Cargando…

Stigma research in the field of intellectual disabilities: a scoping review on the perspective of care providers

Care providers are key agents in the lives of individuals with an intellectual disability (ID). The quality of their support can be affected by manifestations of stigma. This scoping review was conducted to explore studies that provide indications of care providers’ stigmatization of people with ID....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pelleboer-Gunnink, Hannah A., van Oorsouw, Wietske M. W. J., van Weeghel, Jaap, Embregts, Petri J. C. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2019.1616990
_version_ 1783709417470951424
author Pelleboer-Gunnink, Hannah A.
van Oorsouw, Wietske M. W. J.
van Weeghel, Jaap
Embregts, Petri J. C. M.
author_facet Pelleboer-Gunnink, Hannah A.
van Oorsouw, Wietske M. W. J.
van Weeghel, Jaap
Embregts, Petri J. C. M.
author_sort Pelleboer-Gunnink, Hannah A.
collection PubMed
description Care providers are key agents in the lives of individuals with an intellectual disability (ID). The quality of their support can be affected by manifestations of stigma. This scoping review was conducted to explore studies that provide indications of care providers’ stigmatization of people with ID. Methods: A structured search was made in four databases to identify relevant studies in English-language peer-reviewed journals. Records were systematically and independently screened by the researchers. Results: The 40 articles included in this review were mainly conducted in Western countries and used Likert-type self-report measures of explicit attitudes. Stigmatization seemed more distinct concerning people with high support needs. The few studies on public stigma preliminary suggest that staff may also stigmatize people with ID based on other social identities. Regarding the support of structural stigma, staff reported skepticism regarding community inclusion for people with high support needs, and tended to be ambivalent about the protection-or-empowerment balance in the support of people with ID. Possible indications of stigmatization regarding sexuality were found on specific issues, such as self-determination and privacy. Agreement of staff with certain rights did not necessarily lead to staff acting in accordance with such rights. Conclusion: Indications of stigmatization of people with ID by care providers were found. Stigmatizing attitudes might affect the quality of care providers’ support. Potential leads for future interventions concern creating awareness, sharing power, addressing diagnostic overshadowing, and providing explicit policy translations. Directions for future research concern strengthening the methodology of studies and enriching the studied topics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8211133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82111332021-06-28 Stigma research in the field of intellectual disabilities: a scoping review on the perspective of care providers Pelleboer-Gunnink, Hannah A. van Oorsouw, Wietske M. W. J. van Weeghel, Jaap Embregts, Petri J. C. M. Int J Dev Disabil Reviews Care providers are key agents in the lives of individuals with an intellectual disability (ID). The quality of their support can be affected by manifestations of stigma. This scoping review was conducted to explore studies that provide indications of care providers’ stigmatization of people with ID. Methods: A structured search was made in four databases to identify relevant studies in English-language peer-reviewed journals. Records were systematically and independently screened by the researchers. Results: The 40 articles included in this review were mainly conducted in Western countries and used Likert-type self-report measures of explicit attitudes. Stigmatization seemed more distinct concerning people with high support needs. The few studies on public stigma preliminary suggest that staff may also stigmatize people with ID based on other social identities. Regarding the support of structural stigma, staff reported skepticism regarding community inclusion for people with high support needs, and tended to be ambivalent about the protection-or-empowerment balance in the support of people with ID. Possible indications of stigmatization regarding sexuality were found on specific issues, such as self-determination and privacy. Agreement of staff with certain rights did not necessarily lead to staff acting in accordance with such rights. Conclusion: Indications of stigmatization of people with ID by care providers were found. Stigmatizing attitudes might affect the quality of care providers’ support. Potential leads for future interventions concern creating awareness, sharing power, addressing diagnostic overshadowing, and providing explicit policy translations. Directions for future research concern strengthening the methodology of studies and enriching the studied topics. Taylor & Francis 2019-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8211133/ /pubmed/34188898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2019.1616990 Text en © 2019. The British Society of Developmental Disabilities https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Reviews
Pelleboer-Gunnink, Hannah A.
van Oorsouw, Wietske M. W. J.
van Weeghel, Jaap
Embregts, Petri J. C. M.
Stigma research in the field of intellectual disabilities: a scoping review on the perspective of care providers
title Stigma research in the field of intellectual disabilities: a scoping review on the perspective of care providers
title_full Stigma research in the field of intellectual disabilities: a scoping review on the perspective of care providers
title_fullStr Stigma research in the field of intellectual disabilities: a scoping review on the perspective of care providers
title_full_unstemmed Stigma research in the field of intellectual disabilities: a scoping review on the perspective of care providers
title_short Stigma research in the field of intellectual disabilities: a scoping review on the perspective of care providers
title_sort stigma research in the field of intellectual disabilities: a scoping review on the perspective of care providers
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8211133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2019.1616990
work_keys_str_mv AT pelleboergunninkhannaha stigmaresearchinthefieldofintellectualdisabilitiesascopingreviewontheperspectiveofcareproviders
AT vanoorsouwwietskemwj stigmaresearchinthefieldofintellectualdisabilitiesascopingreviewontheperspectiveofcareproviders
AT vanweegheljaap stigmaresearchinthefieldofintellectualdisabilitiesascopingreviewontheperspectiveofcareproviders
AT embregtspetrijcm stigmaresearchinthefieldofintellectualdisabilitiesascopingreviewontheperspectiveofcareproviders