Cargando…

PRO: Carbapenems should be used for ALL infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales

Ceftriaxone resistance in the Enterobacterales is typically the result of production of ESBLs or AmpC β-lactamases. The genes encoding these enzymes are often co-located with other antibiotic resistance genes leading to resistance to aminoglycosides, quinolones and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paterson, David L, Isler, Burcu, Harris, Patrick N A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlab013
_version_ 1783709262443184128
author Paterson, David L
Isler, Burcu
Harris, Patrick N A
author_facet Paterson, David L
Isler, Burcu
Harris, Patrick N A
author_sort Paterson, David L
collection PubMed
description Ceftriaxone resistance in the Enterobacterales is typically the result of production of ESBLs or AmpC β-lactamases. The genes encoding these enzymes are often co-located with other antibiotic resistance genes leading to resistance to aminoglycosides, quinolones and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Carbapenems are stable to ESBLs and AmpC giving them reliable in vitro activity against producers of these β-lactamases. In contrast, piperacillin/tazobactam and amoxicillin/clavulanate are compromised by co-production of OXA-1, which is not inhibited by tazobactam or clavulanate. These in vitro findings provide an explanation for the MERINO trial outcomes, where 3.7% (7/191) randomized to meropenem died compared with 12.3% (23/187) randomized to piperacillin/tazobactam as definitive treatment of bloodstream infection due to ceftriaxone-resistant organisms. No randomized trials have yet put cefepime and carbapenems head to head, but some observational studies have shown worse outcomes with cefepime. We argue that carbapenems are the antibiotics of choice for ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8210194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82101942021-07-02 PRO: Carbapenems should be used for ALL infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales Paterson, David L Isler, Burcu Harris, Patrick N A JAC Antimicrob Resist For Debate Ceftriaxone resistance in the Enterobacterales is typically the result of production of ESBLs or AmpC β-lactamases. The genes encoding these enzymes are often co-located with other antibiotic resistance genes leading to resistance to aminoglycosides, quinolones and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Carbapenems are stable to ESBLs and AmpC giving them reliable in vitro activity against producers of these β-lactamases. In contrast, piperacillin/tazobactam and amoxicillin/clavulanate are compromised by co-production of OXA-1, which is not inhibited by tazobactam or clavulanate. These in vitro findings provide an explanation for the MERINO trial outcomes, where 3.7% (7/191) randomized to meropenem died compared with 12.3% (23/187) randomized to piperacillin/tazobactam as definitive treatment of bloodstream infection due to ceftriaxone-resistant organisms. No randomized trials have yet put cefepime and carbapenems head to head, but some observational studies have shown worse outcomes with cefepime. We argue that carbapenems are the antibiotics of choice for ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales. Oxford University Press 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8210194/ /pubmed/34223090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlab013 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle For Debate
Paterson, David L
Isler, Burcu
Harris, Patrick N A
PRO: Carbapenems should be used for ALL infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales
title PRO: Carbapenems should be used for ALL infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales
title_full PRO: Carbapenems should be used for ALL infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales
title_fullStr PRO: Carbapenems should be used for ALL infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales
title_full_unstemmed PRO: Carbapenems should be used for ALL infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales
title_short PRO: Carbapenems should be used for ALL infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales
title_sort pro: carbapenems should be used for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant enterobacterales
topic For Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlab013
work_keys_str_mv AT patersondavidl procarbapenemsshouldbeusedforallinfectionscausedbyceftriaxoneresistantenterobacterales
AT islerburcu procarbapenemsshouldbeusedforallinfectionscausedbyceftriaxoneresistantenterobacterales
AT harrispatrickna procarbapenemsshouldbeusedforallinfectionscausedbyceftriaxoneresistantenterobacterales