Cargando…

Conservation insights from wild bee genetic studies: Geographic differences, susceptibility to inbreeding, and signs of local adaptation

Conserving bees are critical both ecologically and economically. Genetic tools are valuable for monitoring these vital pollinators since tracking these small, fast‐flying insects by traditional means is difficult. By surveying the current state of the literature, this review discusses how recent adv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kelemen, Evan P., Rehan, Sandra M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34178099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13221
_version_ 1783709375173492736
author Kelemen, Evan P.
Rehan, Sandra M.
author_facet Kelemen, Evan P.
Rehan, Sandra M.
author_sort Kelemen, Evan P.
collection PubMed
description Conserving bees are critical both ecologically and economically. Genetic tools are valuable for monitoring these vital pollinators since tracking these small, fast‐flying insects by traditional means is difficult. By surveying the current state of the literature, this review discusses how recent advances in landscape genetic and genomic research are elucidating how wild bees respond to anthropogenic threats. Current literature suggests that there may be geographic differences in the vulnerability of bee species to landscape changes. Populations of temperate bee species are becoming more isolated and more genetically depauperate as their landscape becomes more fragmented, but tropical bee species appear unaffected. These differences may be an artifact of historical differences in land‐use, or it suggests that different management plans are needed for temperate and tropical bee species. Encouragingly, genetic studies on invasive bee species indicate that low levels of genetic diversity may not lead to rapid extinction in bees as once predicted. Additionally, next‐generation sequencing has given researchers the power to identify potential genes under selection, which are likely critical to species’ survival in their rapidly changing environment. While genetic studies provide insights into wild bee biology, more studies focusing on a greater phylogenetic and life‐history breadth of species are needed. Therefore, caution should be taken when making broad conservation decisions based on the currently few species examined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8210791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82107912021-06-25 Conservation insights from wild bee genetic studies: Geographic differences, susceptibility to inbreeding, and signs of local adaptation Kelemen, Evan P. Rehan, Sandra M. Evol Appl Review Conserving bees are critical both ecologically and economically. Genetic tools are valuable for monitoring these vital pollinators since tracking these small, fast‐flying insects by traditional means is difficult. By surveying the current state of the literature, this review discusses how recent advances in landscape genetic and genomic research are elucidating how wild bees respond to anthropogenic threats. Current literature suggests that there may be geographic differences in the vulnerability of bee species to landscape changes. Populations of temperate bee species are becoming more isolated and more genetically depauperate as their landscape becomes more fragmented, but tropical bee species appear unaffected. These differences may be an artifact of historical differences in land‐use, or it suggests that different management plans are needed for temperate and tropical bee species. Encouragingly, genetic studies on invasive bee species indicate that low levels of genetic diversity may not lead to rapid extinction in bees as once predicted. Additionally, next‐generation sequencing has given researchers the power to identify potential genes under selection, which are likely critical to species’ survival in their rapidly changing environment. While genetic studies provide insights into wild bee biology, more studies focusing on a greater phylogenetic and life‐history breadth of species are needed. Therefore, caution should be taken when making broad conservation decisions based on the currently few species examined. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8210791/ /pubmed/34178099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13221 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Kelemen, Evan P.
Rehan, Sandra M.
Conservation insights from wild bee genetic studies: Geographic differences, susceptibility to inbreeding, and signs of local adaptation
title Conservation insights from wild bee genetic studies: Geographic differences, susceptibility to inbreeding, and signs of local adaptation
title_full Conservation insights from wild bee genetic studies: Geographic differences, susceptibility to inbreeding, and signs of local adaptation
title_fullStr Conservation insights from wild bee genetic studies: Geographic differences, susceptibility to inbreeding, and signs of local adaptation
title_full_unstemmed Conservation insights from wild bee genetic studies: Geographic differences, susceptibility to inbreeding, and signs of local adaptation
title_short Conservation insights from wild bee genetic studies: Geographic differences, susceptibility to inbreeding, and signs of local adaptation
title_sort conservation insights from wild bee genetic studies: geographic differences, susceptibility to inbreeding, and signs of local adaptation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34178099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13221
work_keys_str_mv AT kelemenevanp conservationinsightsfromwildbeegeneticstudiesgeographicdifferencessusceptibilitytoinbreedingandsignsoflocaladaptation
AT rehansandram conservationinsightsfromwildbeegeneticstudiesgeographicdifferencessusceptibilitytoinbreedingandsignsoflocaladaptation