Cargando…
Implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial
INTRODUCTION: Researchers, policy-makers and healthcare professionals often stress the importance of an early dementia diagnosis. Empirical evidence, however, is scarce leading to a lack of consensus on the necessity of diagnosing dementia early. We emphasise the need for a ‘timely’ diagnosis, that...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34135053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049322 |
_version_ | 1783709412018356224 |
---|---|
author | Linden, Iris Wolfs, Claire Perry, Marieke Metsemakers, Job van der Weijden, Trudy de Vugt, Marjolein Verhey, Frans R Handels, Ron Olde Rikkert, Marcel Dirksen, Carmen Ponds, Rudolf W H M |
author_facet | Linden, Iris Wolfs, Claire Perry, Marieke Metsemakers, Job van der Weijden, Trudy de Vugt, Marjolein Verhey, Frans R Handels, Ron Olde Rikkert, Marcel Dirksen, Carmen Ponds, Rudolf W H M |
author_sort | Linden, Iris |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Researchers, policy-makers and healthcare professionals often stress the importance of an early dementia diagnosis. Empirical evidence, however, is scarce leading to a lack of consensus on the necessity of diagnosing dementia early. We emphasise the need for a ‘timely’ diagnosis, that is, one that occurs at the right moment for a person with memory complaints and his/her significant other. As the optimal timing differs between individuals, the implementation of shared decision making (SDM), preferably by the general practitioner (GP), as the start of a diagnostic trajectory, could help to determine this timely moment. SDM, however, is rarely practised with respect to dementia diagnoses. Therefore, in the context of the Shared Decision-Making regarding Dementia Diagnosis project, a patient decision aid (PtDA) for ‘timely’ dementia diagnosis in general practice will be developed. This protocol will describe the planned before and after evaluation of its implementation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a mixed-methods pilot study, we will investigate decision-making processes and experiences regarding a diagnostic trajectory before and after the introduction of a PtDA for people with memory complaints, their significant others and their GPs. The ‘before group’ will receive diagnostics as usual from their GPs. The ‘after group’ will use the PtDA. We expect the PtDA to increase the level of SDM and to contribute to a timely and personalised diagnostic trajectory. Data will be collected using semistructured interviews, questionnaires and information retrieved from people with memory complaints’ medical records. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol was approved by the Medical Review Ethics Committee of the Maastricht University Medical Centre. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed international journals and presented at conferences. This study was funded by the public funded Dutch Research Institute for Care and Medical Sciences (ZonMw). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04531956. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8211080 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82110802021-07-01 Implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial Linden, Iris Wolfs, Claire Perry, Marieke Metsemakers, Job van der Weijden, Trudy de Vugt, Marjolein Verhey, Frans R Handels, Ron Olde Rikkert, Marcel Dirksen, Carmen Ponds, Rudolf W H M BMJ Open General practice / Family practice INTRODUCTION: Researchers, policy-makers and healthcare professionals often stress the importance of an early dementia diagnosis. Empirical evidence, however, is scarce leading to a lack of consensus on the necessity of diagnosing dementia early. We emphasise the need for a ‘timely’ diagnosis, that is, one that occurs at the right moment for a person with memory complaints and his/her significant other. As the optimal timing differs between individuals, the implementation of shared decision making (SDM), preferably by the general practitioner (GP), as the start of a diagnostic trajectory, could help to determine this timely moment. SDM, however, is rarely practised with respect to dementia diagnoses. Therefore, in the context of the Shared Decision-Making regarding Dementia Diagnosis project, a patient decision aid (PtDA) for ‘timely’ dementia diagnosis in general practice will be developed. This protocol will describe the planned before and after evaluation of its implementation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a mixed-methods pilot study, we will investigate decision-making processes and experiences regarding a diagnostic trajectory before and after the introduction of a PtDA for people with memory complaints, their significant others and their GPs. The ‘before group’ will receive diagnostics as usual from their GPs. The ‘after group’ will use the PtDA. We expect the PtDA to increase the level of SDM and to contribute to a timely and personalised diagnostic trajectory. Data will be collected using semistructured interviews, questionnaires and information retrieved from people with memory complaints’ medical records. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol was approved by the Medical Review Ethics Committee of the Maastricht University Medical Centre. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed international journals and presented at conferences. This study was funded by the public funded Dutch Research Institute for Care and Medical Sciences (ZonMw). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04531956. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8211080/ /pubmed/34135053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049322 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Linden, Iris Wolfs, Claire Perry, Marieke Metsemakers, Job van der Weijden, Trudy de Vugt, Marjolein Verhey, Frans R Handels, Ron Olde Rikkert, Marcel Dirksen, Carmen Ponds, Rudolf W H M Implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial |
title | Implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial |
title_full | Implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial |
title_fullStr | Implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial |
title_short | Implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial |
title_sort | implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34135053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049322 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lindeniris implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial AT wolfsclaire implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial AT perrymarieke implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial AT metsemakersjob implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial AT vanderweijdentrudy implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial AT devugtmarjolein implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial AT verheyfransr implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial AT handelsron implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial AT olderikkertmarcel implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial AT dirksencarmen implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial AT pondsrudolfwhm implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial |