Cargando…

Evaluation of accuracy and reliability of OneCeph digital cephalometric analysis in comparison with manual cephalometric analysis—a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION: Lateral cephalometric analysis continues to be one of the gold standard diagnostic aids in orthodontics, with various software available to enhance this. AIM: This study was done to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of linear and angular measurements obtained from OneCeph digital c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohan, Akshay, Sivakumar, Arvind, Nalabothu, Prasad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34140466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-021-00077-2
_version_ 1783709398736044032
author Mohan, Akshay
Sivakumar, Arvind
Nalabothu, Prasad
author_facet Mohan, Akshay
Sivakumar, Arvind
Nalabothu, Prasad
author_sort Mohan, Akshay
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Lateral cephalometric analysis continues to be one of the gold standard diagnostic aids in orthodontics, with various software available to enhance this. AIM: This study was done to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of linear and angular measurements obtained from OneCeph digital cephalometric tracing and manual tracings in lateral cephalometry. METHODOLOGY: This is a cross-sectional study done on twenty pre-treatment lateral cephalometric radiographs of subjects who reported to the postgraduate orthodontic clinic for orthodontic treatment over one month. Cephalometric tracings were done using OneCeph digital software and manual tracing method to evaluate nine parameters of Steiner’s cephalometric analysis. An Independent T-sample test was done between the mean values of manual and OneCeph tracing. Intra operator reliability was evaluated by paired T-test after a week. RESULTS: No significant statistical difference was observed as the p-value was greater than 0.05 for all the parameters in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The reliability and accuracy of OneCeph software application was found to be at par with manual cephalometric tracing
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8210970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82109702021-06-21 Evaluation of accuracy and reliability of OneCeph digital cephalometric analysis in comparison with manual cephalometric analysis—a cross-sectional study Mohan, Akshay Sivakumar, Arvind Nalabothu, Prasad BDJ Open Article INTRODUCTION: Lateral cephalometric analysis continues to be one of the gold standard diagnostic aids in orthodontics, with various software available to enhance this. AIM: This study was done to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of linear and angular measurements obtained from OneCeph digital cephalometric tracing and manual tracings in lateral cephalometry. METHODOLOGY: This is a cross-sectional study done on twenty pre-treatment lateral cephalometric radiographs of subjects who reported to the postgraduate orthodontic clinic for orthodontic treatment over one month. Cephalometric tracings were done using OneCeph digital software and manual tracing method to evaluate nine parameters of Steiner’s cephalometric analysis. An Independent T-sample test was done between the mean values of manual and OneCeph tracing. Intra operator reliability was evaluated by paired T-test after a week. RESULTS: No significant statistical difference was observed as the p-value was greater than 0.05 for all the parameters in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The reliability and accuracy of OneCeph software application was found to be at par with manual cephalometric tracing Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8210970/ /pubmed/34140466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-021-00077-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Mohan, Akshay
Sivakumar, Arvind
Nalabothu, Prasad
Evaluation of accuracy and reliability of OneCeph digital cephalometric analysis in comparison with manual cephalometric analysis—a cross-sectional study
title Evaluation of accuracy and reliability of OneCeph digital cephalometric analysis in comparison with manual cephalometric analysis—a cross-sectional study
title_full Evaluation of accuracy and reliability of OneCeph digital cephalometric analysis in comparison with manual cephalometric analysis—a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Evaluation of accuracy and reliability of OneCeph digital cephalometric analysis in comparison with manual cephalometric analysis—a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of accuracy and reliability of OneCeph digital cephalometric analysis in comparison with manual cephalometric analysis—a cross-sectional study
title_short Evaluation of accuracy and reliability of OneCeph digital cephalometric analysis in comparison with manual cephalometric analysis—a cross-sectional study
title_sort evaluation of accuracy and reliability of oneceph digital cephalometric analysis in comparison with manual cephalometric analysis—a cross-sectional study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34140466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-021-00077-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mohanakshay evaluationofaccuracyandreliabilityofonecephdigitalcephalometricanalysisincomparisonwithmanualcephalometricanalysisacrosssectionalstudy
AT sivakumararvind evaluationofaccuracyandreliabilityofonecephdigitalcephalometricanalysisincomparisonwithmanualcephalometricanalysisacrosssectionalstudy
AT nalabothuprasad evaluationofaccuracyandreliabilityofonecephdigitalcephalometricanalysisincomparisonwithmanualcephalometricanalysisacrosssectionalstudy