Cargando…
CON: Testing for ESBL production is unnecessary for ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales
Phenotypic testing for Enterobacterales that harbour ESBLs is not additive to accurate in vitro β-lactam MICs for clinical decision-making. ESBL testing is an outdated practice established in an era of higher cephalosporin breakpoints to prevent resistant Enterobacterales carrying Ambler class A β-l...
Autores principales: | Mathers, Amy J, Lewis, James S |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlab020 |
Ejemplares similares
-
PRO: Testing for ESBL production is necessary for ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales: perfect should not be the enemy of progress
por: Tamma, Pranita D, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales
por: Rodríguez-Baño, Jesús, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate
por: Villegas, Maria Virginia, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
PRO: Carbapenems should be used for ALL infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales
por: Paterson, David L, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Detection of Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacterales—From ESBLs to Carbapenemases
por: Noster, Janina, et al.
Publicado: (2021)