Cargando…

Pain modulation by audiovisual distraction during cystoscopy

INTRODUCTION: Cystoscopy is one of the most common urological procedures used for either diagnostics, therapeutics, or for surveillance. It may be performed under local or general anesthesia. The procedure is associated with pain and discomfort. AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the levels o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alhlib, Amadadin R., Haffejee, Mohamed, Nel, Marietha J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34194143
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_104_20
_version_ 1783709366581460992
author Alhlib, Amadadin R.
Haffejee, Mohamed
Nel, Marietha J.
author_facet Alhlib, Amadadin R.
Haffejee, Mohamed
Nel, Marietha J.
author_sort Alhlib, Amadadin R.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cystoscopy is one of the most common urological procedures used for either diagnostics, therapeutics, or for surveillance. It may be performed under local or general anesthesia. The procedure is associated with pain and discomfort. AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the levels of perceived pain during local cystoscopy with and without audiovisual distraction (AVD). METHODOLOGY: A randomized control study was performed at our academic hospital local cystoscopy theater of the urology division. Approximately half the patients already booked for the local rigid cystoscopy procedure were exposed to a distracting musical video during the procedure (study group), while the control group was not. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics were used to determine percentage, mean, and standard deviation (SD) for categorical data. The Mann–Whitney U-test for nonparametric data was used for comparing pain levels. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients participated in the study with 48 patients in the study group and 43 patients in the control group. The visual analog scale (VAS) ranged between 1 and 5/10 in the study group and 1–8/10 in the control group, while the mean VAS was 2.52 ± 1.2 SD in the study group and 4.97 ± 1.35 SD in the control group. The AVD intervention was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: AVD during local rigid cystoscopy is highly recommended, especially in patients undergoing the procedure for the first time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8210720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82107202021-06-29 Pain modulation by audiovisual distraction during cystoscopy Alhlib, Amadadin R. Haffejee, Mohamed Nel, Marietha J. Urol Ann Original Article INTRODUCTION: Cystoscopy is one of the most common urological procedures used for either diagnostics, therapeutics, or for surveillance. It may be performed under local or general anesthesia. The procedure is associated with pain and discomfort. AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the levels of perceived pain during local cystoscopy with and without audiovisual distraction (AVD). METHODOLOGY: A randomized control study was performed at our academic hospital local cystoscopy theater of the urology division. Approximately half the patients already booked for the local rigid cystoscopy procedure were exposed to a distracting musical video during the procedure (study group), while the control group was not. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics were used to determine percentage, mean, and standard deviation (SD) for categorical data. The Mann–Whitney U-test for nonparametric data was used for comparing pain levels. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients participated in the study with 48 patients in the study group and 43 patients in the control group. The visual analog scale (VAS) ranged between 1 and 5/10 in the study group and 1–8/10 in the control group, while the mean VAS was 2.52 ± 1.2 SD in the study group and 4.97 ± 1.35 SD in the control group. The AVD intervention was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: AVD during local rigid cystoscopy is highly recommended, especially in patients undergoing the procedure for the first time. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8210720/ /pubmed/34194143 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_104_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Urology Annals https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alhlib, Amadadin R.
Haffejee, Mohamed
Nel, Marietha J.
Pain modulation by audiovisual distraction during cystoscopy
title Pain modulation by audiovisual distraction during cystoscopy
title_full Pain modulation by audiovisual distraction during cystoscopy
title_fullStr Pain modulation by audiovisual distraction during cystoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Pain modulation by audiovisual distraction during cystoscopy
title_short Pain modulation by audiovisual distraction during cystoscopy
title_sort pain modulation by audiovisual distraction during cystoscopy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34194143
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_104_20
work_keys_str_mv AT alhlibamadadinr painmodulationbyaudiovisualdistractionduringcystoscopy
AT haffejeemohamed painmodulationbyaudiovisualdistractionduringcystoscopy
AT nelmariethaj painmodulationbyaudiovisualdistractionduringcystoscopy