenems is a must. The potential options include β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, temocillin, cephamycins and some non-β-lactam drugs. The most controversial is piperacillin/tazobactam; the results of the MERINO trial are challenged because the isolates of patients with worse outcomes were frequently not susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam when studied by reference methods, and also because the drug was not administered in extended infusion. Other potential options are briefly discussed. We conclude that carbapenems are not necessary for all patients with infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales. Oxford University Press 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8210108/ /pubmed/34223064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaa112 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle For Debate
Rodríguez-Baño, Jesús
Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Belén
Pascual, Alvaro
CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales
title CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales
title_full CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales
title_fullStr CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales
title_full_unstemmed CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales
title_short CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales
title_sort con: carbapenems are not necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant enterobacterales
topic For Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaa112
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguezbanojesus concarbapenemsarenotnecessaryforallinfectionscausedbyceftriaxoneresistantenterobacterales
AT gutierrezgutierrezbelen concarbapenemsarenotnecessaryforallinfectionscausedbyceftriaxoneresistantenterobacterales
AT pascualalvaro concarbapenemsarenotnecessaryforallinfectionscausedbyceftriaxoneresistantenterobacterales