Cargando…

Implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial

INTRODUCTION: Researchers, policy-makers and healthcare professionals often stress the importance of an early dementia diagnosis. Empirical evidence, however, is scarce leading to a lack of consensus on the necessity of diagnosing dementia early. We emphasise the need for a ‘timely’ diagnosis, that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Linden, Iris, Wolfs, Claire, Perry, Marieke, Metsemakers, Job, van der Weijden, Trudy, de Vugt, Marjolein, Verhey, Frans R, Handels, Ron, Olde Rikkert, Marcel, Dirksen, Carmen, Ponds, Rudolf W H M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34135053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049322
_version_ 1783709412018356224
author Linden, Iris
Wolfs, Claire
Perry, Marieke
Metsemakers, Job
van der Weijden, Trudy
de Vugt, Marjolein
Verhey, Frans R
Handels, Ron
Olde Rikkert, Marcel
Dirksen, Carmen
Ponds, Rudolf W H M
author_facet Linden, Iris
Wolfs, Claire
Perry, Marieke
Metsemakers, Job
van der Weijden, Trudy
de Vugt, Marjolein
Verhey, Frans R
Handels, Ron
Olde Rikkert, Marcel
Dirksen, Carmen
Ponds, Rudolf W H M
author_sort Linden, Iris
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Researchers, policy-makers and healthcare professionals often stress the importance of an early dementia diagnosis. Empirical evidence, however, is scarce leading to a lack of consensus on the necessity of diagnosing dementia early. We emphasise the need for a ‘timely’ diagnosis, that is, one that occurs at the right moment for a person with memory complaints and his/her significant other. As the optimal timing differs between individuals, the implementation of shared decision making (SDM), preferably by the general practitioner (GP), as the start of a diagnostic trajectory, could help to determine this timely moment. SDM, however, is rarely practised with respect to dementia diagnoses. Therefore, in the context of the Shared Decision-Making regarding Dementia Diagnosis project, a patient decision aid (PtDA) for ‘timely’ dementia diagnosis in general practice will be developed. This protocol will describe the planned before and after evaluation of its implementation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a mixed-methods pilot study, we will investigate decision-making processes and experiences regarding a diagnostic trajectory before and after the introduction of a PtDA for people with memory complaints, their significant others and their GPs. The ‘before group’ will receive diagnostics as usual from their GPs. The ‘after group’ will use the PtDA. We expect the PtDA to increase the level of SDM and to contribute to a timely and personalised diagnostic trajectory. Data will be collected using semistructured interviews, questionnaires and information retrieved from people with memory complaints’ medical records. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol was approved by the Medical Review Ethics Committee of the Maastricht University Medical Centre. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed international journals and presented at conferences. This study was funded by the public funded Dutch Research Institute for Care and Medical Sciences (ZonMw). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04531956.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8211080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82110802021-07-01 Implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial Linden, Iris Wolfs, Claire Perry, Marieke Metsemakers, Job van der Weijden, Trudy de Vugt, Marjolein Verhey, Frans R Handels, Ron Olde Rikkert, Marcel Dirksen, Carmen Ponds, Rudolf W H M BMJ Open General practice / Family practice INTRODUCTION: Researchers, policy-makers and healthcare professionals often stress the importance of an early dementia diagnosis. Empirical evidence, however, is scarce leading to a lack of consensus on the necessity of diagnosing dementia early. We emphasise the need for a ‘timely’ diagnosis, that is, one that occurs at the right moment for a person with memory complaints and his/her significant other. As the optimal timing differs between individuals, the implementation of shared decision making (SDM), preferably by the general practitioner (GP), as the start of a diagnostic trajectory, could help to determine this timely moment. SDM, however, is rarely practised with respect to dementia diagnoses. Therefore, in the context of the Shared Decision-Making regarding Dementia Diagnosis project, a patient decision aid (PtDA) for ‘timely’ dementia diagnosis in general practice will be developed. This protocol will describe the planned before and after evaluation of its implementation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a mixed-methods pilot study, we will investigate decision-making processes and experiences regarding a diagnostic trajectory before and after the introduction of a PtDA for people with memory complaints, their significant others and their GPs. The ‘before group’ will receive diagnostics as usual from their GPs. The ‘after group’ will use the PtDA. We expect the PtDA to increase the level of SDM and to contribute to a timely and personalised diagnostic trajectory. Data will be collected using semistructured interviews, questionnaires and information retrieved from people with memory complaints’ medical records. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol was approved by the Medical Review Ethics Committee of the Maastricht University Medical Centre. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed international journals and presented at conferences. This study was funded by the public funded Dutch Research Institute for Care and Medical Sciences (ZonMw). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04531956. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8211080/ /pubmed/34135053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049322 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Linden, Iris
Wolfs, Claire
Perry, Marieke
Metsemakers, Job
van der Weijden, Trudy
de Vugt, Marjolein
Verhey, Frans R
Handels, Ron
Olde Rikkert, Marcel
Dirksen, Carmen
Ponds, Rudolf W H M
Implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial
title Implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial
title_full Implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial
title_fullStr Implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial
title_short Implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial
title_sort implementation of a diagnostic decision aid for people with memory complaints and their general practitioners: a protocol of a before and after pilot trial
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34135053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049322
work_keys_str_mv AT lindeniris implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial
AT wolfsclaire implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial
AT perrymarieke implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial
AT metsemakersjob implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial
AT vanderweijdentrudy implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial
AT devugtmarjolein implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial
AT verheyfransr implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial
AT handelsron implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial
AT olderikkertmarcel implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial
AT dirksencarmen implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial
AT pondsrudolfwhm implementationofadiagnosticdecisionaidforpeoplewithmemorycomplaintsandtheirgeneralpractitionersaprotocolofabeforeandafterpilottrial